all the bdsqlsz stuff is new I guess

afaik they should be usable with every standard load controlnet model node there is? do you have any specific issues with getting them to work?

@eurotaku Some (and very significant for me) difficulties lie in adapting existing workwlows to the updated nodes of the controlnet-lllite; simply replacing one node will not work; i need to significantly rework the logic of worflows or (but most likely this is exactly what) create a work process from scratch. My skills won't allow me to do this in an acceptable amount of time, so I'm wondering if more experienced users have already done this

tried using this workflow:

https://github.com/kohya-ss/ControlNet-LLLite-ComfyUI

to get images like these:

https://huggingface.co/bdsqlsz/qinglong_controlnet-lllite

and nothing worked for me (the result with the node turned on and the node bypass was the same), it seems that the node "Load LLLite" has no effect... maybe I'm doing something wrong?

I realized what the problem was when using the test workspace - I incorrectly specified the value of the "end_percent" value. In most cases that I dealt with, this value was specified in the range from 0 to 1, but in the Load LLLite node this value should be specified in the range from 0 to 100, you need to get used to it. After I realized this and specified the correct value, everything worked as it should.

And yet, returning to my original question - there is a problem with integrating this node into existing workflows, and this is where I have big problems. In particular, I was unable to embed the node under discussion in my favorite and very convenient Winstons workflow https://civitai.com/models/138397

@modzhahead158 yeah, the end_percent thing is weird. but good to know, you won't be the only one getting confused by that :D

@eurotaku So, experimentally I found that the “Load LLLite” node conflicts with the “KSampler Inspire” node, which is used in the Winstons workflow, that I so dearly love. At this point my skills said astalavista, and I plunged into existential sadness. That's all for now )))

like this: https://i.imgur.com/VHoHiXx.png

@modzhahead158 is it not possible to disable the conflicting nodes (temporarily) if they are not in same workspace ?

@simartem07 You can disable nodes in the manager, is this what you need? as example: https://i.imgur.com/aM9N7Lk.png

@modzhahead158 thanks for the response but actually my reply was for your suffering in previous comments that you told some nodes are conflicting.. thats why i suggested you, not actually for me :)

@simartem07 sorry, I misunderstood you :) at that point the problem was already solved, but I will take your advice into consideration for the future

absolutely no need to be sorry :)
i must admit that i am not entirely sure, if the fp16/32 thing even applies to those controlnet lllite (short for like lora lite) models. as far as i understood the approach they can be trained with different rank settings just like loras, stability.ai even provided two different rank versions of their models. but if someone here knows more about that, feel free to correct me :D

@eurotaku The error I got was "upsample_nearest2d_channels_last" not implemented for 'Half'" But this error does not appear when using my model of choice alone while using a half-precision instance of A1111. It only occurs when I try to apply the ControlNets while using half precision. I admit all of this is a bit above my pay grade.

@epzer hard to troubleshoot here, we provide help on our discord, though :)

Try blur instead.

@mweldonsd594 I did, not the same results at all.

only tile for anime still...

is there some specific error you're getting? you can join us on our discord for support, btw :)

maybe it's for ComfUI only?

@slartibart353 all these controlnets should work with any ui that supports controlnets for sdxl

@eurotaku Hi :-) as a newcomer - can u recommend an FAQ using the different preprocessors? for the ip-adapter i have three installed (ip-adapter_clip_sd15, ip-adapter_clip_sdxl, ip-adapter_clip_sdxl_plus_vith) - but when to use which? ;-) And maybe there are another out there doing a better work? :)

@slartibart353 you can start with controlnets in general using this guide https://stable-diffusion-art.com/controlnet/
to the second part: the first one is used with checkpoints based on sd1.5, the other two with sdxl ones. the plus indicates an enhanced variant, the exact differences are unknown to me, though. there are also face variants of those models, they essentially work the same but only use the face area of the provided image

sadly not really, need to test them yourself and see what works for you