
Join The Tinkerer on Whop. Membership gets you early releases, private tools and a bunch of extra stuff.
👉 Join on Whop
💬 Join the community for support, free tools and early news on Discord
This is the model you reach for when you want super clean, photo-realistic results.
It’s sharp, powerful, and somehow just nails gorgeous images every single time.
⚙️ Recommended Settings
Sampling method: DPM++ 2M SDE Karras
VAE: is already Baked In
Sampling steps: 30+ Steps
Resolution: 832x1216 / 896x1152
CFG: 3-5
Clip Skip: 1
Upscale: 1.5 upscale (0.3 - 0.35 denoise)
Upscalers: 4x_NickelbackFS_72000_G / 4x_foolhardy_Remacri / 4x_NMKD-Siax_200k⚙️ Recommended Settings DMD2
Sampler: LCM
Schedule Type: Exponential
Sampling Steps: 8/12 (12 for extra detail)
CFG Scale: 1-1.5
⚡ These settings are not the same as the standard SDXL workflow — be sure to adjust your pipeline!💡 What’s the difference between FP16 and FP32 checkpoints?
FP16 (half precision) uses 16-bit floating-point weights. It’s smaller in size, loads faster, and uses less VRAM - perfect for normal image generation. You won’t notice any visual difference for inference, so it’s ideal for everyday use.
FP32 (full precision) uses 32-bit weights, which means it’s larger and heavier on resources. It doesn’t improve generation quality, but it’s better if you’re training, merging, or fine-tuning models, since it keeps the exact weight data without rounding loss.
🧠 Prompting
Example negative prompt:
cartoon, illustration, anime, painting, CGI, 3D render, low quality, watermark, logo, labelor use CyberRealistic Negative
✨ Optional Adetailer
Adetailer model: face_yolov9c.pt
If you only want the main face being refined set 'Mask only the top k largest' to 1.🔗 Links
Backup location: HuggingFace
☕ Fuel the Project
If this model gave you stellar results, consider buying me a coffee. Or two. Or, you know… a GPU.
⚠️ Heads-Up
This model can make mature or sensitive content. You’re fully responsible for what you create, so use it responsibly (or if you can’t resist, at least be artistically irresponsible).
💬 Want Better Prompts?
Use this custom ChatGPT to auto-generate polished prompts for CyberRealistic XL:
🔗 [Try it now on ChatGPT]
Description
The model has been further improved and redefined.
FAQ
Comments (18)
you are going to spoil us with these monthly releases
I had some backlog, and since I had some extra time due to the holiday, I was able to take care of a few things.
Another great version. Excellent checkpoint. Keep up the good work 😎
If trying this first time, note that there is a typo:
DPM++ 3M SDE Karras
DPM++ 2M Karras
Euler A
Make sure your scheduler is Karras when doing sampling with 3M SDE. 👍
Great model, as always.
I now use DPM++ SDE Karras. But good info, it can be confusing.
Hello. Can we expect an update of your model to the current version on the SeaArt platform?
I'm afraid I have no control over that. You should consult with SeaArt to see if they are willing to do it.
great model as usual! would you be ok with also sharing the optimizer type and learning rate you used? It could be helpful to the community.
Electric Dreams from the Daily Planet, do you have plans to train something for Flux? we totally need you talent, expertise and your datasets. Plox.
It looks FANTASTIC!!!!!!
Very nice model!
Great model overall, but it loses a ton of detail and realism when used with adetailer. Not enough closeup variety during training maybe?
I have used SD v4.2, SDXL2.0, and SDXL2.2 so far for CyberRealistic. SDXL2.2 allows for the creation of oil paintings and the diverse expression of different ethnicities, which gives great possibilities and satisfaction.
However, there is also room for improvement. Basic words related to body movements and postures did not work as expected. For example, words such as "grabbing," "leaning forward," and "touching" did not work well. These terms worked correctly in SD v42.
I look forward to the future development of CyberRealistic.
Use Fooocus canny body movements and postures
Can I use this model with the CreativeML Open RAIL++-M license for commercial purposes if I include the model name and license in the description?
Sure, no problem
hey, I know its probably been asked before, but any chance you try your hand on a Cyberrealistic Flux?
Finetuning Flux is super expensive. I meant a lot of thousands of dollars. That's the reason why almost nobody did that. Flux is just waaay to heavy to train with current consumer hardware. On the other hand, SXDL is getting really good in the past months so it's enough for most people -myself included-
Details
Files
cyberrealisticXL_v22.safetensors
Mirrors
CyberRealisticXLPlay_V2.2-VAE.safetensors
cyberrealisticXL_v22.safetensors
cyberrealisticXL_v22.safetensors
cyberrealisticXL_v22.safetensors
cyberrealisticXL_v22.safetensors
cyberrealisticXL_v22.safetensors
cyberrealisticXL_v22-mid_312530-vid_709456.safetensors
cyberrealisticXL_v22.safetensors
cyberrealisticXL_v22.safetensors
cyberrealisticXL_v22.safetensors
cyberrealisticXL_v22.safetensors
CyberRealisticXLPlay_V2.2-VAE.safetensors
















