The next iteration in the LimitlessVision evolution. Excels in photorealism, analog, and cinematic. Will give accurate representations of both male and female anatomy and those between.
Description
Version 3 with VAE baked in for those that want it
FAQ
Comments (21)
There is a serious facial problem, especially the area around the nose and mouth, does not look nice
This can usually be fixed with prompt. But, I agree this is an issue. I am actively working on a couple datasets to help. Thank you for speaking up. Also, you can DM me and we can see if I can help in the interim
If find that using ADetailer with another checkpoint like CyberrealisticXL works pretty well. This model seems very good though, well done Silas! (ps: any plans for a Pony version? :p )
@Icey64 to be honest, I used Pony in some of the training. Without going into too many details, I basically trained multiple models, one of those models used pony base, the others SDXL. I then block merged the qualities I wanted from each into a main model. It is a true Frankenstein, but a fun one.
@SilasAI6609 Checkpoint goes too easily to futanari mode even it is on negative prompts. Even so much that checkpoint is nearly unusable with certain prompts. As soon a man just shows his dingdong to the woman, there is extremely high chance that extra unwanted appendige pops out of woman. Then again, most of CivitAI checkpoints have same exact problem. Maybe it's cursed Pony heritage but it ruins lots of images.
@RobotCatsAreCoolKillers it is a blend of issues. True, Pony does not help with that, but SDXL does not do any better. Feel free to DM me and we can review some prompts. I may be able to help you out. My Reddit link is here on my profile, and I am also in the UnstableDiffusion discord under the same name.
Can't use this model on Civit, please consider putting it on Tensor.art to so people can use it.
Thank you for the suggestion. I have not used tensor in a very long time. I will check it out. If I host on there, I will be sure to let you know.
@SilasAI6609 Thank you
@Gentileschi tried to add, looks like other users already claimed my models as their own on Tensor, so I am locked out of being able to upload the newest version...so, until this is resolved, I will be unable to share this version.
@SilasAI6609 Is that your link or the person that claimed your model?
@Gentileschi I was able to claim this model, so it is my link
It is usless, it adds random dicks to all females without prompt. Maybe if you want to make futa content it is ok, but come on, model must respect prompts, if no male prick in prompt it should not be drawn at all. Probably author lacks experience in training and just used non tagged gay porn to train this model.
I appreciate your honesty and I apologize that you are having issues. I have been fine-tuning models for 2 years, so, I am not lacking experience. However, like many models, the way you prompt is important, and no model can be prompted the same. If you would share some of your prompts, I might be able to help you out. Feel free to reach me here, Reddit, or the UnstableDiffusion discord.
The complaint is hilarious, given that virtually every model I've ever used has tried to add vaginas to men at least once. It's refreshing to hear that this model did the opposite for this one person.
@VersGeek I try to be fair, and as non-biased in my approach to training. I also try to listen when people bring up issues. I have run no less than 5k test gens on this model. Aside from multiple char gens, I have seen few issues with cross gender. But, being that I created the model, I will prompt more towards being successful. I was hoping the OP would share some prompts so I could do some tests.
@SilasAI6609 I love your models, and would agree that yours are fair. I’ve been using your 1.5 model on and off for a while. And wanting to improve is always a good thing, so I didn’t mean to contradict or sideline your request for more info from OP…
But it’s frustrating to see someone complain about a model that’s good at generating gay content when I can’t name a single model that HASN’T tried to add a vagina to a man at some point when I’ve tried to use them. Most models think that penises are some kind of finger trap toy that meld together when two men kiss. My negative prompt has to include a variety of synonyms for women and their body parts and hetero just to start working.
And it’s nearly impossible for me to figure out the basic question of “does this model work with men” on this site. I have to toggle “Apply my filters” constantly and filter out women in order to see if a man shows up, and usually I still have to scroll through pages of animals, cars, and scenery before I hit one on some models.
So while I commend you for listening to OP and wanting to improve your models based on feedback, I am still calling their comment out for being hilariously unaware of how privileged and entitled it is.
/rant
@VersGeek I get it. Thank you for the kind words. That is literally why I started training models. When I started two years ago, there were 0 models making realistic penises. So, I started on making a model that could only do male genitals. But, I soon realized there may be others in the same boat that are underrepresented in the community. So, I set off to make a model that could make any gender preference possible without the need for extra stuff like LoRAs. Is it perfect? Hell no, but it is the culmination of my efforts, and I hope it helps others.
Solid reliable checkpoint, thank you!
I appreciate your feedback!
Details
Available On (1 platform)
Same model published on other platforms. May have additional downloads or version variants.