Does everything a PonyXL model can, but "nearly" photorealistic!
V4 update, improved faces and lighting trained in.
Workflow I use to create the preview images sdxlpony-face-and-upscale-civitai-metadata
What it does:
If you're familiar with Pony models, they are very specific in their prompting and subject focus. I made this model to work the same way, but get closer to photorealistic. It uses the same prompting and LoRAs that other PonyXL models use.
What it doesn't do:
It's not a general model. Like other PonyXL models, it's more designed to work with booru tags and mostly does images with people in them. If you want to make general images, use a standard SDXL model.
What's coming:
PonyXL is trained on images with "exaggerated" anatomy. So I've purposely kept it from getting too photorealistic for the moment due to uncanny valley issues. As I train it more, I'll bring it closer to photoreal. In the meantime, use prompts such as (realistic photograph, depth of field, bokeh, etc) to help get the photo look.
How to use:
I recommend using the standard SDXL VAE. CFG should range from 7 to 10, higher than other models. You can experiment with different samplers. I prefer DPM++ 2S a Karras for consistency and DPM++ 3M SDE Exponential to get wild. Prompting for quality should use the score system like other PonyXL models. (score_9, score_8_up, score_7_up) in the positive prompt and (score_3_up, score_4_up, score_5_up) in the negative prompt. Otherwise your images will be very plain.
Alternately, you can use the Pony PDXL embeddings that I created for much easier use.
Description
FAQ
Comments (70)
Does V3 have VAE baked-in?
Amazing, can't wait to do full blown use in Auto, it's amazing <3
Where do i find the zPDXL2 and zPDXL2-neg embedding?
it's an update to this embedding https://civitai.com/models/332646?modelVersionId=372656
I'm trying to upload it but there's problems uploading the negative, I've contacted the site admins
@Zovya Thanx, i found the embedding but no v2 Version. So i have to wait.
Thank you for your service.
I was very much looking forward for the next version, but this one is not for my needs. I want to achieve grungy, textured, dirty skin, and this version does completely the opposite, making skin smooth, shiny and clean (albeit with better lighting indeed).
It does provide somewhat better coherence of poses over v2 when using loras and IP adapters, but what I perceive to be plastic aspect is not realistic for me. Sadly reverting to v2 for the moment.
perhaps a lora for that type of skin might be a better option
@Zovya I am using a lora of my own for that type of skin, and this version "neutralizes" it by a lot, compared to v2
The description on the model says "So I've purposely kept it from getting too photorealistic for the moment due to uncanny valley issues." So no, this probably isn't going to be the model you want. Personally I hope they keep making it the way they see fit.
I've used a lot of the photorealistic ones and there's still a lot of quality issues with all of them. The compromise this one makes is solid.
@dfjunkmail Just stating my impressions for this version, and looking forward for the next one which I hope will be more photorealistic (at least for me)
@SAC020 it's been tough finding the perfect model for flexibility and realism. the previous mklan pony model was pretty good but the new one this week, although the most realistic and least glitchy one i've used, takes a bit too much coercing to get the prompts right.
I've been experimenting with this model for more realism this morning though and think these are my favorite settings so far. Still more CGI-like as expected but provides a little less "plastic" imo:
Steps: 25, Sampler: DPM++ 2M SDE, Schedule type: Karras, CFG scale: 7, Size: 640x768, Clip skip: 2, Hires upscale: 1.5, Denoising strength: 0.7, Hires steps: 18, Hires upscaler: 1x-ITF-SkinDiffDetail-Lite-v1
I tested a few loras with it and it does alter the appearance a bit too much on most celebrity loras compared to v2.
are you using his negative/positive embeddings? I've had issues with the ZPDXLrl (positive) embedding & celebrity lora's. (can lead to garbled mess).
@SleezeBagDiffusion No, they also change the appearance a bit too much. Of course, most loras will have that effect too. But I try to minimize the effects as much as possible.
@d_A_v_I_d I see what you're saying now.. celebrity LORA's especially. I still think Fast Pony Merge 7.5 specifically (not 9!) is best at handling Razz's celebrity Lora's. Something happened in version 9 that isn't quite as good. I'd suggest trying it if you haven't already!
The V3 is absolutly a nice improvment, it stay flexible, and even seems to have learn things, while having a more realistic feels. you are truly talented in training models keep up the good work ! I will be waiting for your work on SD3 when it will be fully release. Thanks for your work
V3 is truly awesome, but I'm having a lot of issues with watermarks. I've been testing a bunch of Pony models side-by-side, and Everclear definitely produces the most watermarks by far.
Any idea why this is the case / any plans to fix it?
Just by writing (1Boy), he gives me a girl. Too hard to make content with shemale, femboy or trans. Pfff! Many other models are more successful. It's a pity, because this model is good for straight content.
popular not meant best
V2 for male grungy heroes are way better. V3 makes more pretty and often female models even when prompt as male. Bad.
ooooh, that's really too bad. I loooove Zovya, I'm really hoping things will be gender balanced though
I don't even mind if it can generate more female images, it is more of accuracy and cost, now Civitai online gen cost money and no matter how many times I put in male, man, 1man etc the result sometimes give more female. I am liking the realistic look that some of the results come out though.
Anyway to make cum (semen) more realistic? everything realistic but the cum.. it looks like a painting lol.
I like to add a lot of pussy juice, spit, drooling, but it only goes so far.
'Does everything a PonyXL model can' what actually ponyxl can do better than sdxl ?
Various sex positions with any lora, even one with a SFW training set. The best I've seen outside of pony is Juggernaut and it completely fails at NSFW with a SFW trained lora.
