Join The Tinkerer on Whop. Membership gets you early releases, private tools and a bunch of extra stuff.
👉 Join on Whop
💬 Join the community for support, free tools and early news on Discord
This is the model you reach for when you want super clean, photo-realistic results.
It’s sharp, powerful, and somehow just nails gorgeous images every single time.
⚙️ Recommended Settings
Sampling method: DPM++ 2M SDE Karras
VAE: is already Baked In
Sampling steps: 30+ Steps
Resolution: 832x1216 / 896x1152
CFG: 3-5
Clip Skip: 1
Upscale: 1.5 upscale (0.3 - 0.35 denoise)
Upscalers: 4x_NickelbackFS_72000_G / 4x_foolhardy_Remacri / 4x_NMKD-Siax_200k⚙️ Recommended Settings DMD2
Sampler: LCM
Schedule Type: Exponential
Sampling Steps: 8/12 (12 for extra detail)
CFG Scale: 1-1.5
⚡ These settings are not the same as the standard SDXL workflow — be sure to adjust your pipeline!💡 What’s the difference between FP16 and FP32 checkpoints?
FP16 (half precision) uses 16-bit floating-point weights. It’s smaller in size, loads faster, and uses less VRAM - perfect for normal image generation. You won’t notice any visual difference for inference, so it’s ideal for everyday use.
FP32 (full precision) uses 32-bit weights, which means it’s larger and heavier on resources. It doesn’t improve generation quality, but it’s better if you’re training, merging, or fine-tuning models, since it keeps the exact weight data without rounding loss.
🧠 Prompting
Example negative prompt:
cartoon, illustration, anime, painting, CGI, 3D render, low quality, watermark, logo, labelor use CyberRealistic Negative
✨ Optional Adetailer
Adetailer model: face_yolov9c.pt
If you only want the main face being refined set 'Mask only the top k largest' to 1.🔗 Links
Backup location: HuggingFace
☕ Fuel the Project
If this model gave you stellar results, consider buying me a coffee. Or two. Or, you know… a GPU.
⚠️ Heads-Up
This model can make mature or sensitive content. You’re fully responsible for what you create, so use it responsibly (or if you can’t resist, at least be artistically irresponsible).
💬 Want Better Prompts?
Use this custom ChatGPT to auto-generate polished prompts for CyberRealistic XL:
🔗 [Try it now on ChatGPT]
Description
This updated version of CyberRealistic SDXL features a number of improvements: I've cleaned up some elements, added new details, and enhanced the rendering of light and effects for a more dynamic and polished look.
It can produce more NSFW results than earlier versions - but only if you want it to. It remains fully capable of generating SFW content depending on your prompts.
As always, some people might prefer an earlier version - and that's okay. Every update brings changes, and this is the natural evolution of the model.
FAQ
Comments (33)
As always, I love your models, man. Thanks!
What a treat! Downloading now, thank you so much for your impeccable work 💖
👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻
My fav SFW checkpoint. With the v.53 i had very weird outputs and i preferred to use v.5. But now, everything is on its right place again. Lightning is a lot more interesting and less flat now. That was a good call.
And the best thing is not as horny as v.53 and v. 5. (which were completely insane... yes, sometimes you want your characters not naked and i don't want to spend a lot of time doing impainting to put clothes on).
Very nice work.
Cheers.
Totally agree about the NSFW part. It can be nsfw but only if you want it.
How do you think CyberRealistic SDXL, Pony, and CyberIllustrious compare to each other? Like, in aesthetics, prompt adherence, amount of knowledge...?
I would never go back to XL, even if it could produce Pony and Illustrious perfect poses.
XL can make 2 expressions: smile, expressionless.
I must remind myself, why im on Pony, when i see photorealistic porn:)
learn to prompt, xl can do almost any facial expression, even subtle ones.
@einganztoller677 agree. I must admit that the latest version is better with expressions then previous versions.
Pro Tip: Make a screenshot of an image you want the facial expression of, put it in ChatGPT and ask it how to prompt SDXL to get that facial expression. Results are great.
@einganztoller677 Bullshit. Did you use ever a pony, illustrious model? Than you know with booru tags you can achive any emotions, you can mix them, whatever. XL simple doesnt have knowledge of subtle emotions.
@robertloomis681 I've used pony and illustrious too much for my own good. They are good for sexual and exaggerated emotions (Ahegao and the likes). For anything else they are not better, if not worse than SDXL. The OP's statement "XL can make 2 expressions: smile, expressionless." is just plain wrong. What emotion would you like to see from SDXL? I'll give it a try.
@einganztoller677 Naughty face is a complex emotion(seductive, bad girl, flirty, slutty, teaser together).
My bad, i didnt use XL for a while, i migrated to Pony, but i tried all XL models back then and with simple prompts i coulnt achive that look(maybe Chatgpt novel can).
Im the Op
@robertloomis681 Alright I tried "naughty face". You need to add the full composition "seductive, bad girl, flirty, slutty, teaser", then this model nails it, see the newest image in my gallery. "Naughty face" alone gives you more of a SFW gleeful laughing expression.
@einganztoller677 Agreed, when you prompt emotions, you need to add supporting prompts to help it. That goes for poses as well. :)
5.6: Not quite as realistic as EpicRealismXL but very coherent, good hands, plenty of poses and scenes, and doesn't have such a heavy bias for closeups. 👌
If you drop some LoRAs into this version, you'll achieve similar "realism", but you might sacrifice some coherence or other aspects.
no text to image model exist can do correct anatomy of human from behind or from side , looking back.
prompt it and you're getting alien
I know 1.5 cant, but XL, Pony, Illustrious can do fine.
"view from behind, looking back over shoulder" can yield some good results
@pixel8er what about lower back , i think getting some anatomy error at this part in addition can't make a character stand straight without any bending ? ..
@robertloomis681 well, no single image can approve that plus me trying many sdxl for a year , nothing can get realistic shape and a bit correct anatomy in this pose except a lora someone created for my and it's a bit try not a solution , without merging 2 models also it's impossible to fix that problem (be lucky and try which 2 model to merge) , if you find a picture as you saying it's easy to get , post a link to the pic here in a comment (never exist - sdxl,pony,ill..)
@amazingbeauty first pic on this gallery
https://civitai.com/images/73683144
I think this is correct anatomy including the camera angle.
Perhaps it is not your models but your sampler and scheduler? Lately I have been a fan of dpmpp_sde with karras, but found that euler_ancestral works better with some other checkpoints (specifically Pony ones).
Occasionally I get extra limbs or bad hands, but really never have issues with people from the back.
Just generated a couple without issue on the first try with 5.6a and no LoRAs:
https://civitai.com/images/73715066
https://civitai.com/images/73715208
@pixel8er @pixel8er a bit or more fake bodies like it's cartoon girls , might be you can't figure that .. your point of view , but those are aliens to me
@pixel8er the back a bit straighten which is what i mean but over all there's still fake
Amazing checkpoint! Throw in any prompt you like, and it will provide the results if prompted correctly. Mind-blowing work! 🤍
Is this meant to be a NSFW model as well?
atleast I noticed it possible to prompt not sure if intended lol
Yes, you could go wild with this model if you want.
@Cyberdelia Are there any particular settings you would recommend for this specifically with NSFW in mind?, Both Sampling, Schedule and upscalers please
@makaveli_313 My personal settings are in the description. Pretty basic but it works :)
@Cyberdelia alright the same as sfw then. thanks look forward to your future realism versions.