Pro Version of Realism Pony V4-V5-V6 now Available on My Patreon
Onsite generations are permanently available on these models:
👉 Realism_By_Stable_Yogi V3: https://civarchive.com/models/166609?modelVersionId=992946
Realism by Stable Yogi Pony V6.5
V6.5 is here — and you all helped build it.
Real thank-you to everyone who pushed V6 hard, sent feedback, and posted the broken hands. V6.5's fix list literally came from you. Anatomy, hand grips, expressions, twin-tails, full-body proportions, isolated objects, painterly style separation, hair color consistency — all worked on this round.
Trigger Word
99rbsy99 — add this to every prompt for the V6.5 realism style. Place it at the END of your tag list for soft activation, or earlier for stronger effect.
Compatible with my character LoRAs (which use 99bsy99) — they stack cleanly without conflict. Use both together for a character rendered in V6.5 realism.
All Variants in This Release
Seven variants ship today, covering everything from 4 GB CPU setups to 24 GB workstations.
FP32 (safetensors, around 13 GB)
Maximum precision. Research and production work. Best for 24 GB+ cards.
FP16 (safetensors, around 6.5 GB)
The default. Best quality and speed balance for most users.
BF16 (safetensors, around 6.5 GB)
Same size as FP16, slightly faster on RTX 3000+ with native BF16 support.
FP8 Scaled (safetensors, around 3.2 GB)
Near-FP16 quality at half the VRAM. Native in Forge and ComfyUI. Great for 8 GB cards.
DMD2 Merge (safetensors, around 6.5 GB)
FP16 with DMD2 distillation LoRA pre-merged. 4-step generation. LCM sampler, CFG 1.2. Fastest path for any card.
Q8_0 GGUF (around 3.9 GB)
8-bit quantized. Near-FP16 quality. For 12+ GB cards in GGUF workflows.
Q4_0 GGUF (around 2.7 GB)
4-bit quantized. Smallest file. Makes SDXL actually run on 6–8 GB entry-level cards.
Quick Pick by Your VRAM
24 GB+ (3090, 4090, 5090, A6000) — FP16 or BF16. No reason to compress.
12–16 GB (3060 12GB, 4070, 4080) — FP8 Scaled or Q8_0 GGUF. Near-FP16 quality with headroom for LoRAs.
8–12 GB (3060, 4060 Ti, 2080) — FP8 Scaled or Q8_0 GGUF. Solid quality, comfortable VRAM use.
6–8 GB (3050, 2060, 1660) — Q4_0 GGUF. Smallest file, makes SDXL actually work on entry-level cards.
CPU only or 4 GB cards — Q4_0 GGUF in ComfyUI-GGUF. Slow but functional.
DMD2_Fp16 variant. 4 steps instead of 25–30.
Recommended Settings
For FP32, FP16, BF16, FP8 Scaled, and GGUF variants:
Sampler — DPM++ 2M Karras, Euler a, or Restart
Steps — 25 to 30
CFG — 4 to 7
Resolution — Native SDXL (1024×1024 or aspect-ratio buckets)
For DMD2 specifically:
Sampler — LCM
Steps — 4 (not 25+)
CFG — 1.2 (not 7)
Result — Comparable quality to a 25-step generation in roughly 1/6 the time
Quants Explained — Which File Do I Pick?
If you've ever seen FP16, BF16, FP8, Q4, Q8 and just downloaded the biggest one, this section is for you.
What's a quant
? Same model, smaller file. Weights are compressed so they fit on less VRAM. Some quality loss vs FP16, but smart compression (Q8_0) is so close you won't see a difference in normal use.
Quality Ladder
FP16 ≈ BF16 ≈ Q8_0 > FP8 > Q4_0. Above Q4_0 the differences are basically invisible in normal generation.
About Speed
Smaller quants are NOT always faster. Generation speed is mostly compute-bound on most cards — quants help with VRAM fit, not raw iterations per second. Where they DO help speed: avoiding system-RAM offload, which is what kills speed on small cards when the model doesn't fit.
Three Reasons to Use a Quant
VRAM fit. A 6 GB card cannot load a 6.5 GB FP16 SDXL — your UI will try to offload to system RAM and generation crawls to under 0.1 iterations per second. A Q4_0 fits with room to spare.
Speed via avoiding offload. Once a model fits in VRAM, speed depends on your card's compute, not file size. But the second it doesn't fit, speed drops 10 to 100 times. Quants are insurance against that cliff.
More room for LoRAs, ControlNet, hires fix. Even if FP16 technically fits, loading a couple of LoRAs and a ControlNet on top can push you over. Q8_0 leaves you 2–3 GB of headroom for the rest of your stack.
How to Load GGUF Files
GGUFs need a loader, since most UIs don't natively support them yet.
For ComfyUI — install the ComfyUI-GGUF custom node:
https://github.com/city96/ComfyUI-GGUF
For Forge or Forge Neo — install my Forge SDXL GGUF extension:
https://github.com/brandulateai/sd-forge-sdxl-gguf-brandulateai
After installing, GGUFs load straight from the standard checkpoint dropdown. No external module picker, no extra setup.
All my GGUFs are bundled (UNet + CLIP-L + CLIP-G + VAE in one file) so they load without picking separate components.
Pro Version Available
This is the standard version of V6.5. The Pro version is trained on more data for longer, producing a more polished and refined output. Available on My Patreon
Found Anything Off?
