An albumen print is a type of photographic print made from a negative on which a layer of egg white, specifically egg albumen, is used as the binder for light-sensitive materials. It was a popular photographic process during the 19th century, particularly from the 1850s to the 1890s.
The albumen print process begins with coating a sheet of paper with a solution made from egg whites mixed with salt. Once the coating dries, the paper is sensitized by immersing it in a solution containing silver nitrate. This sensitized paper is then exposed to light through a negative, resulting in a latent image.
After exposure, the paper is developed using a developer solution, typically gallic acid or pyrogallic acid, which converts the exposed silver salts into metallic silver. The image is then fixed to remove any unexposed silver salts, making it permanent and stable.
Albumen prints are known for their tonal range, sharpness, and fine detail. The use of egg albumen as the binder gives the print a glossy surface and helps to hold the light-sensitive materials in place, enhancing the image's clarity and definition.
In terms of aesthetics, albumen prints often have warm tones, with a range of brown, sepia, or purple hues. The process was commonly used for portrait photography, as well as landscape, architectural, and documentary photography during the 19th century.
Albumen prints played a significant role in the history of photography, serving as a precursor to later photographic processes. They are appreciated today for their historical value and the unique aesthetic qualities they impart, providing a glimpse into the early days of photography and the artistry of the era.
Description
FAQ
Comments (6)
Really interesting style. Are you planning to make a 1.5 version?
@dulltrim No, switch smoothly to new versions.
SD 2.2(XL) will be released soon, and everyone is holding on to SD1.5
@Kappa_Neuro I don't think it's possible to make a smooth transition. 99% of the LoRA models on this site is for 1.5 and some extensions don't work with 2.1. If i'm going to use your LoRA I have to go back and forth between 1.5 and 2.1 while also being unable to combine it with my 1.5 LoRA models.
@Kappa_Neuro Kappa, I'll be crude, you can't really make porn in anything over 1.5, that's why everyone wants to keep 1.5 and why 1.5 is getting so many new tools every now and then, unless the filter in SD is removed, I don't think anyone can upgrade, is a silly thing? I don't think so, the porn industry is titanic, porn moves a lot of people, and even some "normal" actual artists do NSFW at least for themselves, of course do what you want, this is a free world in the end, but this is just me explaining the reasoning.
@anaccountfordrawing I don't care about the porn, but I have seen comparisons showing that SD 2.0 and 2.1 have more trouble following your prompt then 1.5 have.
@dulltrim Yeah, if you put any filter at all in any AI type of thing, the bot starts failing, is way more notorious in text models, image models are still useable raw, but text models need jail breaks and other hacky solutions for okayish results, at least we got a nice model to wait until people realize is not worth the effort to filter stuff.