CivArchive
    Preview 7022338
    Preview 7022347
    Preview 7022339
    Preview 7022344
    Preview 7022342
    Preview 7022343
    Preview 7022345
    Preview 7022341
    Preview 7022346
    Preview 7022355
    Preview 7022351
    Preview 7022353
    Preview 7022354
    Preview 7022357
    Preview 7022356
    Preview 7022358
    Preview 7022361
    Preview 7022359

    Updated the Prompting Guide

    For business inquires, commercial licensing, custom models, and consultation contact me under [email protected]

    Join Juggernaut now on X/Twitter

    Juggernaut Ragnarok on RunDiffusion
    Juggernaut XI & XII on RunDiffusion

    Prompting Guide for Juggernaut Ragnarok by Adam

    Prompting Guide by Adam for XI & XII

    Prompting Guidy by Adam for X

    Juggernaut on HuggingFace

    A big thanks goes to RunDiffusion and Adam, who diligently helped me make it work :) (Leave some love for them ;) )

    Hey everyone,

    It’s been 8 months since the last version was released here on CivitAI.
    Of course, I haven’t been idle during that time . I completed several projects to ensure I’d have the financial means to keep exploring new architectures and possibly do full finetunes on them in the future.

    Juggernaut Flux (and its many sub-variants) was a ton of work, but ultimately, I’ve wrapped that chapter up. The training process gave me way too many headaches. To keep my sanity, I spent my spare time working on Juggernaut SDXL with the hope of maybe releasing one final version for you all.
    And that day has finally come. :)

    Juggernaut Ragnarok has improved in many areas: photorealism, digital painting, poses, hands, feet, and much more.
    That said, it’s still an SDXL model, and I don’t recommend comparing it to models like Flux, Reve, or Sora. For example, it still has limitations when it comes to text rendering or faces at a distance.

    I recommend using it as part of a pipeline for your projects. Example setup:
    FluxDev / Pixelwave / Jug Flux ProJuggernaut Ragnarok

    A quick personal note about Juggernaut:
    Honestly, I don’t know what comes next.
    After the release of Sora and similar tools, the open-source image generation space feels a bit dull in comparison.
    Nothing has really excited me enough to dive back into training (yes, I’m talking about HiDream too).
    So I’m seeing Juggernaut Ragnarok as a kind of farewell, especially since it’s unclear where things are headed with CivitAI in general.
    (You can download all Juggernaut versions from HuggingFace, by the way.)

    Last but not least:
    Have fun with the model, share your creations, and good luck with your projects!
    And in case you’re wondering: Yes, you can do anything you want with Juggernaut : merge it, train it, sell the image outputs, etc.
    Just a simple shoutout is all I ask. :)

    And now, here are the recommended settings:

    Res: 832*1216 (For Portrait, but any SDXL Res will work fine)

    Sampler: DPM++ 2M SDE

    Steps: 30-40

    CFG: 3-6 (less is a bit more realistic)

    Negative: Start with no negative, and add afterwards the Stuff you don´t wanna see in that image.

    VAE is already Baked In

    HiRes: 4xNMKD-Siax_200k with 15 Steps and 0.3 Denoise + 1.5 Upscale


    And now, have fun trying it out. As always, I'm eagerly waiting for your pictures in the Gallery :)

    If you liked the model, please leave a Like. In the end, that's what helps me the most as a creator on CivitAI. :)

    Last but not least, I'd like to thank a few people without whom Juggernaut XL probably wouldn't have come to fruition:

    Dreamlook.AI (Trained 3 Side Sets)

    Chillpixel

    SilasAI6609

    Adam

    Description

    V9 merged with the 4 Steps Lightning LoRA

    Recommended Settings:

    Sampler: DPM++ SDE

    Steps: 4-6

    CFG: 1-2

    HiRes:

    Sampler: Siax_200k

    Steps: 2

    Denoise: 0.35

    Upscale: 1.5

    FAQ

    Comments (150)

    DeverFeb 23, 2024· 11 reactions
    CivitAI

    Well that was lightning fast, thanks.

    MrNoirFeb 24, 2024
    CivitAI

    how do you create a lightning model? i have a few models of my own id like to make lightning? i think i need to make them loras and then merge them back into the original model using the basic auto merging at 1 strength?