Drop it in the comments or on Discord. V7's fix list starts now.
Want to contribute to checkpoint feedback, signup here Studio.Brandulate
Join me on Patreon for exclusive perks and early access to unique resources.
To discuss custom LoRa's or models, feel free to connect on Discord.
👍 Like this model to keep me motivated and inspired to create more!
💬 Drop a comment and let me know what you'd love to see next.
🌟 Review this model to help me improve and make even better creations.
🔔 Hit that notification bell to stay updated with my latest models and updates!
Important Usage Tips
Add Stable_Yogis_PDXL_Positives at the beginning of your prompt section.
Add Stable_Yogis_PDXL_Negatives-neg at the beginning of your negative prompt section.
Description
Steps: 20+
Sampler: Euler a
CFG scale: 4+
Size: All SDXL Compatible Sizes
Negative Embedding: Stable_Yogis_PDXL_Negatives-neg
Positive Embedding: Stable_Yogis_PDXL_Positives
FAQ
Comments (28)
you sir are a genius, keep it up!
Thanks !
I loved this checkpoint before realizing you had custom embeddings; now, I want to marry it.
Generates great looking characters using CLIP Skip 2
Thanks for the feedback.
thanks for this one!
Thank you for the feedback. 👍
Just wow. Unbelievable good.
Thanks for the feedback. 😊
nice
I trained a personal lora character with Civitai's onsite trainer and the training preview images are incredibly good, but when i use the lora in Comfy, the results are deeply washed out. This is using the default workspace + lora loader and suggested settings. Generating without the lora produces awesome images.. so what is the mismatch between my lora and the model ? Is it a Comfy bug ?
You can use Realism_V3_VAE. Use Forge or A1111—Comfy is a mess as always. All my images are generated in bulk—1k, 2k, 5k—and all these are testing images created before launching any model. Later, I release all these images.
So, I never face any issues with any LoRA or training, etc. (😊 Work with a packed brain like A1111 or Forge, while Comfy feels like a brain explosion—wires hanging everywhere, spending a day fixing one workflow to just generate a few images. Such a waste of time.)
@Stable_Yogi I trained on Realism V3 Lightning, I guess this was a bad idea ? I will retrain my character on V3 VAE, but I need tips about the settings.. i usually leave all tags by default, then 20 epochs and unet rate 0.00100, clipskip2, and Prodigy, but these might be recommended for other models, what about this one ? which settings should be set on Civitai's onsite trainer, because theres a lot of room for error there... my dataset is 35 good quality pictures from a photoshoot.
@randomchatter1234776
Train with Realism V3 VAE
If a woman, then remove 1girl, 1woman, and add a unique name for her with numbers and symbols like 456freddy@76
unet rate default
clipskip1,
and Prodigy,
dataset with 35 good quality pictures is fine.
Set 5 repeats
20 epochs
i never trained on civit trainer so i am not sure if that like Kohya or a different UI.
try these and you will get closer.
@Stable_Yogi @Stable_Yogi just realised the lightning trained lora i did earlier needs to be run at 125 steps to get a decent image, it might be due to me applying wrong training settings. but i will retrain it on V3VAE instead, following your instructions. If this works out great you will be rewarded. t.y.
@Stable_Yogi I am getting incredibly good results following your training settings advice. My war against Flux is now over. I deleted everything Flux related and nearly every other XL checkpoints and loras i had because this replaces them all. The only thing missing is good "cum'', it looks rather blocky or grainy, any quality suggestion for that ?
@randomchatter1234776 I feel blessed i ended a war 😁
use weight in captions like (cum:1.3) Or use a lora.
If dosnt work let me know i will train a lora and share it with you.
I hope you stay peaceful now.😊
@Stable_Yogi Are you referring to this? SG161222/Realistic_Vision_V3.0_VAE
I'm not finding the Realism_V3_VAE on google.
@Kierkegaard420 Ref to this https://civitai.com/models/166609?modelVersionId=992946
@Stable_Yogi Thank you! :)
V5 XL seems quite good . improvements from V4 are very tangible and among those improvements the most I want to praise is a) better anatomy and prompt adherences(checkpoint listens to your prompt , trying not to leave anything behind , and does her best to do your bidding ) , b) lighting , sharp crisp focus , glossy texture , glittering effects , all work very well with deep contrast . I personally feel V5 is definitely superior to earlier versions !
Thanks for the detailed Feedback. I appreciate your input. Thanks
@Stable_Yogi your model can do or add what other can't . in that light , quite unique so I haven't yet get bored using it because it delivers something new everyday I have missed yesterday .
@ttssmm27806 Thank you for the love and experiments, you made my day !❤
Fantastic model. The bodies it produces, jhheeez, u haven't just sourced any old bodies, you found the best, great diversity in women, particularly with regard to traditionally underrepresented ethnicities, bold, striking images which purr with beauty when generated, I don't usually sit to watch wallpaper dry, or the kettle boil, but I will gladly sit 2.5 minutes staring at the progress bar in eager anticipation as I just know this model will craft an image of delight (or at least 80% of the time in a decent size batch lol). Great work Yogi - don't stop what you're doing. Namaste
Wow, thank you for such an amazing review! Glad you're enjoying the model—I'll keep striving to bring more magic. Namaste!
for sure, Indian women weren't so beautiful in any other model, but this one is AWESOME !
TOTALLY AGREE! Great Work!



















