Version 7.
Fixed the issue with body proportions. You still can obtain extreme body proportions with loras of course.
Right now, I'm using:
UI: ComfyUI with comfyui_facetools (a rotation aware face extractor/merger made by me) to fix the faces
positive quality prompt: masterpiece, best quality, drop_shadow, subsurface scattering
negative quality prompt: extra_hands, extra_arms, bad_anatomy, fat, overweight, abs, muscular, fat_rolls, pubic_hair badhandv4 realisticvision-negative-embedding epiCNegative
1st pass:
sampler: dpm++ 3m sde
cfg: 3.8
steps: 20
HiRes and subsequent (like face detailer) pass:
sampler: dpm++ 2m sde
cfg: 4
steps: 8
upscaler:
model: 4x_NMKD-Siax_200k
controlnet: I know this can be a bit surprising, but it works really well in my use cases. The trick is to give some freedom to the inpaint controlnet with
Scaled Soft Weightsand inpaint the whole image, no mask. So, if there was noScaled Soft Weights, or ifbase_multiplierwas set to 1.0, it would have no effect, as it would repaint the same picture as the one provided inimage
Version 6.
cfg scale can be quite different. I got nice results from 2.5 to 7 (I haven't really tried higher). Also v6 doesn't even need quality tokens in the positive prompt to give good results. At least as long as realisticvision-negative-embedding and epicrealism-neg are in the negative prompt.
Version 5.
The model should require less token in both positive and negative prompt to get realistic results, now.
Low CFG scale ~2.5 gives a nice photo-realistic look to the picture and allows you to go a bit crazier with the weighting in the prompts.
Heun sampler with as low as 8 steps also gives quite nice results.
Version 4.
Initially built to create lifelike portraits of characters from the novel I'm working on, whose title is Endless, thus the name of the model.
This is a rather complex merge, and sadly I did not took notes.
Prompting
Example of prompt for a realistic image (replace {prompt} with your subject):
professional photograph
{prompt}
((video grainyfilm)), natural cinematic lighting, ((professional photo highly defined))
realistic, best quality, photo-realistic
8k, best quality, masterpiece, realistic, photo-realisticYou can add more details using this lora which gives pretty good results: Detail Tweaker LoRA (细节调整LoRA)
Example of negative prompt for a realistic image:
(text, signature, watermark, logo, ux, ui:1.3), monochrome, (2D), (3D), ((camera)), ((cartoony)), (CGI), ((drawing)), ((lowres)), ((painting)), ((sketchy)), ((The Sims)), (ugly), ((blur)) (worst quality, low quality, normal quality:1.3), lowresNSFW content is possible, nsfw, uncensored in the negative prompt can help get rid of them.
More tips on prompting
You can actually use negative weights on lora/lycoris. Here is an obvious example with Microwaist Lora:

Using this, you can use Sharpness Tweaker LoRA (锐度调整LoRA) to lower the sharpness of the image, resulting in a somewhat more realistic picture as if it had been taken by an old camera. Here is an example showing the effect on girls of various ethnicities:

Description
FAQ
Comments (14)
Hello, can you tell me more about version 6. I think it has become better in terms of realism, but it almost always draws very thin girls. And even when trying to create a curvy figure, the waist remains very thin.
You can try https://civitai.com/models/4602/waist-slider-microwaist with a negative weight and see if that works.
Maybe I'm doing something wrong, but Lora is ruining the image.
is occsan an embedding? where can I find it? Thank you, I think this is the greatest model for reality
Occsan is the main character of the novel I'm working on. I trained her embedding from ~3000 pictures something like a year ago and refined it since. That may sound silly, since she's not a real person, but I'd rather keep her embedding private. Some silly fondness from me, I guess.
thank you! this makes sense. I was keeping to try to get the same results and wondering what I was doing wrong :-)
i have no words .. the best realistic model right now.
Contrary to what's being advised, I get way better results at Clip Skip 2.
Where is the description for version 6? Does the CFG scale is the same for version 6 ?
cfg scale can be quite different. I got nice results from 2.5 to 7 (I haven't really tried higher). Also I recently (today in fact) realized that v6 doesn't even need quality tokens in the positive prompt to give good results. At least as long as realisticvision-negative-embedding and epicrealism-neg are in the negative prompt. I'll probably do more tests later to see how far this goes.
@davcha please write this in your description. I tend to forget about this.
will you do new versions? or for SDXL?
v7 is coming soon™
COOL! Your model is my favorite for generating my elfs :)