Update 19.06.2026. Lustify V9 (Zenith) IS OUT!
This is the absolute final version of Lustify built on the SDXL architecture. You can find the full changelog and a breakdown of the new features there. <----------
Recommended Workflow.
Alternative Access & Support: Outside of CivitAI's Early Access, you can get the model via my Boosty.
Just like last time, after the early access ends, there will be a 1-week period where the model is available for "on-site generation only." After that, it will become available for everyone to download.
Alternatively, you can make a direct Bitcoin (BTC) donation, just make sure to DM me after that: 1CoMZvrXtRXbz7BCzdvxifSjHqhaf1yUZs
LUSTIFY
Lustify is a photoreal checkpoint optimized for creating high-quality imagery of women in explicit/sexual scenarios. The model has been trained on a hybrid dataset, meaning it natively understands both Danbooru tags and natural language prompting.
Note: While it has a strong NSFW bias, if you guide it properly, it is fully capable of generating stunning SFW photography, objects, animals, and fantasy environments.
Crucial Points Before You Download:
NOT Pony or Illustrious-Based: This is a standard SDXL checkpoint. Do not use Pony/Illustrious LoRAs with it; they will not work correctly.
Distant Shots & Anatomy Limitations: Like 99% of SDXL models, distant shots can sometimes suffer from distorted faces or hands. This is an inherent limitation of the base technology (4 channel VAE), not the finetune. It is incredibly easy to fix using Inpainting or ADetailer. Please utilize these tools rather than reporting this as a bug.
Experimental Nature: My training workflow involves a lot of unconventional, high-risk experimentation. Because of this, some prompt combinations that worked perfectly on other checkpoints might behave differently here. If you encounter unexpected behavior, feel free to give feedback so I can look into it.
Recomended parameters:
Sampler: DPM++ 2M SDE/DPM++ 3M SDE,
Scheduler: Exponential/Karras
Steps: 30
Cfg: 2.5-4.5.
Highres.fix: upscale by 1.4-1.5, denoising ~0.4
For the distant shots of people you probably wanna use highres.fix and/or adetailer.
Also, use reasonable positive/negative prompts, shizoprompting does more harm than good (with any SDXL model).
Some tags that have a big visual impact with this model:
Camera type tags: "shot on Polaroid SX-70", "shot on Kodak Funsaver", "shot on GoPro Hero", "shot on Canon EOS 5D", "shot on Leica T".
Photography styles: "analog photo", "glamour photography", "street fashion photography", "candid photo", "amateur photo".
Lighting types: "cinematic lighting", "neon lighting", "soft lighting", "dramatic lighting", "low key lighting", "bright flash photography", "warm golden hour lighting", "radiant god rays".
Film types: "Ilford HP5 Plus", "Lomochrome color film", "Fujicolor Pro".
Photographers: Alessio Albi, Martin Schoeller, Miles Aldridge, Oleg Oprisco, Tim Walker.
Others: "film grain", "bokeh", "dreamy haze", "technicolor", "underexposed", "low quality", "lowres"
Alternatively, you can give a read to this wonderful prompting guide by PromptGeek. It has A LOT of useful tips I didn't know about even after years of using SD.
Description
FAQ
Comments (179)
Thanks for your awesome work mate! I am trying to train a lora for it on kohya_ss but I think I'm using the wrong configuration, the results are awful. Do you happen to have a nice config I can use?
Same with OneTrainer. My perfect settings for endgame do not work well for olt. Backgrounds get ruined.
this is the model i used to make $70k. dm me if u want to partner up (no money, not selling anything) just sharing ideas
That's a shit ton of money.
I don't mean to sound like a beggar, but it would be nice if you could make a small donation to say āthank youā and help me cover the costs that went into making this model. Just saying. You don't have to, but it would only be fair if you did.
