CivArchive
    Preview undefined

    Goddess Project

    --Formerly Uncensored Females--

    Standalone Checkpoint - Goddess works in FORGE only

    DO NOT LOAD a separate VAE, TE, or CLIP unless using GGUF

    This version is a mixed precision Flux Dev model, with limited UNET changes to allow for feminine anatomy.

    • Run this model in automatic FP16 Lora mode NOT NF4

    • This model is full precision in BF16 UNET with mixed precision (NF4) on the TE blocks

    • This model fits in a 24GB card and could be run in GPU only mode as such

    • High speed BF16 with a slightly lower prompt accuracy compared to the 33GB full model

    Per the Apache 2.0 license FLAN is attributed to Google


    This model is a training using many individuals with known ages and 2257 forms, it has also been merged to try and ensure that no known individuals can be reproduced. However FLUX seems to like to learn faces even with less then 10% data rather then merge them into a new face.

    Description

    FAQ

    Comments (10)

    shalolaNov 20, 2024
    CivitAI

    https://ibb.co/GV0QnM0

    hey sorry to bother you again. i just run the workflow u put out but this is the result that i got when i ran it..

    Felldude
    Author
    Nov 20, 2024

    If your not getting errors in python, I am not sure what to recommend other then update comfy

    shalolaNov 20, 2024

    @Felldude i dont get any error either when i ran it.. ill try my luck with other UI. your GGUF and NF4 models both works fine for me dont know why only this one decided not to :(

    sevenof9247Nov 23, 2024
    CivitAI

    Speed Test, ok its for your nvidia card

    you have tested GGUF? you will see its very slow ;)

    JohnRohanNov 29, 2024
    CivitAI

    For me works OK by itself, but with any Flux lora it makes blurry images.

    Felldude
    Author
    Nov 30, 2024· 1 reaction

    For lora support I tend to use NF4 (FP16) Lora in forge

    Kierkegaard420Dec 1, 2024

    @JohnRohan Have you tried reducing the weight of the Lora?

    JohnRohanDec 8, 2024

    @Kierkegaard420 yes and still blurry with any other loras I tried. Also using FP16 too.

    JohnRohanDec 10, 2024

    It's even blurry when I use a simple pubic hair lora!!!

    Felldude
    Author
    Dec 10, 2024

    @JohnRohan I have tested with lora's in auto FP16 LORA the only mode it should be used in, with normal/euler the majority of images where fine however as with most NF4 the checkpoint can just fail do to the insane quantization

    Checkpoint
    Other

    Details

    Downloads
    273
    Platform
    CivitAI
    Platform Status
    Available
    Created
    11/20/2024
    Updated
    5/11/2026
    Deleted
    -