    KandooAI
    Author
    Feb 24, 2024· 5 reactions

    You can Download the Lightning LoRA´s and Checkpoint on the HuggingFace Site (i linked it in the Description)
    I took the 4 Steps LoRA and merged it into JuggernautXL (SuperMerger). I suggest a strength between 0.6-0.8 .
    Strength 1 was too much (at least for Juggernaut)

    zfreakazoidz496Feb 24, 2024
    CivitAI

    Apologies, I'm new to using Civitai, I hit the download button for this model but nothing happens.

    plalsaga70717Feb 24, 2024

    what browser you use to navigate? i use Microsoft edge.

    zfreakazoidz496Feb 24, 2024

    @plalsaga70717 Tried with Chrome, Firefox and Edge. On Chrome and Edge it downloads but then stops and says network error.

    plalsaga70717Feb 25, 2024

    @zfreakazoidz496 same for me, but i retry and it work,refresh the download button

    realmalikovFeb 24, 2024· 3 reactions
    CivitAI

    The preview images look so incredibly good, I can hardly wait to try it out. 🔥

    ZootAllures9111Feb 25, 2024· 2 reactions
    CivitAI

    Is there going to be a version of this available in the online generator again?

    KandooAI
    Author
    Feb 25, 2024

    V9 is available for Generation again. Seems like it was a Civit mistake (i didnt change anything ;) )

    TigonTXFeb 25, 2024
    CivitAI

    I'm not able to train Loras using Run 9 using Koyha, not sure if anyone else reported that yet, 8 was fine

    KandooAI
    Author
    Feb 25, 2024

    Whats exactly the Problem ?

    HitManLeeFeb 29, 2024· 1 reaction

    @KandooAI Error(s) in loading state_dict for CLIPTextModel:

    Missing key(s) in state_dict: "text_model.embeddings.position_ids".

    HitManLeeFeb 29, 2024· 1 reaction

    same

    KandooAI
    Author
    Mar 1, 2024· 1 reaction

    @HitManLee I got similiar problems with a prior Version of Juggernaut (i think V5). Still to this day i dont know what went wrong. Same this time....
    Last time some Community Members had a solution for it, but i cant find it in the comment section anymore.
    Gonna fix it for V10 of course

    CreatedCryptodFeb 25, 2024· 2 reactions
    CivitAI

    There's an odd issue with this model where the image looks amazing until the very final step, where it becomes nthing but blue static in the shape of the character it was making

    supercalifragiliztic989Feb 25, 2024· 4 reactions

    It seems to be a vae issue. Try bypassing the stable cascade's vae and using the baked in one instead.

    KandooAI
    Author
    Feb 25, 2024· 2 reactions

    It´s 99 % a VAE Issue, just set VAE to "None" or "Automatic" cause the VAE is already baked In the Model :)

    moxie1776Feb 25, 2024

    Are you sure you are using the suggested cfg of 1?

    peopleofpens939Feb 25, 2024· 3 reactions
    CivitAI

    This Lightning model has become my new main SDXL model. Detailed, fast, good prompt understanding and is good with LoRas too.

    idaahmed0404760Feb 26, 2024· 3 reactions
    CivitAI

    Another great model. Sincerely speaking.

    wyxzddsjj919Feb 27, 2024
    CivitAI

    It seems that the Lightning model can only draw real photography STYLE, and it has poor support for other art styles (using STYLE FOOOOC SDXL to check other art style nodes in COMFYUI can not make it draw cartoons, etc.), and entering art style tips in the prompt word input box is still the same. It still produces standard realistic photo styles.Did Lightning LORA mask some data during training to get faster generation speed?Or need special keyword activation?

    KandooAI
    Author
    Feb 27, 2024· 1 reaction

    I would put "Photograph" in the negative.
    Another solution would be to looking at the Gallery below, they are some examples with different Style

    AfgmcMar 4, 2024

    Even with (((realistic, photograph))) in the negative prompt the results are still too photographic. Well, the V9 checkpoint has "photo" in its name so I guess I can't complain too much, but the outputs are just so different from V7, which is what I've been using up to now. Thankfully I have a recent graphics card so it only takes around 20 seconds per image with V7.

    wyxzddsjj919Mar 5, 2024

    @Afgmc It is the low steps and low CFG that cause most of the prompt words to fail

    AfgmcMar 6, 2024

    @wyxzddsjj919 Isn't low steps the whole point of lightning models? Anyway, like I said it's no problem for me to stick with the "snail" models, I just hope the whole ecosystem doesn't switch over to lightning.