@coyotteĀ you should get half of the earning
@siddoney01Ā half is too much. Even $10 is more than okay. But the thing is, people prefer to donate to the big developers (who probably have their own enterprise-class GPUs at this point) rather than those who really need it. Or they don't even donate at all, cause in their minds they don't owe anything to anyone... And they don't, but still I won't ever understand them.
Eh, that's the way the world works. Can't do much about it.
Dude how are you making this happen? Im guessing ai OF/Insta? something of that sort? Would appreciate you sharing
@coyotteĀ As soon as I start making money with AI, I will be happy to donate money to the creators of the models. It is only fair to compensate their work.
Is it OFM? Send me your telegram
why is this entire comment thread taking this seriously and not recognizing it as the scam phishing attempt it obviously is? lmao. or are you guys just being ironic?
@shapeshifter83Ā I entirely suspect it is, but I've also seen people literally pull of numbers as big or bigger than what he's stating. Any insight is awesome. I also know that the minute he sends some link or asks for money, that's where I jump ship.
@HiragiMoonĀ yes G. I started on october 21 2024 with instagram and threads
@coyotteĀ where can I donate G
@aileverager555Ā there are two options, both can be found in the beginning of the description of the model
@coyotteĀ there you go. thanks for the work you have done bro. Hope to see more of your work cause i need this
@aileverager555Ā thanks a lot for the support, i REALLY appreciate that!
@shapeshifter83 this guy's legit
I have been using DMD2 for a while now and I am noticing that whatever the scene or the theme is, lets say the theme is swimming pool and the body of the model is wet just like it should be but the face becomes matt and has no water droplets or syncronization with the theme, Is this something U have also experienced and how to make it better and get the same environment or theme affects on the face of the model as well
As if the model is not applying the prompt instructions to the face
Even though if I try to inpaint the face it does make it match with the image theme but if I am generating 1000 images and if I select 50 images out of the 1000 it means I will have to inpaint each face separately which is a pain in the ass
Thanks in advance
Same shit with pants. Gorgeous shiny skintight leggings will be matte and loose.
how do i get this to work? I followed all instructions and Im not sure what I missed. I load it into A1111 and the inpainting is so bad
dunno if you still struggle with this but I always have to load an existing pic in PNG info, send it to inpaint and then subsequent generated inpaints work well. might help?
Anyone else having problems with uneven breasts?
rn Iām on the latest version of Fooocus and LUSTIFY!EndGame. Photo qualityās hella realistic, but faces always turn out glitchy. Any idea why? I did use the checkpointās recommended settings.
for example,
prompt : candid photo, 1girl, young, brunette, naked, cameltoe, r/godpussy, big boobs, looking at viewer, hand on ass, lying down on bed, thighhighs
negativ: text, watermark, shadowless, even lighting, ugly, fat, muscular, ribcage, pubic hair, (tanlines:1.3)
@BwenoĀ try comfyui
Sometimes it helps me to add some additional details on the face to improve the output.
Try adding something like, green eyes, eyeliner, freckles, parted lips, pretty face and other facial features.
try disabling the built-in Fooocus enhancers. One of them causes issues with some models.
Will this work on ios im a bit new to this stuff
Still waiting for the workflow for inpaint š„ŗ
the best porn model to date, wait for Fluxie-puxie :)
Extremely realistic and easy to get the right images, Wonder if this can be merged with HiDream
SDXL checkpoints like Lustify are incompatible with HiDream. Totally different tech. HiDream is based on Flux Schnell.
To use character loras with this model do you have to train the lora on this model or are there certain settings i can use so the faces dont come out all glitched
You're better of training a lora on this model specifically, because there was so much training done that the weights don't work 100% like vanilla SDXL. Same problem as with pony, basically, just not THAT prominent
if you have the faces already, you can try ipadapter faceid
had to read the title twice, was sure it said fixed denturesššš
thanks for the hard work š
I didn't know this checkpoint could create INSANELY OUTSTANDING landscape images as well. I'm happy I tested some landscape prompts.
