
Join The Tinkerer on Whop to get early releases, private pages, and the Tinkerer Discord role - all in one place. 👉 Join on Whop
CyberRealistic Classic is a more unrestricted version of CyberRealistic that offers the same freedom and flexibility. It serves as an experimental platform for testing new features and concepts that haven't been integrated into the original CyberRealistic. Essentially, it functions as a fully operational alternative edition of CyberRealistic.
Recommended Settings
Sampling method: DPM++ SDE Karras / DPM++ 2M Karras
VAE: is already Baked In
Sampling steps: 30 Steps
Resolution: 512x768
CFG: 5-7
Upscale: 2x
Upscaler: 4x_NickelbackFS_72000_G
Denoising strength: 0.3-0.35Example Negative prompts
watermark, text, censored, deformed, bad anatomy, disfigured, poorly drawn face, mutated, extra limb, ugly, poorly drawn hands, missing limb, floating limbs, disconnected limbs, disconnected head, malformed hands, long neck, mutated hands and fingers, bad hands, missing fingers, cropped, worst quality, low quality, mutation, poorly drawn, huge calf, fused hand, missing hand, disappearing arms, disappearing thigh, disappearing calf, disappearing legs, fused fingers, abnormal eye proportion, abnormal hands, abnormal legs, abnormal feet, abnormal fingersless tokens:
lowres, bad anatomy, bad hands, text, error, missing fingers, extra digit, fewer digits, cropped, worst quality, low quality, normal quality, jpeg artifacts, signature, watermark, username, blurry
Need the perfect prompt? This custom ChatGPT instantly generates high-quality prompts or helps you refine your own.
🔗 [Try it now on ChatGPT]
Description
Fixed version of version V1.1 (sorry!)
FAQ
Comments (7)
Hi. Really great model. My now favorite for Realistic pics. Two questions : in the description you mention "the model I use for my creation" -> for you LORA ?. What was the issue with v1.1 ? I tested it, it's the same as 1.2
I use this model primarily for my personal endeavors, so it's not particularly significant :)
The previous version (1.1) encountered certain difficulties with faces and background disturbances. Version 1.1 is great, but I think 1.2 is better.
@Cyberdelia ok thanks, some fine tuning between 1.1 & 1.2. Fantastic work !
@cyberdelia
New model, New comment (by me) .. :-)
I uploaded a comparison between the
30b3
1.2
1.0
icbitf
perfection2.0
perimus.. (to complicated)
Its done with (my self-called superprompt) on 120 tokens incl. negatives. No TI. Only 1 Lora (denoise - the psy variant with 2.6 and a cfg of 9) - SDE++ Kar. and 80 Steps. No color/sat./hue-prompts, ..
On my setup the skin-hue is getting better, its still hard (harder) to get a littler more skin-wrinkels.
I saw on some newer models that the eyes are sometimes has some manga-ish tendency. That was on 1.0 and 3.0b3 a little better.
As always .. great work, and all impressions are on my subjective Setup :-) .. Thanks. Smile-Smiley
add:
i am using the vae-ft-ema-560000-ema-pruned.safetensors instead of 84000 .. After many comparison, its for my taste much more crispy on tattoos and other details.
seems we enter the era of high contrast for everything
i start to call it the era of the "contrast shock"
it's interesting when you compare the genetical base of models how they evolved and which path some have gone and which models could be more or less twins by now :)
and which ones derive quiet a lot of the path of the others
Try using a low CFG (2) and see if it lowers the contrast.

