IntoRealism

Why v4.0 > v5.0?

@elpsykongroo15270 if you ask me, yes

I've agree with enzino, your settings should be broken.

@enzino None of your sample photos have nude breasts. The only way to get them somewhat normal/natural/small is by using statements like "petite slim natural proportions". but if you say "natural small breasts" they will in most cases not be small and not natural looking. Mentioning breasts in general makes them larger.

@Reelai they are far from broken

that's the issue though with this model. although its one of the better checkpoints, it uses grainy and low light to gain that realistic effect. And in turn is difficult to get normal lighting conditions.

@enzino is that a comfyui thing? i feel sometimes staying on webui forge has to work extra hard since we have no custom workflows. i gotta get more memory before going back to comfyui.

@Melodic_Possible_582589 idk maybe, but my settings were 20 steps, and multi res beta sampler.

@Starry_Eyes are you using neo? if so 20 steps is too much. 9-12. Multi res should be paired with simple or sgm uniform. Beta is too strong.

@Starry_Eyes also depends on your generation size? what is it?

@Melodic_Possible_582589 1216*832, also ive been switching between sgm, simple, and beta,

@Starry_Eyes mind sharing your prompt and settings? Also, depends on the power of your pc. I have a 3080 and can do 1280x960 with 3 batch size. If I do 1920x1440 then I must do 3 batch count with 1 batch size or else it freezes. With the higher resolution, you won't need to upscale. If you're not sure then just do a count and size of 1 for testing.

@Melodic_Possible_582589 I'll experiment with higher reses. I should be able to do bigger on my 3070. but it might take a bit longer to render. for my settings, im just using the default zit turbo workflow. With prompts like 8k, HD, photorealism, cinematic, etc.

@Starry_Eyes tag style prompt affects your output depending on length. If you have a length of around 100 or less then the realism should still stay. But the more you go the system steps away from realism. This is only based on my personal observation.

@enzino I really love its realism capacity. Finest. As every one else, face is an issue here sir. You mentioned "chins are too prominent" , I have generated imges with prominent chins they come out really beautiful in regular ZIT bf16 Model. In this Model the problem is not chins, the problem is prominent jawline and smaller chins plus the faces are too chubby. I hope we will get improvement in these regards. Wishing you best. Thank you for your efforts.

@enzino I’d like to share my experience, which differs slightly from the original comment. First of all, great job on this checkpoint. Interestingly, I don't experience any blurring issues with faces or backgrounds—something that really impressed me about this model; the backgrounds come out crisp. My only complaint concerns ethnic diversity. The faces generated aren't particularly varied or "pretty." If it’s not too much to ask—and I apologize for the presumption—I’d appreciate it if the next version included more ethnic diversity and beauty, leaning more towards the "Instagram model" look when specified in the prompt. The same goes for body types: the ability to create smaller waists, wider hips, and larger breasts and buttocks. I know there are LoRAs for this—in fact, I’ve tried a few, though I’m not sure they worked well (I’d say they didn't). Perhaps the model isn't very compatible with LoRAs. Thanks again for the great work you do, and I hope you’ll consider this request.