Thanks! It's actually so much more than just a NSFW checkpoint. It just has a strong bias for it
@coyotteĀ That's what I noticed yesterday, and I couldn't stop myself from generating images since I found how realistic this is. Thank you for keeping this on-site. You have made a BEAST.
@6vidit9Ā thank you!
why do i get bad quality, reddish color when i inpaint? im using Inpainting model
Please provide your parameters (resolution, sampler, amount of steps, UI)
@coyotteĀ using forge: lustify_OLTINPAINT, pic size: 1072x1880, DPM++2MSDE karras, 26 steps, cfg 4. This happens sometimes tho
Love this Endgame OLT model...
so far this model has won my " easiest to do nsfw while keeping realism aspect." award. Works with ipadapter, and work with multiple sampler/scheduler as well. with so much to pick and experiment on, its never boring
Dear @coyotte i really love your latest v6 model
But i really wish you could make a version that works with loras as well. There is nothing better on civitai to create realistic nsfw images . Just wish loras could work also . Hope you are doing well
Thank you!
I'm sorry, but it's impossible to make it work with SDXL lors 100% the way they should work, for the same reasons they don't work with Pony/Illustrious. A lot of training has been done, and thanks to it, the model works the way it does.
@coyotteĀ okay i understand
Thatswhy Pony finetunes are superior to XL. I get perfect likeness with XL based celeb loras.
Im wondering, what you could do with this dataset on Pony.
@andrewfredrick800Ā you're getting "perfect likeness with XL based celeb loras" because most of these "pony finetunes" are not "finetunes" in fact, but just merges of pony v6 + regular SDXL models, or even merges of these merges. That's the only reason they work.
The longer you finetune a checkpoint (training process), the more it's weights shift from the vanilla, and so the tools made for vanilla stop working
@coyotteĀ I use Cyberrealistic, which is definitely a finetune. Why? Because everything works, what pony knows, plus you can use goodies from XL. Its not just a merge, where you achive realism with pony, but doesnt know shit about booru tags.
There are those merges of course, but there are good ones.
And of course those celeb loras needs plus prompting to get likeness, not like 1.5, where you just applied and worked.
@andrewfredrick800Ā Cyberrelistic pony does have other models merged in tho. Cyberdelia DID acknowledge that when I've asked them about it a year ago. You can find it in the "discussion" section of their model's page if you look back.
@coyotteĀ Of course there are XL in it. But its not a merge in a classic way, otherwise couldnt work as pony model with perfect booru adherence.
Perfect example is Biglove pony version. It is a merge with all the downside and upside, but not perfect at all(pony adherence is trash, its realistic, but at what cost)
@timthomas131 you'll probably like what I'm cooking right now then
@timthomas131Ā it's here
https://civitai.com/models/428826/damn-ponyillustrious-realistic-model
all SDXL inpainting change or replaces objects - things , nothing keep real in their original places , with respect of physics as different cloth or move is still fake and not real also.
I though I had a stroke while reading this. Sorry, but this text is really hard to understand
Check out my NEW Illustrious-based realistic checkpoint
https://civitai.com/models/428826/damn-ponyillustrious-realistic-model
is there anyway to remove back rolls? seems it's baked into the checkpoint, if you gen a photo where she's looking over the shoulder (back and booty to viewer), a lot of times the back rolls are very prominent.
"fat, obese" into the negatives
Dude, your checkpoint is great, a have very good results with it, keep working on it!
good
One of the very best bang for your buck, or in Civitai's case bang for your buzz checkpoints on here. Thanks for all the effort you continue to put into this.
Hey coyotte you know any fix for the missing imagtomultiplyof node? I tried everything. It got a conflict with post processing nodes. Tried switching nodes and everything. Any help would be greatly appreciated
You can try using alternatives to that node - ask chatgpt with web search option on or you can manually write a math function with math nodes (can't help with that, sadly, but chatgpt probably can).
