
Join The Tinkerer on Whop. Membership gets you early releases, private tools and a bunch of extra stuff.
š Join on Whop
š¬ Join the community for support, free tools and early news on Discord
This is the model you reach for when you want super clean, photo-realistic results.
Itās sharp, powerful, and somehow just nails gorgeous images every single time.
āļø Recommended Settings
Sampling method: DPM++ 2M SDE Karras
VAE: is already Baked In
Sampling steps: 30+ Steps
Resolution: 832x1216 / 896x1152
CFG: 3-5
Clip Skip: 1
Upscale: 1.5 upscale (0.3 - 0.35 denoise)
Upscalers: 4x_NickelbackFS_72000_G / 4x_foolhardy_Remacri / 4x_NMKD-Siax_200kāļø Recommended Settings DMD2
Sampler: LCM
Schedule Type: Exponential
Sampling Steps: 8/12 (12 for extra detail)
CFG Scale: 1-1.5
ā” These settings are not the same as the standard SDXL workflow ā be sure to adjust your pipeline!š” Whatās the difference between FP16 and FP32 checkpoints?
FP16 (half precision) uses 16-bit floating-point weights. Itās smaller in size, loads faster, and uses less VRAM - perfect for normal image generation. You wonāt notice any visual difference for inference, so itās ideal for everyday use.
FP32 (full precision) uses 32-bit weights, which means itās larger and heavier on resources. It doesnāt improve generation quality, but itās better if youāre training, merging, or fine-tuning models, since it keeps the exact weight data without rounding loss.
š§ Prompting
Example negative prompt:
cartoon, illustration, anime, painting, CGI, 3D render, low quality, watermark, logo, labelor use CyberRealistic Negative
⨠Optional Adetailer
Adetailer model: face_yolov9c.pt
If you only want the main face being refined set 'Mask only the top k largest' to 1.š Links
Backup location: HuggingFace
ā Fuel the Project
If this model gave you stellar results, consider buying me a coffee. Or two. Or, you know⦠a GPU.
ā ļø Heads-Up
This model can make mature or sensitive content. Youāre fully responsible for what you create, so use it responsibly (or if you canāt resist, at least be artistically irresponsible).
š¬ Want Better Prompts?
Use this custom ChatGPT to auto-generate polished prompts for CyberRealistic XL:
š [Try it now on ChatGPT]
Description
The long-awaited successor to CyberRealistic XL V6.0 is finally here.
This has been one of my biggest and most ambitious releases so far. Countless hours of fine-tuning, testing, and balancing to create something Iām truly proud of.
Whatās new in V7.0?
⨠Much cleaner and more refined outputs
⨠Strong balance between SFW and NSFW - versatile for every workflow
⨠Noticeably improved hands and eyes for greater realism and fewer artifacts
⨠Polished tones, details, and consistency that make prompts shine
Every sample image you see was generated using the FP32 version, which is also included in this release for maximum quality and reliability.
Iām very pleased with how this turned out, and I hope my users enjoy working with it as much as I enjoyed building it.
FAQ
Comments (60)
v7 is amazing, love that its fp32 too
awesome job on 7.0, but will you do an inpainting for 7.0?
Love your work. Are there any plans for chroma finetunes? Thank you.
Canāt wait to try the new version!
This definitely feels like a solid upgrade in my initial tests:
- Textures feel more realistic, less plasticky or mushy
- Better style coverage and consistency (some prompts in previous versions reverted to a cartoony look or turned black and white (unprompted)). This version kept the same style throughout.
- Slightly better prompt adherence
- Slightly less jank
Good job!
Is the training of LoRAs for the fp32 version identical to SDXL in all respects, or are there any caveats or additional instructions to optimize them?
Despite what the instructions say, v7 requires clip skip 2 to work, unlike v6.
? you use ComfUI? What happened if you use Clip skip 1? (tested it in Forge Clip Skip 1 and 2 just works)
Can confirm that in the latest ComfyUI, clip skip 1 results in a black image. Clip skip 2 works as expected.
@CyberdeliaĀ No I use Draw Things. Clip skip 1 fails to generate. 2 works just fine though.
in fooocus also can't work with Clip skip 1 but fine with 2
in comfyui work on clip skip 2 not 1, 1 will result in black image
Forge is working with -1 while Comfy is not and requires -2
sd next also working perfectly with clip skip 1
@jay_man100Ā @LionTheLionĀ @Chi8wahĀ @eriocaĀ @abpixĀ @farto972Ā it's not really an issue. If you use my ComfUI workflow (new one will be published on Patreon) it just works. Just use Clip 2
Best CyberrealisticXL so far. Much much better than 6.0 which i didn't like at all. Colors are much better now. Everything is balanced, everything is OK. I tested a lot of checkpoints -way too many- and this one is clearly in the Top tier, higher tier, top of the crop.
Looking forward to see how this evolves.
Iām really happy with it too, and also a bit proud. I think itās difficult to make many more changes at this point.
@CyberdeliaĀ What about to get rid of AI look once and for all?
@hamzahdaelan937Ā .....
v7 is fantastic! especially the variety in faces and hairstyles - very nice. I love how hair (structure, color, cut) is drawn.
Love all your models but this one is the best for photorealism! I got the refiner working in SwarmUI with excellent results. It's hard to produce a bad image with this version. It does anything and everything you want.
i'm honestly surprised this isn't utilized or as popular as the Pony counterpart.