    CHNtentesMar 7, 2024

    @wyxzddsjj919 I think you got the point. All turbo/lightning models use 1~2 CFG, which basically ignores prompts. However, if you want less steps you cannot use high CFG since the result will be total crap.

    Allen20Feb 27, 2024· 2 reactions
    CivitAI

    Quick feedback, from J6 to J8 the model kind of lost the creative results favor of realistic pictures now I have been using the J9 and for me It's the best trained XL Model to date previously I was using J5, thanks for keep improving the model

    RunDiffusionMar 7, 2024· 1 reaction

    We’re working on something exciting. Stay tuned.

    Nix0npolskaFeb 27, 2024· 4 reactions
    CivitAI

    What are the advantages of using a lightning version of JuggernautXL instead of previous version(s) of it, just with a Lightning LORA (2/4/6 steps)?

    KandooAI
    Author
    Feb 28, 2024· 9 reactions

    If you are already familiar with the LoRA's, then you don't need to download the Lightning version. There aren't any major advantages for you.

    The version is more intended for people who simply don't want to bother with finding the right settings and prefer a "native" solution. And the demand has basically been there since the first SDXL Turbo release. Lightning was now a good way (without changing the license) to meet this demand. So if you're currently satisfied using the Lightning LoRA's, then you should definitely stick with them.

    In general, however, I wouldn't recommend Lightning, Turbo, or LCM. It ALWAYS comes with a loss of quality (sometimes more, sometimes less), and the overall composition of the images is rather "plain." My recommendation is always: Use the "Normal Version" (in this case V9). In the future, normal checkpoints will continue to be released, whether there will be further Lightning versions ultimately depends on whether the community wants them or not.

    Nix0npolskaFeb 28, 2024· 1 reaction

    @KandooAI Thank you for your thorough answer. Appreciate it <3

    condzero1950Feb 29, 2024

    @KandooAI I am seeing a trend on lightning models to overly smooth human images. Skin texture has all but disappeared.

    KandooAI
    Author
    Feb 29, 2024· 2 reactions

    @condzero1950 You should try the 8 Steps Lightning Lora with 12-15 Steps with Juggernaut. We personally saw that it delievers better skin quality (and details in general)

    condzero1950Feb 29, 2024

    @KandooAI Thank you I will

    jegig41119811Mar 12, 2024

    @KandooAI what about overall ... creativity lets call it. I've tried a few lightning model variants, and also adding a LoRA even on top of the v6, and despite the fact I can still see the same underlying composition the diversity of results is reduced.

    Not sure if it requires a change in prompting or it's the price one pays for distilling the models

    doppel92Feb 28, 2024
    CivitAI

    V9 - how can i describe breastsize without generating nsfw content or plain bras.

    example positve promt: ...big breasts, blue coat, white blouse,...

    generates a girl only wearing blue coat without blouse. sometimes with bra, sometimes without...

    Negative promts with nsfw, nude, topless, naked don't solve the problem

    zx3oFeb 29, 2024

    upper body analog photo of beautiful slavic girl, white hair, gigantic breasts size, blue coat, white blouse with deep cleavage

    Negative prompt: CGI, Unreal, Airbrushed, Digital,

    Steps: 5, Sampler: DPM++ SDE Karras, CFG scale: 2, Seed: 3385708707, Size: 832x1216, Model hash: c8df560d29, Model: juggernautXL_v9Rdphoto2Lightning, Version: v1.7.0

    zx3oFeb 29, 2024

    I dunno, 3 times generated and girl was clothed :D

    cognoscenteMar 1, 2024

    (fully clothed:1.3) and put it closer to the start of your prompt

    ItachinocideMar 2, 2024
    CivitAI

    Using lightning base model better than using 1.0? better results?

    RunDiffusionMar 7, 2024

    1.0? You mean the full version?

    Lightning is faster. Good quality. You’ll always get better quality with the full version v9

    bighugesumo200Mar 2, 2024· 1 reaction
    CivitAI

    cant generate anything yet :(

    jessrloverMar 3, 2024· 3 reactions
    CivitAI

    Can I ask why the previous models were removed from online generation? v7 and v6 are my favorites so really bummed I can't use them anymore! (I don't have the capability to run them locally)

    KandooAI
    Author
    Mar 3, 2024

    It wasnt my choice, you have ask Civit about that.

    valer_85354Mar 8, 2024· 1 reaction

    I loved V7

    Amateur007Mar 4, 2024· 3 reactions
    CivitAI

    Any recommendations to avoid plastic looking skin? v8, I thought was better in that regard. would love to learn how to make v9 work better.