Just a quick note: while I really enjoy this model, the FAQās āit can do men, check your promptā isnāt entirely accurate. Certain framing, like āa man from the viewer's perspective kneeling below themā or āa nude man from behind,ā consistently produces garbled or feminized anatomy. The model leans heavily toward female data (to no one's surprise, I'm sure), and even strong male LoRAs Iāve trained on it canāt fully correct that. A male likeness will be turned into a woman. So itās not just a prompt issue, itās structural. Still, I appreciate all the work thatās gone into it!
Model is only generating weird collages? anyone had this issue.
If I'm assuming the type of artifact you're describing correctly, lower you resolution and then upscale or apply hires fix.
IT'S GONE FROM THE GENERATOR :(
Lustify Endgame was truly an historic peak in SDXL development and one of the most well trained checkpoints there are. I hope Coyotte gets rid of all the synthetic data, and decides to continue his legacy from Endgame. We need another Lustify to move things forward in the sdxl territory.
Chinese are the only one, who can make another base model without synthetic data, but they are anime lovers, like the rest of the world. There wont be new Bigasp type model.
I would gather 5m data, but only insta, twitch, e-girls and onlyfan girls(for porn). No need for another cheap slutfaced models with porn actresses.
yeah more good quality pics wish i could train. just insert reddit girls, onlyfans, and other good content
I've spent the last 37 days at hospital. Now that I'm back, I might conside it. If I manage to rule out all the problems (financial/housing problems) I'm facing in life right now, that is.
Thanks for the kind words, really appreciate this
@coyotteĀ mate i hope you're well now. Think first in your health. Nothing is more important. Sorry i didn't know anything about this. I wish you the best of luck in your financial plans and i hope your health is getting better. Take as much time as you need, please. And thanks for your contribution to the community. Current day sdxl checkpoints owe a lot to Lustify.
@coyotteĀ wish you well , and be strong, wish we could help eachother on here. Would be dope as fuck if you could create some HD quality content only, with reddit onlyfans , sites like fapello , Twitter X , I dont mind sending some money. But your health is important first things first get better and lets support @coyotte , everyone gots to make a living , šø
this model doesn'y work anymore, anyone knows why?
Bid10k buzz, if you want to use it.
Better option: use it locally.
Is there a keyword for shaved/waxed? Can't find it
Hey, first of all, thanks for this model; it's really great. I just have one problem: the model is always posing sideways or with her back turned, looking over her shoulder. I know this can be fixed with PyraCanny, but I'd like to know if there's a keyword for the prompt that fixes this so I don't have to rely on reference images. I've tried different keywords and poses, but without any success. Thanks in advance!
This happens when you use words like "back", "behind", "ass", "butt", sometimes "ponytail" in a prompt, in general anything that can imply a view from behind, try to avoid it or use ārear viewā, "view from behind" in negative or something like that. the model can take literally what you use in a prompt. Also try pointing to a specific view - "front view", "facing to viewer" and increase their weighting
Wtf, OP just removes models cuz he thinks it's bad? I have the V3 model and it's perfectly fine.
But since the v3 is unpublished, does that mean model-merging and sharing is free? Afaik, v3 is no longer bound to the restrictions.
What restrictions? is v3 good?
@fromshahnahnahb957Ā Well, from this series I only have v3 and Endgame (v5) and comparing those two I like the v3 better.
It has deeper shadows, hair is much more detailed, height understanding is better, and it leans much more into nsfw than v5. I barely have to write anything and it wants to go into nsfw, which is good considering the model's name "lust", I would assume nsfw is the main focus and that's what v3 gives.
It's not perfect, but no model is, but it's certainly better than v5, imho.
Any chance you ccan build a V7 with a fair take on oral sex? I'm sitting here trying to build an image receiving oral from a guy, every single one comes back with her giving him oral. I've seen it have a guy do oral on a woman, but only in group sex. can't get a one on one
If I get to making a new version, I will try to
@coyotteĀ do you have a tagging index or anything for Lustify? It's real easy to use when just being gratuitous but when your looking for specific acts, I can't get them called up, I know the checkpoint do them, it's generated them on it's own for whatever reason, but when I specifically call the act out, it avoids it like the plague
@DouglajlĀ I was planning to make one for V7, yes!
