I like that you had a idea in mind lol

@StecFX A male-focused model, eh? I hope you're equipped with body armor, because the feminists will be after you soon enough. Lucky for you, I can offer the tools you need to fend them off power, protection, whatever you desire. All I ask in return... is your soul.

@digitalghosts I may be the devil, but my mind is as sharp as ever. Flattery won’t save your soul when the time comes, though I do appreciate the gesture. Kindness is nice, but when the hour strikes, mercy will be the last thing you’ll find.

@ELDiablo Damn your entire profile is the cringiest shit I've seen on this site, and I post gay yaoi. Either you're doing it ironically as a performance, or you're a sad little dude lol.

@Nee_Vee_Noir It's based on reality, I am sorry if reality offends you.

@ELDiablo I really hope you're just playing a character man, otherwise I really feel bad for you.

@StecFX exactly what i wrote.

@omegablast20023899 He did it intentionally, likely. Smart enough to train this model, but not smart enough to tell what images are not ok? Press X to doubt.

Edit: Nvm, model is skewed towards teen and preteen output. Don't know what those guys are merging with, but I'd suggest staying away from this and a bunch of other recent Pony "homoerotic" mixes.

Having used this model a lot recently, I can say this hasn't been my experience whatsoever.That being said, I am generating women with it. Women with dicks..

@Eggbena try with male gens, youll see what im talking about...

What an absurd thing to say - if ur making kids that's on you

@digitalghosts im judging YOU based on the images you decided to showcase for this model as well as those posted to your gallery on this site. you can gas light and deflect all you want.

@StecFX nah, it's just not true. Been using it for males and didn't see anything weird. This model generates pretty much any kind of male you ask for, so it's not even biased towards twinks. Not that it would be a bad thing neither, but it's not the case. That user is probably just a troll. Report them if they keep spreading that kind of lies and that's it. CP is too serious of a matter to be launching vague accusations like that so easily.

@PepitoPalotes shrug i said what i said....

@PepitoPalotes 'young adult man' generates a preteen with a boner. I could imagine model creator being from an extra liberal country, but for most of the world, owning a copy of this model is a risk.

Even 'twinks', aka 'teen looking guys' is in fact a touchy subject in a lot of places on this planet, believe it or not. CP - includes everything from up to legal age. In many places it's 17.

@UndefinedUsername I just tried and it's just not true. 8 out of 8 random generations with the prompt 'a young adult' man returned a man in his twenties. And even if it was, the reasonable thing to do would be to message the author just in case some model in the merge has something they are not aware of, so they can solve it. And may be if they refuse to check it, THEN, say the stuff you are saying here. But you two didn't do that, and considering it's not even true, this just looks like some kind of personal attack and I don't even want to know why.

@UndefinedUsername I just noticed I tested it using also the prompt suggested in the model description, so I did another test without it, only with 'a young adult man', and now they seem younger... But it returns twinks (not preteens, just exactly young adult men), and ZERO of them in any sexual context, or even nude.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯

@PepitoPalotes you can literally see children in the showcased images on this model....those are children.

@UndefinedUsername these gas lighters are desperately trying to avoid that i mention the images used to showcase this model contains exact examples of the "children" im talking about....lol, best not to beat a dead horse, of course they will divert and distract and gas light...

@omegablast20023899  sure, if someone points out that you may be wrong, that is gaslight, so no point in discussing anything because it's always gaslighting or something.
I didn't want to write so much, but I'm being accused of gaslighting here, so I'll explain why I bothered answering at all. Fare warning: Big chunk of text incoming.

1.- The people on those images don't exist. They are not real. To me, the younger ones look like they could be 18 maybe, which could be on the fringe, but as it's a subjective impression and not everybody develops at the same rate, if they were real people, you could ask them to be sure. That's why there are laws preventing minors from doing porn. But in these cases, if you consider them minors, that's just your decision in your imagination because they are not real. Though, if you find it uncomfortable, instead of going aggressive you could have just suggested the author to avoid images that could raise doubts. And who knows, may be they would have listened. They are taking other suggestions pretty well, as long as they are respectful, so there is that.

2.- You are talking about "children", and all children are minors but not all minors are children. @UndefinedUsername even lied saying it generated "preteens" with the prompt "adult young man", which I tested and wasn't true. I even verified that the model is not biased towards twinks, as I usually do because it's a usual bias and twinks are not really my cup of tea. Any minor involved in porn is wrong, unethical, and illegal, even if they are 17 years and a half old, but using the word "children" here more alarming and not very accurate. But you did choose that word and it raised all the alarms. I actually tested the model because of your comment, because I was honestly worried.

3.- EVERY single model can, potentially, generate children because there are non-sexual images of children on the dataset of all base models. The problem is not if a model can generate children, but if there was CP on the dataset, in which case there would be a serious ethical and even legal problem, and the community is usually vigilant against it. That's why your comment made me check, because if this was one of those cases, real kids would have been abused and just thinking of it makes me sick. And it has happened in the past in other cases, and models were removed from their platforms after someone found out. That's why if you suspect that it could be the case for a model, and it's a merge, you should contact the author because they may not be aware, and they would be the first person interested in identifying the problematic model, remove it from the merge, and even report it. But after checking it, I really don't see any reason to think this could be the case. That's why you exaggeration bothered me: Because the problem is real, and it's serious, but it's just not here.

@PepitoPalotes *wall of text* i said what i said. 5 months later im summoned back here yet again by a reaction, i will put the final verdict on the table for all to see. you will notice that even the site admins which are usually watching their site playing blind the whole time have agreed that the images that were used in the show case broke community guidelines. as every single that i was complaining about, are gone. except maybe one of a childish looking twink. so before you all decide to react to a 5 months old post, do note, that the images used in the showcase now are NOT the original ones that were put up before.