You know⦠I donāt really get it either. I use CyberRealistic XL about 95% of the time and get much better results than with CyberRealistic Pony, which makes sense given the base itās built on.
I often get comments or questions about how to make Pony more realistic, and my answer is always the same: CyberRealistic XL.
Maybe Pony is just a bit easier to work with? Honestly, Iām not sure.
@CyberdeliaĀ Pony just knows concepts, what sdxl can dream about. Anyway much better anatomy, precise booru tags (you get, what you prompt), much much better emotions etc.
I switched back to xl from pony, because i was tired of the look and wanted some real photolike look, but yeah, people generate their dreams, which is easier with pony.
@gregoribanner970Ā i understand where you're coming from for certain concepts but i do believe the SDXL version is powerful with lighting options and more dynamic subjects.
@CyberdeliaĀ like @gregoribanner970 stated it must be because of the booru tags and prompt adherence that Pony offers. do you recommend natural language prompts or tagging for this model? i tend to enjoy tags more than creating a paragraph.
@alylaĀ try this https://chatgpt.com/g/g-689af7b67b8c8191a3cd3f8e8bc1961b-sdxl-prompt-artisan
Created for this purpose
@CyberdeliaĀ oh that's interesting. how nsfw can it get?
@alylaĀ ChatGPT 5 is not great for NSFW, but ChatGPT 4 is (if you have ChatGPT plus you can choose that.)
But you can ask to make it SFW or Artistic and then manually add the NSFW parts in :)
Also you can ask it to create prompts to test the checkpoint or for study. It was really NSFW friendly before ChatGPT 5.
@CyberdeliaĀ thank you!
@CyberdeliaĀ Do you have the system prompt or other info so that something like this can be run locally? That may be something you offer on patreon, I'm not sure.
@brandonsmithman12345618Ā like this?
https://civitai.com/articles/15255/forge-setup-guide-cyberrealistic-models-windows
There will be a new version of this installer on Patreon tomorrow. So basically running will give you a complete system for running this locally
@CyberdeliaĀ Thanks for the response. I do have forge setup and running but I meant to ask if you had resources for your CyberRealisitic Prompt Helper LLM. I was wondering if you had available the system prompt, or any other information in order to set up my own local running LLM for that purpose.
@brandonsmithman12345618Ā Like this?
https://www.patreon.com/posts/136673333
@CyberdeliaĀ Exactly that, sorry for the confusion. Thank you!
Popularity isn't necessarily due to the quality.
Pony can make a photorealistic image style, but the subjects are always stylized. Especially the faces are always wrong, people don't look like that.
im not. XL has a lot of issues that pony does not suffer from. while this is a good model, it is still XL.
GPT_Template
works your template also with other models?
Yes
Can the XL version generate explicit pornographic images? BJ, anal, missionary, cumshots, etc. etc.
Yes
yes
@CyberdeliaĀ , In Comfyui do I use clipskip 2 or 1?
yes but you probably want pony for that. its better
Are we going to get a DMD2 version?
V7.0 DMD2?
@CyberdeliaĀ yeahh
+1
Can't you just add the DMD2 lora to your workflow yourself?
@malari96Ā the generations don't come out anywhere near the same, when using a DMD2 lora compared to using a checkpoint with it integrated.
@TheSmizzleĀ that's what i have been saying since the days of Turbo, then Lightning now DMD,creators don't try both and think we're lazy but difference is huge, without dmd generations lack details and need to finetune a lot while DMD integrated you get smooth crisp finish
This is my favorite model for realistic images! The author is BRAVO!
@Cyberdelia - Question about the metadata in your showcase images:
When i load them into Forge, some of them have these Override Settings, like "Clip Skip 2" or "Skip Early CFG". How do you set these in Forge?
The function to enable Clip Skip for the SDXL interface doesn't work for some reason, and the global interface adds a huge bloat of unused features instead.
Ignore Clip Skip - thereās no need to change it, and it has no effect in Forge.
As for Skip Early CFG, youāll find it under Stable Diffusion > Optimizations. Set āIgnore Negative Prompt during Early Stepsā to 0.25 (you may need to experiment with this value).
Clip Skip 2 seems to make little or no difference in some models / prompts, but i sometimes get hugely distorted results without it. Like twisted limbs and wrong proportions.
v7 is a really nice model. Thank you.
Absolutely love this series of models, thanks for your work.
YAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Thank you so very much for this!!!! You once again have out done yourself!!! Bravo!!!!
How did you build your training dataset? Did you take real photos, synthetic data or a combination of both? I have some difficulties with balancing my dataset for training a SANA checkpoint...
Itās a mix of various methods and datasets. As a foundation, standard available datasets were used, but also specific ones (often based on existing images). You can also see that Iāve made quite a few versions - in some of them, older datasets were removed (because they didnāt work) or updated. Iām currently working on version 7.1, where some older trainings have been removed and updated. Thereās no major difference in normal use, but in certain situations, you can really see the improvements.
Details
Files
cyberrealisticXL_v70.safetensors
Mirrors
cyberrealisticXL_v70.safetensors
CyberRealisticXLPlay_V7.0_FP16.safetensors
CyberRealisticXLPlay_V7.0_FP16.safetensors
cyberrealisticXL_v70.safetensors
cyberrealisticXL_v70.safetensors
cyberrealisticXL_v70.safetensors
cyberrealisticXL_v70.safetensors
cyberrealisticXL_v70.safetensors
cyberrealisticXL_v70.safetensors