It's understanding of NSFW concepts is unparalleled compared to any other models I've found, it also knows lots of obscure anime characters
ah ok thanks
@amazingbeauty also general booru comprehension. Due to some sort of overtraining pony is A LOT more specific.
@Volnovik now i have one new question, what is 'booru comprehension' ? i have no idea what that mean
@amazingbeauty I mean prompt adherence.
@amazingbeauty Specifically, the kinds of prompts you would see on an imageboard site like rule34. Whenever I have trouble getting a prompt to work, I go to rule34 and see if I can find a tag phrased like what I want and try that (e.g. "breast_grab" or "ass shot")
Really enjoy the model. Best realistic pony available. My only complaint is that it doesn't seem to be able to squirt like the base model. Hope you can transfer this functionality to the realistic version you have.
Examples of what the base model can do with loras:
https://civitai.com/images/11448564
Or without:
https://civitai.com/images/6309910
A follow up on this: it seems ((female ejaculation)) works sometimes. Not quite as well as the images I posted but better than what I was getting with prompts involving squirt.
Someone knows a trick to change the face?
In my experiments, face seems to be determined by general descripion and then is quite constant for all images. For example if I ask for a "pale skin, gir with glasses" I will get THAT face.
On SD 1.5 I was used to write "1 girl is Kelly Brooke" (or any other celebrities) and I got a complete change in the face. But on this checkpoint nothing happens... I'm always stuck on the same face.
This is pony. Try names from booru etc.
@Volnovik oh, you mean I should use anime charaters, hoping they look good on this photorealistic checkpoint?
@settima_ai this is a pony finetune. Thats it. Kelly Brooke is not present there (I guess) for better or worse. And it is weird to expect her here. But you can also search for booru tags describing facial features, it can give an interesting result.
@Volnovik where can I find a list?
@settima_ai any booru site like safebooru, danbooru, gelbooru, aibooru etc. Look for tag groups. Also you can use Ranbooru extension for randomising stuff (not for this checkpoint imo). And yeah photorealism is not the feature of this exact model, at least yet. Also I advise you to check Pony and it's authors threads just to understand what it is, why it is and how funny the whole thing of it becoming best anime model so far (in prompt adherence) is.
Same problem. To get different face i forced to completely change the prompt
Use a face swapping website.
@TubbyCakes oh, totally forgot ipadapter with face transfer
@Volnovik Sorry, I cant find danbooru tags for "face geometry", just expressions. Even if, I'm afraid it wont enought to fix a face to a precise result. For example, even with "oval face & big eyes" there are infinte different faces...
Great Model! Thank you a lot!
Do i have to train realistic character Loras for this like i do for regular SDXL or in a special way like for Pony?
I believe it will need to be in the same way as for Pony, but I'm still figuring it out myself.
Does anyone have any tips how to generate dark pictures with little to no lighting? Maybe prompts or even loras that lets me do this?
Also this is the best checkpoint available, bar none.
Concept art darkside lora by https://civitai.com/user/prgfrg23 does it for me. But it looks like he deleted that pack from civitai.
Edit: He did not, but I cannot find it via search for whatever reason: https://civitai.com/models/264290?modelVersionId=446346
Thank you @Volnovik, civitais search function is what it is.
This is the single best model ever conceived so far.
If only Pony could use regular SDXL loras, the world would be perfect.
@SlimeGirl I mean they can theoretically, but as they have been trained on other models the quality will drastically go down usually.
@Maya_H_123 makes sense, thanks. it also explains why I’ve been having so much trouble 🤣
hello. tnx for this, could u please add a lighting 2step version too? we cpu user can get some boost here, thank u
what vae do I use with this model?
it says standard SDXL VAE
Hello, what lora training parameters would you recommend for a real character ?
sincerily
I love it!
I like this, but I find Pony Realism easier to use. YMMV
I would like to explain something ...
only TOP Creators have the possibility to use the civitai-generation service ... all others do not ... BUT that does not mean that these models are the best "by far not"
This was one of the first good realistic models (while retaining the Pony concepts fully), there are better ones now but many used this model for their MERGES.
This checkpoint is TRAINED!
what are you talking about. everclear is one of the best.
@potowax203 which ones are better in your opinion?
sounds like a skill issue, I train loras and generate images on this site, have not spent a penny and I'mm constantly hovering around 500-1000 buzz WITHOUT even trying to get buzz by launching loras or something like that
@bubusauce no i mean that creation-service for users dont have the local hardware ...
Do NOT sleep on the embeddings like i did. zPDXL2 and zPDXL2-neg do wonders.
What are some of your common settings? For me, I love this checkpoint (v3) as is with no embeddings and no loras. But I use Euler (not Euler a), 20 steps, CFG scale somewhere between 10 and 14, (when stretched bodies happen) use a 1:1 aspect ratio often at 1024x1024, and no image quality prompting except for the standard Pony prompts like "score_9, score_8_up, score_7_up" and a negative prompt starting with "score_1, score_2, score_3, score_4, score_5, score_6, tanlines". (That tanlines is a personal preference thing for me. I don't find them visually appealing.)
Although lately, I've been having some good results with DPM++ 2M SDE Karras, 20 steps, CFG scale of 5.
Again, no embeddings or loras. And I get great results.
The only lora that I sometimes use, if I go for closeups on skin is the Goosebump_skin lora at a strenth of 0.6.
⠀⠀Let's compare some PONY models 🦄
⠀⠀⠀⠀🌍 See here my detailed test 🌎
Details
Files
Available On (2 platforms)
Same model published on other platforms. May have additional downloads or version variants.