    RunDiffusionMar 7, 2024

    Lower CFG

    Negative prompts “plastic”

    Reinforced Positive prompts like “Detailed skin” help too

    Amateur007Mar 7, 2024

    @RunDiffusion thank you. Will try.

    valer_85354Mar 8, 2024· 1 reaction

    V7 was the best version, the more a new version is released, the less realistic the output is

    Amateur007Mar 8, 2024· 1 reaction

    @valer_85354 is there a way to use v7 to generate? v8 is not available to generate, and so I downloaded the v8 safetensors file and added a new model, but that is also not available to generate. Any advice?

    valer_85354Mar 9, 2024

    @Amateur007 no idea, I was wondering the same. but it's up to civitai to make it available to use here

    UneternalMar 4, 2024
    CivitAI

    Total fan of V9. I just wish Rundiffusion would make the Photo V2 model public. Great merge tho.

    RunDiffusionMar 7, 2024

    RD Photo V1 and V2 anew available on our platform for a really inexpensive price. Need to keep some things behind closed doors. It’s the only way to fund this research with KandooAi. Maybe when we get access to SD3 we’ll open source all the SDXL models. Who knows! As always we appreciate your support!

    user1234123Mar 5, 2024· 4 reactions
    CivitAI

    Can we get a version without the vae baked in? It's creating issues when doing a dreambooth trained model merges with jugg v9 at a low 0.05 (creates white orb artifacts and orange haze) when trying to upscale with supir.

    I like to merge this at a low strength into previous dreambooth checkpoints because it increases the quality a ton, but don't want to retrain them all.

    Also upscaling with supir with a dreambooth model of them makes their likeness present much more.

    akirathompson936Mar 5, 2024
    CivitAI

    So the only way we can run this is through RunDiffusion? No way to run locally on A1111 or ComfyUI?

    gokhanh3333Mar 5, 2024

    You can run on ComfyUI. I use it.

    adityarathiMar 6, 2024

    @gokhanh3333 I have a workflow that works with other realistic models but when I use this I get Error occurred when executing VAEDecode. any clue why?

    KandooAI
    Author
    Mar 6, 2024

    @akirathompson936 You can download it and use it locally like any other model

    J19ZMar 7, 2024

    I tried with A1111 and seem like im having some memory issues : "OutOfMemoryError: CUDA out of memory. Tried to allocate 40.00 MiB. GPU 0 has a total capacty of 8.00 GiB of which 0 bytes is free. Of the allocated memory 6.83 GiB is allocated by PyTorch, and 476.19 MiB is reserved by PyTorch but unallocated. If reserved but unallocated memory is large try setting max_split_size_mb to avoid fragmentation. See documentation for Memory Management and PYTORCH_CUDA_ALLOC_CONF"

    fronyaxMar 8, 2024

    @J19Z A1111 is bad in handling memory, Try use sdwebui forge, there is an integrated extention called "neverOOM" that can save vram, so Out Of Memory error would not happen frequently. Enable the extention before generate an img.

    Meaca_GMar 7, 2024· 2 reactions
    CivitAI

    I'm having real trouble with the eyes, one is always rather misshapen or lighter/darker colour

    FufuuuMar 9, 2024· 10 reactions
    CivitAI

    First of all, I realy love ur models <3
    But ur V8 gives me far more better results in realistic people especially way more better eyes... keep up the good work <3

    zengdamo463Mar 12, 2024
    CivitAI

    What is the best parameter configuration in ComfyUI? I used the latest version, but the generated images are very poor. For example, what would be the most suitable configuration for a general image generation user for sampler/scheduler/steps, etc.?

    kkstablediff329Mar 15, 2024

    Assuming you are using "juggernautXL_v9Rdphoto2Lightning.safetensors", try steps: 5, cfg: 2, sampler: dpmpp_sde, schedular: karras. Use a latent of width: 832 and height: 1216. This produces great results for me, but do experiment with steps and cfg. Also, depends on what you are trying to make, not all checkpoints are suited for all things, though this one is pretty robust.

    yofoton174609Mar 13, 2024· 2 reactions
    CivitAI

    We need juggernaut Stable Cascade !! :D lets gooo

    KandooAI
    Author
    Mar 13, 2024· 1 reaction

    I really wanted to, but without a Commercial License and SD3 coming its a pretty much Dead Usecase for me.

    yofoton174609Mar 14, 2024

    @KandooAI i agree, so what are you going to do next then, just wait for sd3?

