Hypernetwork Portraits

Link: https://civitai.com/models/5173/photovintagev15

It was uploaded before, if you look at it you idiot!!!!!

@michelangelo It was uploaded before!!!!!

Correct that's modell uploaded earlier

It is common for some weights to be similar to other models. Remember that almost all the trainings are done with the original SD 1.5 base... So if you train a "vintage" style model with your photographs (that handle the colors and textures of that photographic style), and I do the Same with my photographs... Most likely, there are similarities. Now... If someone says that they trained their model from scratch, without using any original SD base model, they are surely lying... Because that would be very expensive 😅

In the case of @hotfantasy_ai's model (Which looks great by the way)... They uploaded it first. Mine is more recent... So I don't think hotfantasy_ai is copying me O_O

In the case of my model, it is based on SD 1.5 and photographs taken by me (I have been a professional photographer for more than 15 years. So I have a good number of photographs to train various styles). And the Vintage style is my favorite without a doubt. 😎

I still left a link to the model in Huggin in case someone wants to use it to modify it, improve it or train something new with my model as a base. Honestly, that doesn't bother me. In the end I like the idea that knowledge is collective.

So I invite you to change the rating to 1 star. It's not fair for hotfantasy_ai to receive that rating when she's done a good job.

I don't even understand what this is all about, if he had used it or I would have used it, there would have been no problem

this is a community, together we make artificial intelligence better

I am asking everyone to leave the unjustified hatred

Absolutely. @klotz should remove or update the one star rating.

@hotfantasy_ai I think if you provided the metadata for your uploaded images, that would have cleared up a ton of confusion. The fact that there are several example images and none of them have any workflow info makes it seem like you are trying to obscure something. It could be that you aren't but it's hard to know. You might have inpainted the hell out of your examples such that they're not indicative of the model's potential at all, for example.