CivArchive
    Preview 56849811
    Preview 56852090
    Preview 56855193
    Preview 56964461
    Preview 56964557
    Preview 56964592
    Preview 56964681
    Preview 56967942
    Preview 56967980
    Preview 57034052
    Preview 57033796
    Preview 57757413
    Preview 57757412
    Preview 57757411
    Preview 59701664
    Preview 59702073
    Preview 60333839
    Preview 60520221
    Preview 61940064
    Preview 61940068

    I have trained Flux Dev on my SDXL dataset and merged loras, correcting anatomy censorship and excessive bokeh/blurred backgrounds.

    V12 - Merge with SRPO model and some loras, a bit cleaner looking than previous models, might want to use some grain loras if you want that amateur look.


    I think not as good at NSFW so might want to use my lora for that: https://civarchive.com/models/652791/jibs-flux-nipple-fix


    Jib Mix Flux v8-Flash! SVDQuant-4bit

    Update 06/04/2025 - NOW WITH CONTROLNET AND NATIVE LORA SUPPORT!
    This new SVDQuant format currently requires ComfyUI and an Nvidia 2000 series+ GPU.

    I recommend;

    Guidance scale = 2.5-3.5

    Sampler = dpmpp_2m.

    Scheduler = Sgm_uniform, Beta or Custom Stigmas.

    This model is a new format that is a little tricky to first get setup but it is worth it as you can make flux images super fast (5 seconds on a 3090, 2.5 sevonds on a 4090 and 0.8 seconds on 5090! at 10 steps) ,
    You need to install the nunchaku project following the instructions there.

    and the nunchaku ComfyUI custom nodes to get it to work.
    Download and unzip the archive from Civitai to: \comfyui.git\app\models\diffusion_models\jib-mix-svdq\

    This is the Nunchaku workflow I am using: https://civarchive.com/models/617562

    Thanks a lot to theunlikely for running the Quantization which takes an H100 GPU 6 hours!

    Unfortunately, it seems the NSFW capabilities are reduced by the quantisation but can be bought back with my NSFW Lora you need to use the Nunchaku lora loader in the node pack and it will auto convert the lora for use the first time (and optionally can be saved).

    There is currently a size limit above 2 million pixels 1024 x 2048 that causes a crash in ComfyUI, so if you get that lower your gen/upscale resolution, The Developers say a fix will be released this week.


    Jib Mix Flux Version 8 AccentuEight


    Much better Skin texture than Jib Mix Flux V7 but without the bad Flux Lines of Jib Mix V6.

    NSFW anatomy is slightly lacking so I have uploaded a separate NSFW model that has very slightly reduced details / artstyles or loras can be used.

    The V8 Pruned Model nf4 (6.33 GB) model is actually the Q4_0.gguf

    The V8 Pruned Model bf16 (11.84 GB) model is actually the Q8_0.gguf

    15/04/2025 - The new fp16 version of V8 provides very slightly better details and anatomical and image consistency, if you have the VRAM for it....


    Jib Mix Flux Version 8 AccentuEight NSFW

    Better female anatomy with a slight loss in skin details.

    The V8 NSFW Pruned Model nf4 (6.33 GB) model is actually a Q4_0.gguf


    Jib Mix Flux Version 7.8 Clear Text Focus

    This version focuses on having more readable text generation.
    The Skin texture may not be generally as realistic as Jib Mix v6 or v7.

    It has less nipple flashing through clothes.

    The 2000s Analog Core @0.6 weight, removes some of the plastic Fluxness of this merge without hurting the text.


    Jib Mix Flux Version 7.2 Pixel Heaven

    7/7.2 mainly fixes "Flux Line" caused by merging some effected lora's, this has caused some drop in photo realism but an increase in drawn/concept ability and general details.

    It also tones down obsessive amounts of freckles (especially red freckles).

    The V7.2 Pruned Model nf4 (6.33 GB) model is actually the Q4_0.gguf

    The V7.2 Pruned Model bf16 (11.84 GB) model is actually the Q8_0.gguf


    Jib Mix Flux version 7 PixelHeaven - beta
    The main change is it removes "Flux lines" that plagued V6 and the original Flux Dev to some extent.

    It may be overdoing freckles a lot but I wanted to see what people think of it. hence the Beta name.