    KandooAI
    Author
    Mar 15, 2024

    @yofoton174609 Right now i retrain the JuggernautXL Base with GPT4 Captions and after that prob waiting for SD3

    yofoton174609Mar 15, 2024

    @KandooAI ok good idea. look up the proteus model, its pretty good as well. i think it was captioned by gpt :D

    Amateur007Mar 15, 2024· 4 reactions
    CivitAI

    XL9 has been rendering skins in an absolutely delightful way (at CFG 4). The trouble I’m running into are with fingers (fused, deformed, extra etc). Any prompts I put in, positive or negative, only seem to aggravate the problem or at best no impact. Any recommendation? Is there an optimal number for the steps I should use? Specific prompts?

    doctorjh7950Mar 19, 2024

    controlnet

    rastoboyMar 15, 2024
    CivitAI

    hmm using the recommended cfg scale and sampling steps, but everything is coming out looking like early DALL-E. anybody have any hints what i'm doing wrong? Using SDXL VAE.

    https://imgur.com/a/bjP8Wbe

    kismeMar 15, 2024

    are you using SD1.5 LoRAs or embeddings by any chance? this looks pretty fucked up. or perhaps your VAE? try setting it to "automatic"

    rastoboyMar 15, 2024

    nope, at least not that i know of. are there different SDXL VAE's?

    rastoboyMar 15, 2024

    actually just realized i don't know where some of the recommended settings are? Sampler: Siax_200k

    Steps: 2

    Denoise: 0.35

    Upscale: 1.5

    rastoboyMar 15, 2024

    ok found the stuff under hires fix, but i can't find where that sampler is set...it's not in any of the dropdowns i can find. Sampler: Siax_200k?

    peopleofpens939Mar 15, 2024· 1 reaction

    @rastoboy for the image use 4- 6 steps, in the hires fix tab use 2 steps for upscale. images should come out better.

    nickartistMar 16, 2024
    CivitAI

    I have a really big problem with negative prompts. I add the words but it doesn't remove the object and even worse, it guarantees that all the images have it

    davy272Mar 22, 2024

    If you put (hat) in negative prompt, it should remove hats. What happens if you put (no hat) in negative prompts? Does the double-negative come out as a positive? Is that what you're doing?

    RheisSivviMar 23, 2024· 1 reaction

    Be sure that you are making affirmations only on the negative prompt. If you write (hat), you are basically saying "I don't want hats in this picture". If you write (no hat), you are saying "I don't want a picture without a hat". Also, a good technique is to write with hyphens, it makes what you write explicit. A prompt saying "a-woman-wearing-a-hat" is explicitly sayin "I want a woman wearing a hat, do not do anything other than that". Hope this helps!

    AneleMelchiorreMar 17, 2024· 2 reactions
    CivitAI

    Why do many people use DPM++ 2M Karras instead of DPM++ 3M SDE Exponential?

    RoscosmosMar 18, 2024· 1 reaction

    Personally I prefer the image compositions produced by 3M samplers but I think the colors are more consistent with 2M, less artifacts.

    Bra2haMar 18, 2024· 2 reactions

    Why DPM++ 3M SDE Exponential?

    AneleMelchiorreMar 18, 2024

    @Bra2ha On paper everyone has all the requirements to be superior to others

    Bra2haMar 18, 2024· 1 reaction

    @anelesmelchiorre Can you elaborate?

    Pres929Mar 20, 2024· 2 reactions

    In Automatic1111, I believe DPM++ 2M Karras is the default. Probably why so many use it, by default. ;) For me, I tried a bunch of them on image gens I liked, then judged on that. For me, I actually do like the default best. If I switch to DPM++ 3M SDE Exponential now, I'm so used to DPM++ 2M Karras that all the faces and stuff just look a bit "off", so back to DPM++ 2M Karras. :D

    tl;dr: Use whatever you think looks best for your art and don't worry about others.

    3265390Mar 22, 2024

    Run an xy plot and see what you like. It's all up to so many different factors, model, cfg, settings.. turbo, lightning, 1.5, sdxl.. etc..

    ZUSIMOMar 22, 2024· 2 reactions

    @anelesmelchiorre Also on paper, everyone has the requirements to sound sarcastic and not be taken serious, like your self.

