Fluenlty XL - the best XL-model
Introducing Fluently XL, you are probably ready to argue with the name of the model: “The best XL-model”, but now I will prove to you why it is true.
After the release of the Final version there will be no more updates? - Updates will be made as soon as they become available to improve.
About this model
The model was obtained through training on expensive graphics accelerators, a lot of work was done, now we will show why this XL model is better than others.
Features
Correct anatomy
Art and realism in one
Controling contrast
Great nature
Great faces without AfterDetailer
More info
Why do we say our model is the best? Simply put, most checkpoints are mixes of others; ours is trained, not mixed. If you have challenges at first, it may be because mixed models often respond the same way to the same prompts; freshly trained models have a learning curve. Feedback from amateurs and professionals alike tell us that you WILL love this model once you become accustomed to using it!
Using
Optimal parameters in Automatic1111/ComfyUI:
Sampling steps: 20-35
Sampler method: Euler a/Euler
CFG Scale: 4-6.5
End
Let's remove models that copy each other from the top and put one that is actually developing, thank you)
Description
This is the final release. Improved overall aesthetics, improved lighting and more.
After the release of the Final version there will be no more updates? - Updates will be made as soon as they become available to improve.
FAQ
Comments (19)
Correct Anatomy: How's it doing on finger count?
Good afternoon, it all depends on the industry and the situation itself, in most cases 4-5, we hope that you like the model.
@ehristoforu So far so, so good. It's like it was designed to generate "Oprah Winfrey running nude through a Bavarian Forrest screaming I LOVE BREAD".
I am not sure about trying this model JUST because of
At first it may seem that the model is not very good, but if you are a real professional you will like it.
"Ladies and gentlemen, I'd like to welcome you to the town of Gaslighting, population: YOU"
I agree that the statement is not worded very well, and it might SEEM a little shady. But I think that's just poor (English?) communication skills.
I'm not a "professional", and I have no direct ties with this model or it's author. But I can tell you that it is one of my favorite SDXL models. (and I have a LOT of them). This model excels in following prompts and generates unique images, Probably because it's Trained and not Merged.
I do a lot of Sci-Fi images and this model is really great for that genre.
I suggest you give it a try. I don't often write reviews or respond to comments, but in this case I thought it was worth giving my opinion.
Hello, thank you for your feedback on the model, I will take your comment into account, the model is really better than others, it is the only one that trains and does not mix, have a nice day)
@Leee1414 That's awesome that you took the time to validate your experience with the model, thanks! I'll give it a shot.
@ehristoforu Thanks for responding. Might I suggest changing Our model is better than others because we do not mix but train, but at first it may seem that the model is not very good, but if you are a real professional you will like it.
TO
Why do we say our model is the best? Simply put, most checkpoints are mixes of others; ours is trained, not mixed. If you have challenges at first, it may be because mixed models often respond the same way to the same prompts; freshly trained models have a learning curve. Feedback from amateurs and professionals alike tell us that you WILL love this model once you become accustomed to using it!
Edited. Thanks a lot, @getspastic!
@ehristoforu @ehristoforu @ehristoforu @ehristoforu De nadda.
Nice model! It does make a lot of the images look like they have a soft focus and softlight applied, --- so I wonder how can I make pictures with better focus and with deep color, better contrast, less softlight and less soft focus? I tried the relevant triggerwords, but nothing really changed, so how do I get colors similar to the demo images on this page?
Hello! Thank you for your interest in our model, I hope the instructions below will help you.
- Try playing with CFG Scale
- Use this negative prompt: cartoon, 3D, disfigured, bad, art, deformed, extra limbs, weird, blurry, duplicate, morbid, mutilated, out of frame, extra fingers, mutated hands, poorly drawn, hands, poorly drawn face, mutation, ugly, bad, anatomy, bad proportions, extra limbs, clone, clone-faced, cross proportions, missing arms, malformed limbs, missing legs, mutated, hands, fused fingers, too many fingers, photo shop, video game, ugly , tiling, cross-eye, mutation of eyes, long neck, bonnet, hat, beanie, cap, B&W
- Apply tokens: depth of field, (closeup:0.75), cinematic light, dynamics, sharp picture
- If you use the Fooocus interface, disable the Fooocus V2, Fooocus Sharp styles
I hope these instructions will help you, if anything please contact me)
Please provide lightning or hyper version of latest Fluently-XL model. Thanks a lot for this great model. It is providing great quality images.
Good afternoon, thank you for your interest in the model, we will upload everything soon)
@ehristoforu Thanks a lot for reply. Please upload the latest lightning version soon. Your model is the really the best SDXL model. Thanks
@arnold123 you right. need lighting version! author please!!!! (or create alternativ speed render :-))
Uploaded.
@ehristoforu Please provide lightning version of the latest final model. The V3 lightning 4S version is giving good images in diffusers script. So, please provide lightning version of the latest final model. Thanks a lot.
I liked this model; it has that magic of RealvisXL 4.0 that few achieve and gives good results without deformity in the first generation, but it loses the ability to apply styles such as by Bob Eggleton, by Alphonse Mucha, by Hokusai, etc.