Btw: thanks a lot for the donation, it'll go a long way
@coyotteĀ no worries, running across your checkpoint has enabled me to move forward with multiple erotica projects, stories written but no quality way to establish visuals. now i just need to know how to talk to it to trigger the scenes I want.
Is there any model that is just as good or better than Lustify for realism? Sad to see this isn't being updated
I absolutely love the quality of this checkpoint, especially with Adahm's workflow. But how the heck can I fight the NSFW bias? I put NSFW in the negatives and am describing what I want in great detail (Body covered up with a bath towel) And the only thing covered up is her hair... any tips for SFW generation? Or are there any SFW checkpoints with the same quality.
Well the thing's that it's a NSFW-oriented checkpoint at it's design, around 70% of the dataset are erotica/porn/etc. I'm working on a new version, which might be easier in that aspect, in the new data there's way more SFW, but can't really promise anything
Coyotte i'm your biggest fan!
I read in the news you're working on a new Lustify. Big if true!
Thanks a lot, appreciate this! Yeah, I am. Can't give an ETA, but I'll release it soon
I've read somewhere that you wanted to add more SFW data to Lustify. And i think you couldn't be more right! Lustify has the potential to expand its limits to a whole new league. The smarter the mode, the better. In all directions. Training data, like LLM's, should be diverse in knowledge. Checkpoints can do SFW and NSFW at the same time with no hassle. It already has been proven. SDXL is a very underrated model, if you ask me, and still to this day we haven't reached the limits of it. Anyways, thanks for your patience and welcome back.
I'm just a fan, Alan.
...your biggest fan.
I can t use this model on fooocus can you said me why ?
having trouble getting the subject to lay on their back, like for on a beach. i say laying on back in the prompt and they lay on their stomach.
the subject seems to always have their back to the camera even when specified not to
Does the OLT (FIXED TEXTURES) also work with inpainting?
There's a dedicated inpainting version of OLT in the "versions" panel. But yeah, non-inpainting version can also be used, especially in combination with Focus's modules via ComfyUI
super modƩle , merci :)
This model is still the GOAT . Just "discovered" the model behaves extremely well , maybe even better when creating at higher resolutions like 1600x1600
With control techniques like img2img or controlnets it creates high quality highres pics at 3200*3200.
Beautiful skin , realistic faces , realistic environment . Amazing
i'm trying to train a charater on it but still stay unconsistent, any advice???
I second this. I am using khoyass and would love some parameters advice. Or is it maybe better to train on another base model and not directly on this? Because the face does change a lot for me and I had no problem with training character lora on/for other model.
Also: love this model. <3 My fav
I'll be honest - this model is broken due to a lot of my weird decisions. Even I have problems training it right now. There's no easy fix for this, unfortunately, only tinkering with training settings until something just works
Make the character images more similar. Use the same character description each time for prompting. Train enough steps.
Lustify is by far the best and most frequently used SDXL-based model Iāve worked with for erotic and pornographic image generation. The body proportions are very balanced, skin texture is soft and realistic, and the detailsāespecially of the pussy, anus, and penisāare impressively sharp and accurate. The model performs extremely well in penetration scenes.
When combined with cinematic lighting prompts, the results are truly stunning. While many SDXL models tend to produce faces that look plastic or unnatural, Lustify stands out by generating faces that look much more natural, realistic, and aesthetically pleasing. Itās consistently reliable in both solo and penetration scenes, and often works great without the need for complex negative prompts.
Artifacts in hands and fingers are rare, which is a huge plus. If you're serious about creating erotic or pornographic content, this model is absolutely worth trying.
Most of the content on my profile was created with Lustify, so feel free to check it out.