    RheisSivviMar 19, 2024
    CivitAI

    Hi! I've always loved Juggernaut and I use all of its versions! However, I'm noticing a tendency to make sexy images with the Lightning model, and I need to make modest ones (for a book illustration). Has anyone faced this, or know how to fix it?

    davy272Mar 22, 2024

    Strong negative prompts?

    RheisSivviMar 22, 2024

    @davy272 I've tried negative prompts of all kinds, but I couldn't get it to make like I want it without creating distortions or the model simply ignoring me.

    davy272Mar 22, 2024

    @RheisSivvi  Which lightning model? You're using it with Juggernaut? (XL?) Or instead of?
    What is it supposed to bring to an image? Is it simply just default lightning in images, or something more... structural, ie a model, not a LoRA?

    I've never found Juggernaut XL to be particularly lewd. In fact, I had to work hard to prevent it being extremely tame. (reverse of your issue, I know).

    Distortions and/or ignoring of a prompt always makes me check the CFG and steps, and that's almost always the issue. Only a couple of times has a LoRA caused it to go haywire.
    Sorry I can't be much help.

    schieloMar 19, 2024· 3 reactions
    CivitAI

    Fantastic model! I used it for an audio reactive Deforum clip (GTA/Miami Vice style): https://youtu.be/YDKSxK7I4ek

    log11Mar 22, 2024· 2 reactions
    CivitAI

    V6 and below was better. V9 is clearly biased toward the author's preferences. I have to fight it so much to produce what I actually want.

    Art0rithmMar 22, 2024

    Yes. It's definitely harder and harder to get anything other than photorealistic since then. It's sad because it was so good overall model not just photo one.

    KandooAI
    Author
    Mar 22, 2024· 7 reactions

    @Art0rithm 
    Version X will be going "Back to the Roots." I've completely recaptioned the basic set of Juggernaut with GPT-4 Vision. The training for the SFW version is already complete, and we are currently in the testing phase. Since I've also restructured the dataset simultaneously, we've found in initial tests that it performs very well in its core areas (photographs, photorealism) and can also accommodate a wide variety of other art styles. However, the biggest plus of Version X will likely be the Prompt Guidance. Here, we've seen very good results, though not on the Dall-E level (I'm just one guy and have a limited budget ;) ) But it's significantly better than in all previous versions of Juggernaut. If you want to check out some pictures, you'll find them occasionally on the Twitter/X account.

    amazingbeautyMar 28, 2024

    tell more please..

    FunPea523250Mar 22, 2024· 1 reaction
    CivitAI

    A splendid model, thanks

    KandooAI
    Author
    Mar 22, 2024· 32 reactions
    CivitAI

    Update:

    Several weeks have passed again, and I wanted to share with you what's happening behind the scenes and what the future plans are. Let's start with Juggernaut and the upcoming version.

    Version X has been completely recaptioned from scratch with GPT-4 Vision. I've tried dozens of captioning tools in the past, but not a single one comes close to being as accurate as GPT-4 Vision. At the same time, I've restructured the dataset to better separate SFW and NSFW content in the future. The training itself has now been completed, and after a long search, we found the right checkpoint and are currently in the testing phase (you can find pictures on the Twitter account :) ) Initial tests have shown that Version X adheres to the prompt significantly more accurately than all previous Juggernaut versions. This ultimately confirmed that it was the right decision to start over with GPT-4 Vision captions. Version X excels in delivering high-quality photographic output while also being very versatile in other ART directions. The SFW version will be available on RunDiffusion after the testing phase. The NSFW version will follow shortly after here on CivitAI.

    Regarding the future: We will continue with SDXL for now, as there is still much untapped potential that I want to explore. Version X provides an excellent basis for future updates. After much consideration, I have decided not to fine-tune Stable Cascade. This is partly due to further SDXL updates and the upcoming SD3. Additionally, there is no possibility for a commercial license, which is personally a no-go for me. Since the Cascade team has already ceased its work for SAI, I don't expect this to change.

    In short: We will continue with SDXL and hopefully with SD3 in the future :)

    MatorinaDaddyMar 22, 2024

    Only waiting for NSFW thanks King

    Durango321Mar 22, 2024· 1 reaction

    Thank you for everything you do for the community from the bottom of my heart.

    3012127Mar 22, 2024

    It's truly sad you won't be doing a cascade version, but going for SDXL on the long run is definitely a wise choice. Putting the commercial use issues aside; working with a well-tested base model is better than inventing the testing wheel all over again with a totally new model.

    GodOfSmethingMar 26, 2024

    Keep up the good work, this is hands down the best model on civitai!

