CivArchive
    Preview 118212052
    Preview 118039393
    Preview 117889302
    Preview 117889159
    Preview 117889254
    Preview 117889309
    Preview 117889360
    Preview 117889465
    Preview 117981971
    Preview 117981983
    Preview 117981985
    Preview 117981882
    Preview 118038719
    Preview 118038724

    v3.3

    I mostly use 30 STEPS EULER CFG 8

    v3.2

    I mostly use 30 STEPS EULER CFG 8

    high_contrast_evo_three

    I mostly use 30 STEPS EULER CFG 6

    dmd2_try_CFG_1

    Another try with DMD2 LoRA this time I try to get something usable at CFG 1 because is the fastest CFG
    Recommended Settings:

    12 STEPS LCM CFG 1 -> this is faster

    12 STEPS LCM CFG 1.1 -> Better quality, slower and a little more unestable

    of course there are prompts that can work well with higher CFGs, each additional tenth can have a big impact in the final result

    In this version I added a new ingredient:
    https://civarchive.com/models/1001945/detail-slider-lora-or-illustrious-xl?modelVersionId=1122976

    high_contrast_evo_two

    This version adds a new ingredient to the merge, the great checkpoint mazina
    https://civarchive.com/models/858810/mazina

    I mainly use Euler CFG 8 with 30 Steps

    high_contrast

    I created a new merge and adjusted the contrast, brightness and saturation using the LoRAs from
    https://civarchive.com/models/1093089

    I mainly use Euler, CFG 8, 30 Steps

    Other interesting option is to use UniPC with CFG 5 as all the images in following post:
    https://civarchive.com/posts/27067545

    Some samples LMS with CFG 5 in this post:
    https://civarchive.com/posts/27078348

    v3.1

    This version is flatter and colorful, for some prompts can be anime or comic like, for others still have some 3D, I mainly use Euler cfg 6.5 and 30 Steps

    second_dmd2_try

    This second try with DMD2 lora is more conventional, first one was too overcharged

    Settings:
    Sampler lcm

    cfg 1-2, 1.4 and 1.5 work well for most of the prompts

    Recomended steps 8-12

    first_try_dmd2
    It is a version with DMD2 lora https://civarchive.com/models/1608870?modelVersionId=1820705
    Settings:
    Sampler lcm

    cfg 1-2, 1.5 works well for most of the prompts, higher cfg produces brighter vivid colors, lower cfg is darker and more realist, in the showcase most of the images are with cfg 1.5 but few were cfg=1

    Recomended steps 8-12

    v2.9.5

    Based in v2.9

    More consistent and less 3D/realist than v2.9

    v3.0

    After the radical version v2.9, I wanted something less radical, this v3.0 is based v2.6_spo I added more 3D and realism but less than in v2.9, I think v3.0 is more versatil

    I usually use 30 steps Euler with CFG 8, but for some prompts it is interesting to use CFG 16
    Examples with CFG 16 are the image
    https://civarchive.com/images/121192208
    and the post

    https://civarchive.com/posts/26627157

    v2.9
    Based in v2.8_spo I added more 3D and realism keeping still colorful

    v2.8_spo
    Merge of v2.8 with SPO-SDXL_4k-p_10ep_LoRA_webui

    v2.6_spo
    Merge of v2.6_alternative_clip with the great lora SPO-SDXL_4k-p_10ep_LoRA_webui
    https://civarchive.com/models/510261?modelVersionId=567119

    V2.6_alternative_clip
    is v2.6 with a different clip that I have picked from
    https://civarchive.com/models/2099347?modelVersionId=2569166

    V2.8

    More vibrant colors and a little more flatter

    V2.7.5
    based in V2.7 has more color saturation and contrast


    V2.7
    A new merge based on V2.6


    The version trying_semi_realistic:
    It is my first attempt of making a semi realistic version, it has a known issue that it tends to add a logo or gibberish url watermark in one or both bottom corners

    V2.6 adds an additional pinch of realism and 3D on top of V2.5

    V2.5 I added a pinch of 3D and realism to V2

    New version V2, has same ingredients as the first version but merged different. It has less saturation and more details for most of the prompts.


    I have not experience in creation of models, I took some of the models that I usually use in my workflow and merged them.

    In case this produces any good output all the praise for the authors of the models that I used in this merge:

    Project Pygmalion :

    https://civarchive.com/models/2174541?modelVersionId=2583589

    XXX-Comics:

    https://civarchive.com/models/2278763?modelVersionId=2564763

    Palladium:

    https://civarchive.com/models/2082479?modelVersionId=2399153

    Kurves:

    https://civarchive.com/models/2115884?modelVersionId=2479552

    Artaix Realism

    https://civarchive.com/models/2197692?modelVersionId=2568346

    AURALIS | Illustrious

    https://civarchive.com/models/2121653/auralis-or-illustrious?modelVersionId=2562369

    Description

    I added a pinch of 3d and realism on top of v2

    FAQ

    Comments (5)

    antarekJan 18, 2026· 1 reaction
    CivitAI

    This is a really interesting checkpoint, thanks for it.
    On a side note, i was looking at your prompts and couldn't help but notice that you use tons of tags that aren't Danbooru ones in your neg prompt. Also your showcased pics use prompts build upon natural language. Illustrious isn't good when it comes to natural language if you aim for accuracy regarding the content that you generate. Sure it ll render pics but it's the same as flipping a coin hoping it lands on the side you bet on: not accurate and build upon luck. For accuracy ILXL checkpoints needs Danbooru tags because it has been build upon it. The sole exception to this rule is for trained checkpoints that can have been trained on extra tag. But your checkpoint isn't trained, this is a merge. So unless you ve merged checkpoints that are trained ones AND that you know all of the extra tags they have been trained on, i struggle to see the interest in using tags that aren't Danbooru ones. Sure the resulting image is different from the one you would get without those "custom tags" but this isn't the result of the parser understanding the tag but just the result of the change in your prompt token weight. Just my 2 cents, tho.

    aj_prime8517
    Author
    Jan 18, 2026· 2 reactions

    Thanks for your comment, for the checkpoint the merit is for the ingredients used.

    Regarding the images as I am not very creative I like the randomness to compensate that a little :-).

    hana_moJan 19, 2026· 1 reaction

    Recent high-quality models seem to have less output diversity than older models.

    The instability of output due to natural language prompts somewhat compensates for this shortcoming.
    At least, that's my opinion :-).

    antarekJan 19, 2026

    @aj_prime8517 Ultimately, the important thing is to get pics that you or the people you're generating them for appreciate. However, my comment regarding the use of non Danbooru tags (that aren't tags at all in fact) remains valid regarding their impact on generated pics.😜👍

    LetTheBassDropFeb 3, 2026· 1 reaction

    I've had great success with using natural language. I think this depends a lot of sampler, clip, and scheduler and the other components of the workflow.

    Checkpoint
    Illustrious

    Details

    Downloads
    87
    Platform
    CivitAI
    Platform Status
    Available
    Created
    1/18/2026
    Updated
    5/7/2026
    Deleted
    -

    Files

    probaExperimentMerge_v25.safetensors

    Mirrors

    Available On (1 platform)

    Same model published on other platforms. May have additional downloads or version variants.