Goddess Project
--Formerly Uncensored Females--
Standalone Checkpoint - Goddess works in FORGE only
DO NOT LOAD a separate VAE, TE, or CLIP unless using GGUF
This version is a mixed precision Flux Dev model, with limited UNET changes to allow for feminine anatomy.
Run this model in automatic FP16 Lora mode NOT NF4
This model is full precision in BF16 UNET with mixed precision (NF4) on the TE blocks
This model fits in a 24GB card and could be run in GPU only mode as such
High speed BF16 with a slightly lower prompt accuracy compared to the 33GB full model
Links (For GGUF ONLY)
Updated CLIP - Standard CLIP-L - FP8 CLIP-L -- ** Version Comparison **
Per the Apache 2.0 license FLAN is attributed to Google
This model is a training using many individuals with known ages and 2257 forms, it has also been merged to try and ensure that no known individuals can be reproduced. However FLUX seems to like to learn faces even with less then 10% data rather then merge them into a new face.
Description
FAQ
Comments (19)
Can you add the GGUF version too?
It's something I can look at doing
@Felldude I can't wait to see the results and other users with minimal hardware will be happy too.
@karldonitz28599 The four step FLUX is the next model up for release, it is the fastest for me on a 3050, I can run 3 images a minute. (Fastest by IT's per second and the 16 less steps), the quality is less then FP8 or Q8, Q4 but it is impressive for only 4 steps
@Felldude I am using RTX 3050 too, but for some reason, if I use Flux NF4 with minimum steps it still can't produce images in a short time and instead takes 11-17 minutes even with the same resolution if I use Flux GGUF Q4 K M. If I use Flux GGUF Q4 K M I can produce images in a short time even with a large number of steps
@karldonitz28599 For me comfy UI can do native 2048x2048 at FP8 and forge will crash, but Forge can handle NF4 much faster
@karldonitz28599 I still use comfy with FP8 as I found it to be faster the Q4_0 by far and have LORA support
I would LOVE for you to provide a Q6_K GGUF version. I find that version is the best trade-off of size vs quality.
@97Buckeye I thought only Q4 and Q8 worked with LORA's
@Felldude Not that I've found in all my workflows. I've been using the Q6_K version of Flux D for months with a variety of loras. 🤷🏼
It took a month but I added Q8, I do think it is superior to FP8, but NF4 is still my choice even if it does mean I have to use FORGE for LORA support
Yea I suspect Flux has some nefarious anti-NSFW in it. But if someone figures how to properly build LORA/checkpoint out of de-distilled Flux, we might get something good, eventually.
Pony wasnt build over day either.
I do think they used AI to impose images of textures, candies pillows or whatever random sized object that would censor the image. I also appears the T5xxl and CLIP-L had tokens sanitized.
I have no empirical evidence of this, and unless Blackforest releases more info, or they have a leak, I doubt we will get the data.
With the crazy laws that California is trying to pass I can understand not saying shit.
@Felldude I 100% believe they censored it that way. The random object obstructing the view happens way too often. They poisoned the data like SD3, but managed to do it in a different way that at least still makes a decent image instead of breaking the whole model like SD3.
Which laws? 3080, the real ID law failed, but a bunch of states have passed their own version.
At any rate it extends far beyond California and across both major parties. Most of the states that have passed real ID check laws are in fact red states, though the law was conceived by a liberal in Louisiana. The liberal governor of Kentucky (an otherwise super red state) vetoed one such law. Project 2025 outlines banning ALL porn on its 5th page...out of a 900+ page document. The fact that they bring it up so early should tell you just how much that group wants to do this. It is one of the first things they want to do when they get the chance.
Then you have the payment processors putting pressure on any website hosting NSFW. Gumroad recently banned all NSFW content from its site, and it called out PayPal and Stripe specifically as the reason why. PP and Stripe have threatened and killed numerous websites already. So even if no new laws pass, the payment companies are forcing their own twisted form of censorship over the whole world.
Again the point being this goes far beyond California. Things are looking very bad for us. It is only a matter of time before Civitai does something as well. Enjoy it while you can. Paddle prohibits NSFW content, and that is why we have Civitai Green now. And they still go through PP and the others. I am certain Paddle and/or PP are going to force Civitai to kill the the non Green part of the site in time. maybe a year or two.
@tbsmax They are approaching it from every angle, finical is one such as holding hosting companies liable for deepfakes, or other content. Auditing the dataset is another. I'm not sure how you would go about that as it would take a 1000 humans looking at 1000 images a day, 22,000 days to check the data that went into black forest dataset
@Felldude They will not use humans, not that much. They will use AI, which of course will create more problems, like how youtube uses AI to moderate badly.
That is what civitai will eventually do as well. Mod bots are already prevalent on many art sites. They still have some humans, but the bots do most of it...again, badly.
I do think a backlash will eventually come against the censorship, but it will take years. No politician wants to say they support porn. However, society acts like a pendulum, with the new generation often swinging against the previous. Starting a magazine like Playboy was unthinkable even in the era it began, it came out while I Love Lucy was still showing a husband and wife in separate beds.
You can go back to the 1920s, there was a sexual revolution after women got the right to vote. It was short lived as it swung back again in mid 30s.
I just hope it doesn't take 15 years to get back to "normal". Maybe technology will compress the cycle.
NSFW is in human nature. When whoever prompted mankind into existence did that, they used "and they will be forever horny" as part of it.
Nothing can beat human nature in this aspect, no matter how hard they try. Christianity tried that for past 2000 years and failed.
Besides, every time mankind tries to beat "nature" it only beats itself.
Bit more on topic, you can force FLUX to do what you want to some extent, but its not easy. It definitely has some anti-NSFW mechanics built in it, which are not that easy to fool (but possible).
Apart cleaned and purged FLUX, we probably need same for even basic CLIP L and T5. Which probably can be done, question is if someone will do it. But then for example furry community is pretty skilled and always more than eager to be the first to do something like that. I bet on them.
@Mescalamba Possibly T5xxl however the interaction with flux is quite odd, with the data parallelism/duel blocks. CLIP-L seems to make little difference
I'd rather have the same boobs under the same face than candy-shaped and/or lego-shaped nipples and no crotch.
Call me old-fashioned, but it's the way I roll.
Details
Files
Available On (1 platform)
Same model published on other platforms. May have additional downloads or version variants.