    GodOfSmethingMar 26, 2024

    I'd just like to say 1 thing; the model doesn't generate good male reproductive organ. Female reproductive organ generated are pretty good, but when it comes to male, it is lacking! We'd really appreciate if you can work on that!

    3012127Mar 26, 2024

    @GodOfSmething The model is not aimed for NSFW, but the creating is aiming for a separate NSFW one in the next version, i'm waiting for it too!

    isr431Mar 31, 2024

    @KandooAI you said "The SFW version will be available on RunDiffusion after the testing phase. The NSFW version will follow shortly after here on CivitAI", does that mean only the NSFW version will be released here, or that it will the SFW version will arrive later?

    ImAbbieKittenMar 31, 2024

    What's the Twitter account?

    isr431Apr 1, 2024· 1 reaction
    Milessa_AigenMar 23, 2024· 1 reaction
    CivitAI

    THIS FKING BEST <3

    sikasolutionsworldwide709Mar 24, 2024
    CivitAI

    Problem with 9:16 image generation: I see a lot of 9:16 img in the showcase but if I set the base format to 1024:1536 or 960:1440 I get 2 faces deformed imgages. Any advices? Ty

    fredsaliasMar 24, 2024

    I get that occasionally too, with a variety of models. Solo and multiple or 2 in the positive/negative as appropriate - and a fair bit of just rolling again. :-)

    fredsaliasMar 24, 2024

    If it helps, I just posted some images in 9:16(https://civitai.com/posts/1840089). I had no issues...but also didn't use any of what I said previously, so maybe ignore that, hah. My prompts are in the post, rather than the image - maybe they'll be of use.

    wedrownyeliteMar 27, 2024
    CivitAI

    Blurred backgrounds. Any way to unblur the background of generated pictures? My prompt is "(((selfie))), ((close-up)), no blur, soft closed smile, long hair in a messy bun, night time, perky breasts, running on a treadmill in a gym, blue and black sports bra, <lora:detailed_notrigger:0.2>, nsfw, high contrast, realistic color scheme, 4K HD, super realistic" and negative is "makeup, (blur), pink, bad anatomy, super model, perfect skin, unrealistic, saturated, high contrast, big nose, painting, drawing, sketch, cartoon, anime, manga, render, CG, 3d, watermark, signature, label, airbrushed, digital" but I still get a blurry background. Using Juggernaut XL, and realisticStockPhotos as my refiner which came with Fooocus

    doctorjh7950Mar 27, 2024
    CivitAI

    this model is currently not visible, only discoverable when searching

    amazingbeautyMar 28, 2024
    CivitAI

    is JuggernautXL V9 + RunDiffusion Photo 2 will work with lighning lora? thanks.

    vmouse7Mar 30, 2024· 1 reaction
    CivitAI

    i get distorted images with the loras i have trained.

    AneleMelchiorreMar 31, 2024· 7 reactions
    CivitAI

    Too bad! Unfortunately the physiognomy changes too much compared to version 8. I don't like it!

    lucidzachary473Apr 4, 2024

    Not sure if you're talking about ethnic diversity or not, That's a great thing and something most checkpoints lack a lot. That aside, I much prefer version 8 in my testing.

    rastoboyMar 31, 2024
    CivitAI

    any tips on getting the camera angle to behave? none of my techniques i've used with other models are working, such as "side view" or "rear view". even if i weight the heck out of them.

    blacisApr 1, 2024

    Use real life or 3d models images as reference for image prompt and PyraCanny.

    rastoboyApr 1, 2024

    oh sorry i probably should have mentioned i'm doing txt2image

    rastoboyApr 1, 2024

    i do see that it works ok with very short prompts....but not longer ones.

    blacisApr 1, 2024

    @rastoboy it's fine even with longer ones, it all depends on what your trying achieve. https://github.com/lllyasviel/Fooocus/discussions/557

    rastoboyApr 1, 2024

    @blacis or i guess what you're saying is that's a better technique. google is amazingly short of information on what PyraCanny is...gotta link by any chance?

    3012127Apr 5, 2024

    @rastoboy I recommend using the model in comfy, and implement openpose + canny + zoe depth map control nets for an image you want to replicate. SD in general is still open source can be rigid sometimes when it comes to regular prompting.

    dimito92Apr 2, 2024· 3 reactions
    CivitAI

    my favourite model :D

    JusterinoApr 4, 2024· 2 reactions
    CivitAI

    woooow. looking good.

    storm9999Apr 4, 2024· 1 reaction
    CivitAI

    Only with this model I have the following error, does this happen to anybody else ?

