This is a model specialized in creating NSFW comic-style drawings, excelling in lighting and vibrant colors. It's capable of generating numerous characters for games and comics, specifically those of my favorites on rule34. There are still some issues with poses and hands, which are common with sd1.5. This model has been trained on many close-up facial and partial-body images but not excessively far ones. If you create an image with a face too far away, I recommend using hires fix and adetailed.
Reminder: model can create femboy, trap, futanari, wide hips, flat chest, chubby, big tits, androgynous
If you like my content, support me at:
Patreon in here:
https://linktr.ee/Duc_Haiten
If you want to use my models to create unlimited images at a small cost without having to install anything, mage.space will be a good choice, i have some models that are exclusively available on there.
Negative prompt:
(worst quality:1.5), (low quality:1.5), (normal quality:1.5), lowres, bad anatomy, bad hands, vaginas in breasts, ((monochrome)), ((grayscale)), collapsed eyeshadow, multiple eyebrow, (cropped), oversaturated, extra limb, missing limbs, deformed hands, long neck, long body, imperfect, (bad hands), signature, watermark, username, artist name, conjoined fingers, deformed fingers, ugly eyes, imperfect eyes, skewed eyes, unnatural face, unnatural body, error, painting by bad-artist
Sampling steps: 40
Sampling method: DPM++ 2M SDE Heun Exponential
CFG scale: 6
clip skip: 1 but, in some cases 2, 3, 4 will be better
Description
FAQ
Comments (27)
This model looks v v cool. Unfortunately, it's extremely frustrating how difficult it is to trigger anything male.
Like - for context: without a LoRA I need to rerun a render three to four times to get a male... N that's w negative "(Woman, girl, female, hetero, feminine:1.5), "
It's true that it's a bit difficult
@digitalghosts Have you tried using Zovya's Gender Slider? I just did a very quick test and saw what you're seeing, with the male characters I did get being quite feminine, but Gender Slider completely put a stop to it without even needing feminine terms in the negative prompt. It's potent stuff.
@A1322 I will definitely play with this - thanks for the heads up!
That's a problem a lot of models (that are not specificely made for male depiction) have. I have that issue with my own models and its simpley because there is way more female data in most models because almost all models contain some of the early custom made models witch are mostly based on nsfw with female focus. But the male enjoyer side of the community is hard at work to even the field out. Give it a little more time and sooner or later all models will be good at depicting males.
If you like comic art maybe check out my lates version. I tryed hard to get good male depiction into it. It's not perfect yet but it is on the way ;-)
https://civitai.com/models/151774/comicmixnsfw-by-mrmonster-or-model?modelVersionId=334734
In December 2023, why release this as a 1.5 model rather than an XL model?
Not to speak for DucHaiten, but it's certainly easier and faster to train a 1.5 model. But also, as the download numbers on Civitai will attest, SD1.5 is still where most of the userbase is. I'm not sure when or how that might change, if ever.
@A1322
I'm the creator of Epic Diffusion (https://civitai.com/models/3855/epic-diffusion)
Ever since I discovered SDXL, I don't really see any reason to use 1.x models anymore, except for some rare uze cases
sdxl has too large data, it is difficult to work with it, especially non-realistic and NSFW genres.
Not everyone has a PC strong enough to use SDXL
Even for regular users, sd1.5 can still meet their needs more closely, while sdxl is often more suitable for custom-made models with a specific goal or theme.
@DucHaiten
I don't have a powerful PC myself.
I currently run SDXL for free either through Mage, Nightcafé, Musavir, CivitAI or tensor.art.
Overall, my experience with SDXL is that the quality of the output of the default model is far superior to pretty much any 1.x model out there. And custom models or LORAs can take it even further.
I never really had much issues creating NSFW content in SDXL and even created my own LORA with pretty decent support for nudes of both sexes (https://civitai.com/models/206996/johnslegersart-nudes).
@A1322 I was reluctant to move from 1.x to SDXL after my very poor experience with 2.x.
But once I tried SDXL, I was immediately hooked. And I haven't returned to 1.x since, really...
Considering there's so many platforms that offer generations with SDXL for free, I don't see why anyone would still use 1.x anymore...
@johnslegers Everyone's preferences are different. Personally, I still appreciate SDXL in some aspects. Maybe sd1.5 the detail aspect, accuracy and flexibility are all worse than SDXL, but SD1.5 is still superior in terms of universal aspect and image material
Pardon for interupt your convensation johnslegers, SDXL really lack of tools for modifcations, for many people who use SD to assist the works, SDXL's suck. For those just use website to generate some images just for fun, SDXL is ok but for making something more professional or works SD 1.5 100%, any weakest of SD 1.5 compare with SDXL can be compensated by extensions and tricks, SDXL can't do the same
@Wardensc
SDXL has support for LORAs & ControlNet.
What kind of stuff are we talking about that could can't do with SDXL + LORAs + ControlNet that is possible with SD 1.x?
@johnslegers Just use SDXL drawing something like this then we'll talk, all of these images I only use SD 1.5 https://imgur.com/a/wvTl2Tb
You are incredible. Thank you. When extra income comes my way, it's all yours. You deserve the world for giving people access to incredible tools to express what they otherwise would not be able to. The quality is beyond amazing, per usual.
Thank you, your praise is a prize for me 😍
Add onsite generation please 🫥
dude, I'm making money on another photo creation website, I posted it here just to share it with everyone but that doesn't mean I want to reduce the amount of money I earn, unless civitai decides to pay money's worth for this model
@DucHaiten if you add onsite generation why would you loose money?
Mage is stupidly slow, CivitAI is fast
@kellne because mage pays me, but civitai doesn't
@DucHaiten, hi. It's interesting, but the license of their site is not too pleasant at first glance, it looks like "we'll do with everything that you download whatever we want, and you can't be against it." What do you think about it?
Of course, we are just small authors, but the author wants to keep the ability to control his creation. On tensorart, for example, I can sort out reprints and just remove my model through the administration in 15 minutes. It seems that mage does not provide such an opportunity at all, or do I understand something wrong?
One of my favorites on mage
This model has just a great style! Cool comic drawing with an admixture of pencil and watercolor illustrations, a very expressive rich color palette... I was pleased with the anatomy, there were almost no glitches. The only drawback is the excessive female focus. Great, I really liked it! Thanks!