Made a Diives model a while ago but never got around to releasing it. So here it is.
Activation Tag: diives,
I tried training in the Xingzuo Temple characters, but it didn't work very well.
I may try again soon, but for now at least the Style works.
Description
FAQ
Comments (18)
Will this model include Xingzuo Temple characters in its dataset?
They weren't added by name, as that wasn't the goal of this LoRA, but with the right tags you should be able to get something close. Maybe I'll make LoRA's for each of them too, but I'm low on Buzz right now.
>a way for techbros who hit generate and then upload their shit without specifying it was AI to get called out. AI should never be hidden.
you really like making scenarios up in your head and then get mad about it LMAO
It's literally happening. people are making whole online shops on etsy and the like not stating that their sold works are AI generated.
@froot you really think a "tech bro" is doing that but also does not know about the spot healing brush? KEK.
@vrebakijiji535 There are many who are actually lazy enough (or uneducated enough) to hit Generate then upload the raw image. Yes, people will still filter through the net, but we can still make the holes smaller to catch the idiots.
@PopiAI I think youre the uneducated one, first of all we are talking about "TECH BROS" not Jimmys who just paid for AItrepreneur patreon to use his 1 click installer cuz he was too dumb to even install 1111.
second of all noone uploads straight pictures with all the metadata in it (prompt, steps, checkpoint, lora used etc) and it turns out photoshop batch image processor is one of the easiest ways to strip the metadata...
now PLEASE reply back with those 3 dudes out of 3+ millions that were to dumb to actually do this and got caught... cause that would definitely prove your point. /s
@vrebakijiji535 You sound angry. Have some tea.
@vrebakijiji535 "no one uploads straight pictures with all the metadata in it"
A lot of websites strip metadata to preserve memory and for user privacy.
And do you not realise there are many other ways to detect AI images aside from metadata anyway?
What are you trying to prove? "If people are too dumb to scam it's on them"? dawg you sound confused
@froot you sound like the elementary student trying to explain to me that 2+2 is 4, I know a lot of websites strip metadata (DUH), but do YOU know that many of those website are shitty image hosts? and not the websites with premium Paid tiers? and even Pixiv wich is not paid (unlike their sister site Fanbox) does not strip matadata.
>And do you not realise there are many other ways to detect AI images aside from metadata anyway?
this is LITERALLY a SELF OWN. that is exactely what I was saying and leaving the signature on to "stick it to the lazy techbros" is a very dumb take.. thank you for finally noticing ;)
@vrebakijiji535 ok techbro
@froot just take the L and stop wasting my time
@vrebakijiji535 OP presumably doesn't want to be affiliated with scammers, such as users selling AI art under the guise of being the artist themselves. Not everyone is chronically online enough to understand and identify AI, so they're vulnerable to scams, you silly goose.
@froot I am not doing this. the argument is over. just stop embarrassing yourself anymore.
@vrebakijiji535 Bro woke up today and chose brain damage
@jeffcena333 maybe but then again for me that's a one-off.. for some of you? that's just the usual.
Honestly, based.
Artists should know how close their inevitable doom is.
it got a great style accuracy, i like it