    I really recommend using Movie Portrait Lora on quite a high weight for a less plastic look, but I couldn't merge it into the model as in testing it was a Lora that can cause "Flux Lines"


    Jib Mix Flux Version 6.1 Real Pix Fixed

    6.1 mainly tries to fix small stubby hands or massively distorted hands/arms.
    (If you still have problems with hands and you are using a low step count around 8 then increasing the step count usually fixes it alternatively applying a low weight (< 0.10) of the Hyper Flux lora pretty much always fixes hands, although you may find it lowers details).

    V6.1 is more realistic on the CFG / more natural faces.

    I think it actually does art/cartoon styles a bit better than the original v6 as well.

    The V6.1 Pruned Model nf4 (6.33 GB) model is actually the Q4_0.gguf

    The V6.1 Pruned Model bf16 (11.84 GB) model is actually the Q8_0.gguf


    V6 still has the most detailed backgrounds in my testing.

    The V6 Pruned Model nf4 (11.84 GB) model is actually Q8_0.gguf

    The V6 Pruned Model bf16 (6.33 GB) model is actually a Q4_0.gguf


    Jib Mix Flux Version 5 - It's Alive:

    • Improved photorealism. (Less likely to default to painting styles)

    • Fixed issues with wonky text.

    • More detailed backgrounds

    • Reconfigured NSWF slightly


    fp8 V4 Canvas Galore:
    better fine details and much better artistic styles, and improved NSFW capabilities.


    fp8 V3.0 V3.1 - Clarity Key
    I initially uploaded the wrong model file on the 21/10/2024, it was very similar but the new file since 22/10/2024 has slightly better contrast and was used for the sample images.

    This version Improves detail levels and has a more cinematic feel like the original flux dev.

    reduced the "Flux Chin"

    Settings - I use a Flux Guidance of 2.9
    Sampler = dpmpp_2m.

    Scheduler = Beta or Custom Stigmas.


    FP8 V2 - Electric Boogaloo: Better NSFW and skin/image quality.

    Settings:
    I find the best settings are a guidance and 2.5 and a CFG of 2.8 (although CFG does slow down the generation).
    When using Loras these values may/will change.

    Version: mx5 GGUF 7GB v1

    This is a quantized version of my Flux model to run on lower-end graphics cards.

    Thanks to @https://civarchive.com/user/chrisgoringe243 for quantizing this, it is really good quality for such a small model.

    There are larger-sized GGUF versions available here: https://huggingface.co/ChrisGoringe/MixedQuantFlux/tree/main
    for mid-range graphics cards.

    Version 2 - fp16:

    For those with high Vram Cards who want maximum quality I have created this merge with the full fp16 Flux model. if you "only have 24GB of Vram" you will need to force the T5 text encoder onto the CPU/System RAM with this force node on this pack:
    https://github.com/city96/ComfyUI_ExtraModels

    Those people waiting for a smaller quantized model I am still looking into it.

    Version 2:

    Merged in 8 Step Hyper Lora and some others.

    Settings:
    I like a Guidance of 2 and 8-14 steps.

    Resolution: I like a around 1280x1344

    Version 1 : brings some of the benefits and look of SDXL with the massive prompt adherence benefits of Flux.
    Settings:
    I like a Guidance of 2 and 20-40 steps.

    Description

    Has better NSWF than v8 at the cost of some detail (I would say about 10% less).

    FAQ

    Comments (45)

    BinaryBottleBakeFeb 10, 2025· 1 reaction
    CivitAI

    I see V8 is on Tensor.art, will you also upload the NSFW version there?

    J1B
    Author
    Feb 10, 2025

    Yes, doing it now, I just ran out of time yesterday.

    J1B
    Author
    Feb 10, 2025
    97BuckeyeFeb 10, 2025
    CivitAI

    Is there a reason why the V8 NSFW model has less detail than the standard V8 model? I mean, obviously, there's a reason, but would you mind explaining the choice in trade-off? I would love to be able to "have my cake and eat it too".

    J1B
    Author
    Feb 10, 2025· 5 reactions

    My theory is that the training data for NSFW brings the quality down slightly as it has less detail, as it will contain mainly faces of younger people with possibly wearing a lot of makeup, rather than older people with a lot of skin texture. Maybe more regularisation images in the NSFW training set would help have both, I will do some experimentation, it was a last min decision to split them out when I saw that the best best quality was achieved before the NSFW data was added

    97BuckeyeFeb 13, 2025

    @J1B Thank you for the explanation. That makes a lot of sense. If you could somehow figure out a wave to have them both, that would be perfect. Your explanation actually helps me to understand why the models I feel are most detailed and realistic tend to have not great NSFW images.

