v3.0 update
Please use v3.0 with v3.3g workflow
https://civarchive.com/models/933018/
v2.0 update
Better prompt following, Better consistency. Work greate with IC_TRY_ON lora:
Prompt Example:
Flux Template:
[SIDE_BY_SIDE], The image pair highlights a product sample to the well designed product advertisement; [SAMPLE_IMAGE] {Image1_desc}; [PRODUCT_IMAGE] {Image2_desc};
Input Image Description Refer to [IMAGE1]:
an illustration of a stylized tree with black branches and green leaves, adorned with pink flowers. A small bird is perched on one of the branches, and another bird is flying nearby. The background is white, and there is a simple depiction of grass at the base of the tree
Output Image Description Refer to [IMAGE2]:
In a serene dusk outdoor setting, a [SAMPLE_IMAGE] illustration printed on a t-shirt as a well designed product, fullbody shot of a whiteman wear the t shirt in a gardon
As newly discoved in context lora usage of Flux.
https://ali-vilab.github.io/In-Context-LoRA-Page/
We could use image as condition to generate similar output.
I introduce this workflow to simply remove the ic-lighting and inpainting models for product background editing.
This lora trained with very few images which is a weak guidance and weak generalization.
If it is usaful, please give me some buzz for further training.
Please use with the following workflow:
https://civarchive.com/models/933018/workflows-flux-in-context-lora-for-product-design
Feel free to dm me if you have any query.
Contact: [email protected]
QQ Group: 866612947
Description
FAQ
Comments (5)
Version 1 and 2 numbers seem mixed up, picking V2 at the top links to a download for a safetensor called V1 e6
The filename is not important. It is the correct version of v2. It trained differently than v1 and I put them together.
Hello, so from this link , it means that only a deisgn focused lora is made out of the In context loras ? Or this product design lora can be used for all the various examples shown in the paper ?
IC consis is mainly designed to improve image consistent between two images. Sometime v2 is better and something v3 is better. Different ic lora were try on different purpose.
I'm a bit confused. You say "use v3.0 with v2.3 workflow" but in your patch notes for the lora you say "v2.1: removed lora" and it seems like that's the case. no IC lora in the later workflows. Do they still achieve the same goal but don't need it anymore? What's the improvement gained from removing the lora
Details
Files
Available On (2 platforms)
Same model published on other platforms. May have additional downloads or version variants.



