Woodland camo BDU, For Krea2, works in base and Turbo. Recommend Kroma0.1 lora (weight 1) with Krea2.

Updated V2. Longer, slower run. Better Quality. Main version Woodland2_1600x2600. safetensors (images redone - compare with V1)

Also added the Woodland2_1000 step version (switch in the dropdown in the download section) it is easier to change nametags and stuff, but quality will be lower and it likely works worse in complex scenes. All else from the og post remains the same:

I only ever use Krea2 and recommend (for uncensored) in combination with Kroma0.1 (Works better for me than 0.2 or 0.3). 0.1 is the Kroma version. The weight is 1.

To be clear: the BDU lora was trained on Krea2 base and should work with all Krea2/turbo and derivates.

I was not interested in Krea2, it is ludicrously censored (not talking nsfw, i'm talking SILLY). But Loadstones Kroma (Who made the legendary Chroma1HD) FULLY decensors Krea2, while keeping loras compatible. I know there are other options, my lora should still work.

All my examples are from a combo of Krea2 Turbo with kroma-v0.1 And Krea2-hd-vae (not the Qwen image vae!)

or kroma-v0.1-rl-mild.safetensors to free the heavily censored krea2. On HF it is lodestones/Kroma.

I intentionally use very complex scenes/prompts to show how well it does even then. Only Boogu Image 0.1 (base+turbo lora!) can rival that. It is nowhere near as sterilized as Krea2 but not uncensored. Got a similar Lora for that too.

Last image in V1 is a version of the first but ran with only krea2-turbo. The prompt is the same!

Look at the second and third (PG13) example's MONSTER of a prompt. Not all details are always correct (nametags) but even when finally overloaded with details, there is ZERO messed up anatomy or other glaring errors.

From Kroma0.2 onwards that good anatomy and prompt adherence diminishes noticeably. That is NOT criticism. Kroma is very much work in progress. But for photorealism Krea2 Kroma0.1 is basically perfect.

Except for the non-mild rl version, that seems fully censored.