    Jack_FryFeb 10, 2025· 3 reactions
    CivitAI

    Would love to see Jib trained on top of the new Flux Sigma Vision de-distilled

    WyvernDrykeFeb 13, 2025

    wait what? there's a Flux Sigma?

    mmdd2543Feb 10, 2025· 1 reaction
    CivitAI

    V8 looks like a big step up! I would love to try it out. BTW, It seems to me that the preview images were upscaled, is that correct? If yes, is it possible for you to post some images that were generated at the native resolution without upscaling to see how it performs at native resolutions? Thanks in advance! :)

    J1B
    Author
    Feb 10, 2025

    Yes, I have always upscaled pretty much all my images before uploading them, but it doesn't make as much difference with Flux as I generate them at approx. 1280x1500 anyway.
    Here I have uploaded a set without any Upscaling step so you can look at them.

    https://civitai.com/posts/12767086

    mmdd2543Feb 10, 2025

    @J1B I see. These look fantastic! Thanks for sharing!

    diogodFeb 10, 2025· 4 reactions
    CivitAI

    When you say NSFW you mean just girls right? I'm not necessarily talking about penises here (because we have some great loras for that), but nude male bodies are not included right?

    This is important to know because it would make very feminine faces and bodies overall.

    J1B
    Author
    Feb 10, 2025· 1 reaction

    Basically yes, It can only do female anatomy without a lora, but the NSFW version still seems to be able to do male faces well. It always seems to give the a beard as Flux likes to do.

    WyvernDrykeFeb 13, 2025

    No we don't! Half of the penis LoRAs don't work right, or only work with specific checkpoints.
    pulls out his "We Need More Pen0r" sign, marches back and forth with it

    diogodFeb 13, 2025· 2 reactions

    @WyvernDryke We sure need more! Lol. But xpenis uncut for me is kind of a miracle that we already have something that good. Combine it with AndroFlux each at around 0.6 or something and you can get hard-ons that looks great very easily. We took ages to get a good penis LoRA with SDXL

    diogodFeb 13, 2025· 1 reaction

    @MoudaH why are f downvoting me? I just asked a question.

    condzero1950Feb 11, 2025· 4 reactions
    CivitAI

    would be nice if you offered a fp16 version of this. these stripped down versions would lack a bit of quality, don't you think?

    J1B
    Author
    Feb 11, 2025· 2 reactions

    I have occasionally offered an fp16 version, but I cannot tell the difference in quality and mainly it takes up too much storage when I am making the models as I think I have 50 different versions of V8 before deciding on the best one and my 12 TB of SSD's are usually pretty full already.

    condzero1950Feb 14, 2025· 1 reaction

    @J1B I understand. I shoot for quality as I'm not as constrained as you.

    WyvernDrykeFeb 13, 2025· 1 reaction
    CivitAI

    oh hot damn, another JibMix! I am so psyched :D

    Hey question, what are these "Flux Lines" you keep mentioning?

    J1B
    Author
    Feb 13, 2025· 1 reaction

    They are artifacts in a Flux image model or LoRA typically appear as unwanted streaks, unnatural banding, or distortions that are a result of training instability, overfitting, or data bias. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xUeaJ6bd33E

    WyvernDrykeFeb 13, 2025

    @J1B oh cool! thank you :)

    Samsam77Feb 13, 2025· 4 reactions
    CivitAI

    fp16 pls !!!

    UniversealFeb 13, 2025
    CivitAI

    For me v8 it has a lot of artefacts in midtones.

    J1B
    Author
    Feb 13, 2025

    Can you post any examples and the settings/workflow you are using? Is it Flux lines?

    fg987Feb 14, 2025· 4 reactions
    CivitAI

    I use your Flux 6.1 RealPixFixed, with excellent results, and apply film grains to solve Flux issues.

    I use a Lora that I trained at Fluxgym, using fluxdev, and it works very well with Flux 6.1. Instagram @lauren_lora_ia.

    When I use version 8, it loses the Lora, completely changes the model's face and also loses consistency, it doesn't do the same model twice. Is there any way to solve this?

    J1B
    Author
    Feb 19, 2025· 1 reaction

    I have been doing some testing after you said https://civitai.com/posts/13160017 and yes maybe lora compatibility is not as good in v8, probably because its "genetics" are further a way from Flux Dev, it looks like Jib Mix Flux Version 7.8 Clear Text Focus has the best likeness, but that has the Flux skin so is probably closer to Flux dev. I guess the only way to get perfect likeness with Jib Mix Flux v8 would be to train the lora against that checkpoint, but it becomes a lot less flexible then as it might not work as well on other checkpoints.

