I present my attempt to make a male-focused anal cross-section model (since base models are too cervix-focused). I tried to train this to have minimal influence on art style but there's only so much that can be done for that. The model is consistent enough that I'm uploading it as-is (it's definitely more consistent than my detailed version).
V1:
Recommended model strength is 0.6-0.7 to avoid having it overinfluence the generation when combined with additional models (LoRA and LyCORIS).
Main tags:
mp-analcross, internal view, cum inside
I have found that lowering the tag strength on internal view (like internal view: 0.8) can help with duplicate/doubling of the cross-section elements.
None of my training images had the below cum concepts but you may optionally add them to negative prompt if you want the cum to be less messy (it's an Illustrious/booru dataset bias issue, not a LoRA issue):
Negative tags:
ejaculating while penetrated, cum in ass, cum overflowThe settings used for my generation testing were 4-5 CFG, 30 steps, DPM++ 2M SDE - Karras on Forge with an adetailer (face_yolov8s).
Description
V1:
Recommended model strength is 0.6-0.7 to avoid having it overinfluence the generation when combined with additional models (LoRA and LyCORIS).
I have found that lowering the tag strength on internal view (like internal view: 0.8) can help with duplicate/doubling of the cross-section elements.
Comments (3)
Cool! Any plans for a prostate g-spot cross-section, so you can show prostate hitting?
I don't have plans to make a model for that. I can try to experiment with the concept but make no promises on if I'll get far with it.
@linkster123 No worries, was just curious. Thanks for the lora and it looks great!