Special thanks to Coyotte for bringing this incredible model to life.
hello, do you know how can I get sfw images with lustify? most of the time i get nsfw images but the quality is so good that I would want to create sfw images as well
palexandru595499Ā Don't prompt pussy, breasts, ass. Prompt clothes with a lot of details.
Thank you for the detailed review! Appreciate the kind words
Nine months later and Lustify Endgame is still better than most -current day- nsfw checkpoints which is absolutely insane in the AI space. I don't even know how Coyotte did this. I didn't like OLT version though. I hope the new Lustify is the rightful succesor to Lustify Endgame.
v4 still the best
you'll like v7 then
I thought it was just a minor version upgrade, but OLT is much clearer than END GAME and draws the specified images without any problems. END GAME was also a very high-level model, so this leap forward is truly remarkable.
In particular, the quality of ābackgrounds and landscapes,ā which other models often struggle with, is very high. Even when specifying limited scenarios like seas, jungles, valleys, or flower fields, it renders every detail meticulously and realistically. It maintains realism even when composing the scene using the control grid.
Among other XL models, there are no others that can flexibly render various locations with such clarity and realism. Especially when using the control grid, many models lose their realism.
OLT is undoubtedly one of the best real models in the XL series.
I want to use your model to train lora, what kind of settings do I need. Thanks
The same settings you would use for any other checkpoint. The default lora settings in OneTrainer are great. Instant success. Heard from someone that he needed 80h of training to find the best settings with KohyaSS.
@morszhang @subtleshader i have decent success with prodigy optimizer + cosine with restarts scheduler (1 restart per 2 epochs). Let prodigy figure out the LR
SubtleShaderĀ Is there any good preset or guide out there? My first LoRA (40 images) took about 3ā4 hours, but the result looked like an 80-year-old woman whose mouth and nose had been stretched out, lol.
I found a random preset, and this time with around 25 images it took almost 10 hours! The result is closer to the source image, but itās still not perfect, and Iām struggling to find the right sampler and CFG.
Thatās why Iām starting to think I messed up the training again, especially since it also took so long.
Iād really appreciate it if you could share a proper guide on how to make this work.
AirennĀ These training times are too long. Should take max 1h even with a slow gpu. You likely burned the lora. Just use OneTrainer with the default lora preset and everything will be fine.
SubtleShaderĀ exactly! My first training was around 10 minutes with 20 images. The second one with 40 images took about 4 hours. But 10 hours for 40? Dude, thatās way too much!
(Iām not even gonna mention that I have a 3080 with 16GB VRAMā¦)
I tried that, but at some point the sampler just turned black or became noisy.
What could be causing this? Iām using OneTrainer with Stability Matrix. Should I reinstall it? Or maybe my epoch/batch settings were bad? How many should I use for 20 or 40 images? Something is definitely wrong here.. .
edit: Does it matter if itās a face or something else? Like, do faces need more steps or epochs?
AirennĀ Just use the SDXL lora preset of OneTrainer without changing anything.
Hello, I want to train a character LoRA, and Iām not sure which version of Lustify to use. I was going to try BigLust, but I saw your models and they look really good. Since you mentioned some problems with your models, Iām not sure which one to pick now.
Iām thinking about using Endgame because it can do some SFW images. But the OLT version also looks fun those monster images are pretty cool, xd.
Also, Iād really appreciate any tips for training. Iāve done it before. my first LoRA at 512x turned out well. But when I tried training another at 1024x using OneTrainer, the results were really messed up and deformed.
Thanks in advance.
Some blocks of the model got corrupted somewhere in the creation process (not sure yet which version started that). It's OK for inferencing, but breaks the training. I'll try to fix that in the new version.
For now, you can train the LoRA on your preferred version, then manually disable/lower the weight of one block at a time (with Lora Block Weighted extension/node or with kohya), until you have a good result. Then just use your lora without that single block or two.
