Name inspired by the 2002 film "S1m0ne" about a non-existent digital actress. An amalgamation of created and found celebrity models merged, this S1m0ne likewise does not exist.
.5 -.7 weight is recommended, depending on the model and desired effect. You'll have more freedom prompting specific clothing on the lower end, and the upper end gets racier - this LORA doesn't take much encouraging to get horny. If you want to avoid that, lower weight and/or 'nude' with emphasis in the negative is advised.
Higher end also tends to add some ornate details to environments which can be interesting, and it bakes at the top so be aware.
_________________
Trained from 65 images generated from the previously stated merged celebrities model (1.5 base), which won't be shared because you have to call out EVERY celebrity token in a row to get S1m0ne, and it's an unwieldy mess. I like it being a 'secret sauce' anyways!
Any poor results with resemblance can most often be fixed with a higher resolution img2img or inpaint, like most LORA's, assuming you have a solid prompt.
Description
V.1, and likely the only. Haven't tried it with the keyword 'S1m0ne' although it was in the captioning, so I know it's not necessary!
FAQ
Comments (5)
Where to put this file?
Probably depends on your UI. In Automatic111 put it in your stable-diffusion-webui/models/lora folder, then when prompting use the format <lora:A:B>, A being the name of the LORA file you're using and B being the weight of the file.
I like your model as well, I see its a mix, but you use custom names making it difficult for me to duplicate. Would you be willing to share the details?
Ok, if I'm reading my janky naming convention correctly:
Realistic vision v1.1 sum .5 URPM v1 --->
add .2 F222 v.1 --->
sum .25 fredHerzogPhotography --->
sum .25 ClassicNegative v.1 --->
sum .2 Protogen 5.8
Something like that. I'm not sure if I should upload the model, it's my favorite but it's not drastically different from other merges and there are so damn many random merges everywhere...
@drone2222 Agreed! thx for the breakup of the formula, will try it! And keep up the good work!