    NansException: A tensor with all NaNs was produced in Unet

    Beast01Apr 5, 2024· 8 reactions
    CivitAI

    When will you released Juggernaut XL v10.0?
    if it's not ready then how much progress complete?

    KandooAI
    Author
    Apr 8, 2024· 14 reactions

    I finished the NSFW Set yesterday evening...we are now in the testing phase. Cant say a specific date yet, but its on the horizon...prob 10-14 days max

    StreamTabulousApr 12, 2024· 1 reaction

    @KandooAI hope a lightning model for us with old hardware, also finding models are single character is hard to do a (cat behind a mouse) seem to get merge creature

    3012127Apr 5, 2024· 3 reactions
    CivitAI

    Concerning version X, do we have to caption our loras with something detailed like gpt vision or llava in order to be suited for the caption level of the version? or regular blip captions should just work fine?

    KandooAI
    Author
    Apr 8, 2024· 1 reaction

    Best Way Scenario: Yeah you do that
    But its not 100 % needed, it will still work fine with Blip2,WD etc.

    982932932Apr 11, 2024· 1 reaction
    CivitAI

    Why only with this model ControlNet openpose doesn't work?

    2793679336zz633Apr 17, 2024

    me to

    mostafahazim18855Apr 19, 2024

    the same any solution ?

    GoodnightRockApr 11, 2024
    CivitAI

    I like the versatility of this model but my product needs to support generating a range of ethnicities and this model struggles with young black males with short fade haircuts, including children. Struggles with any skin tone darker than a light brown. If anyone knows a workaround, please let me know.

    dmitridbApr 12, 2024

    im still not sure with sdxl the exact way to do this but if you're looking for better racial representation adding noise to the image helps. its generally how to get things darker. how to get that isn't so straightforward i'm on the path to figuring out the same thing but it was pretty easy in 1.5. might need to go further and composite characters generated with seperate weights on the noise from their environment if it's light out though as doing this tends to affect things like shadows

    escalate007Apr 12, 2024· 1 reaction
    CivitAI

    so cool, I have to give 5 stars for your nice work!!

    promptkidApr 15, 2024· 3 reactions
    CivitAI

    It produces some of the most realistic images I've seen using AI, but if you reading it, is planning to make adult stuff, you'll probably have a hard time. In my test, the model tends to "censor" (not exactly the case, it was just not trained for this, I suppose) any kind of adult stuff, except for basic female nudity. I tried it with a specific x-rated lora and it had no effect, even trying to refine the results with another model.

    espensales719Apr 17, 2024
    CivitAI

    Great model! Any info on optimal landscape resolutions?

    KandooAI
    Author
    Apr 18, 2024· 35 reactions
    CivitAI

    Update:

    Wait Time is over :) Version X (NSFW) is going to be released on Saturday.
    If you want a Safer Version you can run it on RunDiffusion then :)

    Tomorrow i am gonna release a PDF that will help u with the prompting on Jug X (it isnt complicated i promise ;) )

    Cant wait to hear your Feedback about the Rework :)

    plechack530Apr 18, 2024

    Can't wait!

    civitai6999Apr 19, 2024

    will it support inpaint

    yofoton174609Apr 19, 2024

    juggernaut is the king of sdxl derivatives

    KandooAI
    Author
    Apr 20, 2024· 1 reaction

    @civitai6999 Here is a Inpaint Version for Version X : https://civitai.com/models/403361?modelVersionId=456538

    4113592Apr 19, 2024
    CivitAI

    accurate with prompts, very realistic images, i am courius about the version X!

    KandooAI
    Author
    Apr 19, 2024· 11 reactions
    CivitAI

    Update

    Like promised i linked a Prompting Guide for Version X in the Description. Nothing Special, but it should help you guys to have a better experience with Juggernaut from the Start :)

    Prompting Guide

    joshua980Apr 19, 2024· 1 reaction

    can not wait to try version X!!!

    Checkpoint
    SDXL Lightning

    Details

    Downloads
    154,452
    Platform
    CivitAI
    Platform Status
    Available
    Created
    2/23/2024
    Updated
    5/19/2026
    Deleted
    -

    Files

    juggernautXL_v9Rdphoto2Lightning.safetensors

    Mirrors

    HuggingFace (36 mirrors)