CivArchive
    Eldritch Romance Illustration - v1.0
    NSFW
    Preview 8140336
    Preview 8140334
    Preview 8140715
    Preview 8140338
    Preview 8140331
    Preview 8140335
    Preview 8140349
    Preview 8140339
    Preview 8140333
    Preview 8140337
    Preview 8140345
    Preview 8140340
    Preview 8140343
    Preview 8140341
    Preview 8140344
    Preview 8140332
    Preview 8140347
    Preview 8140346
    Preview 8140348

    Romantic light and color illustration

    Version 1.3 notes: this model started by training on some classic illustrators (JC Leyendecker and Maxfield Parrish prominently) but quickly moved more digital, still taking something of the DNA of classic illustration, especially in terms of romantic light and coloring. Initial versions suffer from some awful drawing at times.

    this latest version marginally improves drawing of hands and faces (roughly about as consistent as base SDXL without LoRAs or Refiner) but greatly improves on consistency of lighting and romanticism.

    For the most part, you needn't even use any keyword. But if your imagery turns too photographic, insert 'illustration' somewhere and it should get back on track.

    I don't know if I can do more to improve on the hands ... but if I can there will be future versions of this LoRA still to come.

    Description

    We're done with beta versions - this is 1-point-OH!

    FAQ

    Comments (9)

    kubilayanMar 18, 2024
    CivitAI

    Amazing style.

    eldritchadam
    Author
    Mar 18, 2024· 1 reaction

    thanks so much! It may see another version update if I can polish up some of its wonkier elements. But I won't upload anything if it's at the expense of the current overall aesthetic.

    phil866Mar 20, 2024
    CivitAI

    which sdxl model was this trained on? just base?

    eldritchadam
    Author
    Mar 20, 2024· 3 reactions

    the base model, yes. That's always my approach, to maximize compatibility. But I also have a strong personal preference for the base model, using LoRAs to reach specific styles rather than custom checkpoints. Any custom checkpoint, even as it refines some aspect, is destructive of the initial SDXL's versatility. The more valuable custom checkpoints, in my mind, are anime - but that's just wholly outside my personal interests. So for me, it's all about the base model!

    ccccjmg777Mar 29, 2024· 1 reaction
    CivitAI

    This is great, do you have SD 1.5 version available?

    eldritchadam
    Author
    Mar 29, 2024

    sorry - I've somehow just never had any luck training for SD1.5 so far. I'll keep giving it a go, but there must be a crucial gap in my understanding of LoRA training. Everything I've tried has turned out to be pure garbage.

    ccccjmg777Mar 30, 2024

    @eldritchadam Can you tell me which large model you used to train this LoRA? I would like to make an attempt, thank you

    eldritchadam
    Author
    Mar 30, 2024

    @ccccjmg777 Base SDXL. I'm something of a purist about it. I hardly ever use the fine tuned models. I don't need either the anime or the NSFW content that most fine tunes are largely trying to improve on.

    ccccjmg777Mar 30, 2024

    @eldritchadam I understand, thank you for your reply

    LORA
    SDXL 1.0

    Details

    Downloads
    1,199
    Platform
    CivitAI
    Platform Status
    Available
    Created
    3/18/2024
    Updated
    5/12/2026
    Deleted
    -

    Files

    EldritchRomanceIllustration_1.0.5.safetensors

    Available On (1 platform)

    Same model published on other platforms. May have additional downloads or version variants.