Regarding the settings - as I've said in the other comment, Prodigy optimizer + cosine with restarts scheduler, 1 restart per 2 epochs. 1024x1024 resolution. Prodigy will figure out LR automatically
coyotteĀ Is disabling or blocking the LoRA something youāre supposed to do during training, or only when generating? Since it took me almost a whole day to set up the settings and get OneTrainer working. Iām still pretty new to all this I had to run the training a bunch of times just to make it work. And even now, Iām not sure It will be a success. lol
Also, one more thing: is your model using natural language or tagged prompts? I picked natural, but now Iām wondering if I shouldāve gone with tagged. I hope that doesnāt mess anything up.
Sorry if I'm asking too much, Iāve looked at a bunch of guides, but there are so many that Iām just kinda lost. Thanks again.
Airenn it'sĀ better to disable specific blocks on lora when generating. That way you'll have more contol.
Use any prompt style you want, it's trained with both natural language and tagged prompts. IMO it's best to use mix of both
The new one will understand tags? Emotions too?
I don't understand what you're asking. It already can be used with tags and it can portray emotions when prompted.
coyotteĀ No, it cant. At least subtle ones. Emotions, what works on booru based models are simple no effect. My naughty girl looked like a fish in a bag with open mouth and scared eyes with Lustify.
harleyshrey712Ā except it can?
https://files.catbox.moe/sbwek1.png
https://files.catbox.moe/ycvcq8.png
https://files.catbox.moe/zk4z5d.png
https://files.catbox.moe/c8bgqt.png
https://files.catbox.moe/ocolsd.png
https://files.catbox.moe/m53mbt.png
just a couple of low effort quick tests
"a fish in a bag with open mouth and scared eyes with Lustify" yeah that's on you, not on the model
coyotteĀ Sorry, they are shit:)
harleyshrey712Ā gotcha, i know it, just like i said "quick low effort tests".
You're the one who couldn't get even there with that "fish" girl tho, so whatever
coyotteĀ :) Its not low effort. Thats the max, what an XL model knows. XL makers should train more on proper emotions. Actually they should tag booru emotions.
coyotteĀ Images from new Lustify?
SubtleShaderĀ yes, but it's still baking, because I'm not quite happy with it's current state
coyotteĀ Same here. Looking forward to your new version.
SubtleShaderĀ same to you!
How to fix six fingers after 1.5x upscale?
CFG: 7
denoising: 0.7
Why exactly are you using denoising value of 0.7? That's too high. What upscaling method is that? CFG is too high for the model as well.
Read the description, copy the recommended parameters for both generation and upscaling, then please write back if you have any more problems.
coyotte I am usingĀ 4x_NMKD-Superscale-SP
FinnHumanĀ in that case you really shouldn't have your denoising that high.
My character loras trained on sdxl base model do not seem to translate on your finetune.
They don't. You wouldn't use these loras on pony/illustrious, the same applies here.
coyotteĀ what do you mean? I thought this model was finetuned off of SDXL base?
TheNecr0mancerĀ pony/Illustrious are also finetuned from base SDXL.
A LOT of training has been done, the weights have shifted too much to be compatible with vanilla SDXL loras for 100%.
coyotteĀ alright thanks, one last question. Does your model favor clip skip 1 or 2? And does it like training above 1024 resolution?
TheNecr0mancerĀ the default clip skip for SDXL is always 2, I didn't try change that
Dear @coyotte first of all thank you for baking a new version. I just wonder can you reveal something more about the new version what we can expect, like is it hyper realistic, is it better than v6, uhm š¤ is it trained with HD images what kind of style , hehe sorry if I ask to much, I'm checking everyday to see if it's dropped 𫳠and I hope you are doing better much š
Hey, thank you!