    5516140Feb 17, 2025
    CivitAI

    I'm downloading the nf4 6.3gb gguf, do i need to add vae and text-encoders separately in the workflow? Btw, nice skin texture and facial symmetry by the look of image posts.

    J1B
    Author
    Feb 20, 2025· 1 reaction

    Yes, you need them separately, they are exclude to keep the model size more compact.

    Use these instructions if using Forge: https://civitai.com/articles/7828/simple-setting-forge-ui-for-runing-flux-no-include-vae-and-clip

    olternautFeb 21, 2025
    CivitAI

    Do I need to actually download the clip1, T5 and flux VAE files separately to run this on ForgeUI?

    EternalCyclicFeb 26, 2025· 1 reaction
    CivitAI

    Is there no Q4_0.gguf for NSFW variant?

    J1B
    Author
    Feb 26, 2025· 1 reaction

    I can make that for you.

    J1B
    Author
    Feb 27, 2025· 3 reactions
    xpnrtMar 7, 2025
    CivitAI

    Recently found someone do q8 gguf from f32, same size as fp8 and for example your q8 but yours is from fp16. It runs at the same speed in the end, is it possible for you to try this with your model ?

    here is how comfy sees that gguf :

    GGMLQuantizationType.F32 471

    GGMLQuantizationType.Q8_0 304

    GGMLQuantizationType.F16 5

    And here is your 11gb q8 gguf :

    GGMLQuantizationType.F16 476

    GGMLQuantizationType.Q8_0 304

    Can you try this , in the end we might get slightly better quality at the same file size and speed than the default fp8 models.

    J1B
    Author
    Mar 7, 2025

    The original Flux Dev model was trained in FP16, meaning the extra precision from FP32 was never there to begin with.

    Converting FP16 → FP32 doesn’t magically restore lost precision. It just pads the numbers with extra zeros or minor approximations.
    In my somewhat expert opinion (and I asked ChatGPT to confirm it) upcasting FP16 to FP32 before quantizing to Q8 is not worth it
    If you're curious, though, I could maybe run a comparison test. But I’d bet the results would be identical!

    xpnrtMar 7, 2025

    @J1B I don't know anything about insides of the models and training process, to be clear I tested this model : https://civitai.com/models/1218256?modelVersionId=1443462 . Normally everyone does it like yours, a mix of fp16 and sometimes bf16. But this was different and 8 step results are rather good, so without any technical knowledge thought maybe that effected the results in a positive way. Of course you guys know best.

    qxcMar 9, 2025
    CivitAI

    could you provide nf4 in sft file format? gguf is slower. besides, why is gguf nf4 instead bf16?

    darothMar 13, 2025· 3 reactions
    CivitAI

    This is one of the best Flux checkpoints I've seen. Out of curiosity I made a 50-50 merge with Ultrareal Finetune v4 and it fixed ALL my problems with Flux. The plastic-y overprocessed look, the super agressive bokeh - it just looks so much more real. Thanks for making this

    jbrichezMar 29, 2025

    Hey ! How did you archieve to merge 50/50 ?

    darothMar 30, 2025· 1 reaction

    @jbrichez Two Load Checkpoint nodes going into a Model Merge Simple node which goes into a Model Save node

    fluxxesMar 14, 2025· 1 reaction
    CivitAI

    superb model. but can u upload on hugging face so we can train out of it?

    J1B
    Author
    Mar 21, 2025

    Hi, I do have a older version of this model uploaded on Hugging face: https://huggingface.co/jibhug/Jib_Mix_Flux_v3_Clarity_Key

    But I will try and get version 8 uploaded today as well.

    aitrancerApr 9, 2025

    I think you also need a full model to train on, not the pruned versions that are available here? The only full model i can find here is v6

    GoodPromptMar 17, 2025· 1 reaction
    CivitAI

    Thank you for sharing your model.

    Checkpoint
    Flux.1 D
    by J1B

    Details

    Downloads
    5,906
    Platform
    CivitAI
    Platform Status
    Available
    Created
    2/9/2025
    Updated
    5/12/2026
    Deleted
    -

    Available On (1 platform)

    Same model published on other platforms. May have additional downloads or version variants.