I'm trying to make it all-in-one: amateur style, HD style, hyperrealistic illustration style. That would be a good finisher version for this architecture. Right now it's like 60% where I want it to be (but I have really high standards, so that info isn't useful probably). Not sure I will keep trying to push it to the 100% - I'm both getting tired of this and the money for training is running out.
coyotteĀ that is great info, I understand its hard work, and its about money also, I will donate some money to your bitcoin , cause I want to support your work, I wish more people would do it, cause you bring the best on here to generate nsfw š, thanks for your reply, please dont give up š stay safe and much ā¤ļø
sonic4life170Ā thank you! I would really appreciate that
coyotteĀ no problem we all need to help eachother, I send you some in a few
@sonic4life170Ā that's a good mindset. I will mention you in the "contributors" list in the description if you do decide to do that āš»
@coyotteĀ I send it with boosty , and pay with cc , hold on
heya, i've been a fan of your work for a long time now, but I was wondering if there is any hope of your models being officially hosted on TensorArt?
Yeah, I was planning to do so for a long time already. Just never got it xD I'll try to
Hi there! First off, thanks for your amazing work ā Iāve been using your V5 (EndGame DMD2) a lot. One issue I keep running into though is that even when I try to generate SFW images, it often outputs NSFW results. Iāve already included things like (NSFW, tits, nipples, nude, naked, pussy) in the negative prompt, but it still happens quite a bit. Do you have any tips or suggestions for how to better avoid this?
Negative prompts do not work with DMD2 because DMD2 requires CFG=1, meaning zero attention to negatives. The highest you can push cfg with it is 1.2, more than that and the image gets deepfried. Questionable trade-off for barely more attention to negatives.
You should use NAG (Normalized Attention Guidance) node to make the negatives work with cfg=1. It's the recent wonder.
Alright, Iāll go try it out. Thanks for the heads-up:)
I have been trying to create a LORA for models such as ālustify endgameā and ālustify OLTā for some time now. But I am not getting very good results. I have tried several recommended parameters and only came close to a result with good fidelity and generalization with something around +10k steps.
Why do many tutorials say that 3k is enough? What am I doing wrong?
(training in khoyass with a 3060 12gb)
(datasets containing around 80/150 images)
Epochs: 130
Batch Size: 2
Learning Rate: 2e-05 (Adafactor optimizer)
LR Scheduler: Cosine
Resolution: 1024x1024
LoRA Rank (Network Dim): 128
LoRA Alpha: 64
Dropout: Rank (0.05), Module (0.05)
Noise Offset: 0.02
XFormers: Enabled
2e-05 with "cosine" scheduler might a reason. I recommend "cosine with restarts" and Prodigy optimizer. 1 restart per 2 epochs. Prodigy will set LR automatically.
Also, the model is overtrained to hell just to be good at NSFW, hence the higher amount of steps needed for LoRA training
coyotteĀ Thank you, I will try it!
try using uni_pc simple with this model and you will be pleasantly surprised by the result :)
It follows the prompt less, but more creative?
I can't say exactly what's going on, but the result seems interesting to me.
wen chroma tun??
Loras - I might make some soon, after I'm finished with the last (for real this time) Lustify version.
Proper finetune - if/when some company gives me GPU hours on enterprise level GPUs (H100 or something, this architecture is painfully hard to finetune), which means probably never š
coyotteĀ is thr lustify based of of bigasp 2.5
Kitten123Ā by now it is 80% it's own thing. And the new version I'm training right now has even less of other models weights in it (basically i'm redoing it from scratch). Read the end of the description for full details.
No, bigASP 2.5 is not present in this model.
@coyotteĀ You're working on another Lustify version? Damn, you're the best!
is the lustify you are currently working on are using bigasp 2.5
No, not at all. In fact it's a big rework that aims to lower the presence of other checkpoints in it's weights, while preserving most of the current strengths and some more.
These foreheads could kill. It looks like, they are bolding too.
cool
Excellent SDXL model. Thank you.
Dear author. Do you have plans to make an FP32 model?
This checkpoint don t work on fooocus .. can you help me ?
simple to use, easy to master, except for hands lol