CivArchive
    toonListiC! - v1.0
    NSFW
    Preview 107038999
    Preview 107037834
    Preview 107037836
    Preview 107042533
    Preview 107041953
    Preview 107038998
    Preview 107037835
    Preview 107040773
    Preview 107040771
    Preview 107041952
    Preview 107040772
    Preview 107041951
    Preview 107044200
    Preview 107044273

    Toonlistic!

    This model is designed to create vibrant, colorful images with bold, dynamic outlines. You don't need to use "toon" or "comic" in your prompt—the style is baked right in!

    The outlines are a key feature and will vary between dark, inky lines and colored lines that blend with the art, giving everything a high-energy, illustrated feel.

    Strengths

    Due to its bright colors and training (it's slightly curated with LoRAs for better backgrounds), this model is good for:

    • Scenery & Compositions

    • Action Scenes & Fights

    • Vibrant Character Portraits

    Here are the settings I use to get the best results:

    • CFG Scale: 3.5

    • Steps: 30 - 50

    • Sampler: Res_Multistep + Beta

    Prompting Advice

    The model is very flexible. It can handle detailed prompts if you want a specific scene.

    However, I've found that basic, straightforward prompts often look best. This approach lets the model's core style shine through, creating a cleaner, more minimal look that really suits it. Feel free to experiment and find what you like!

    The model works great at many resolutions. Here are the ones I've tested and recommend:

    • 1024 x 1024

    • 1152 x 896

    • 896 x 1152

    • 1216 x 832

    • 832 x 1216 (I find this to be the most efficient)

    • 1344 x 768

    • 768 x 1344

    • 1536 x 640

    • 640 x 1536


    I hope you enjoy Toonlistic!
    Recommendations, and overall critique is welcome, even if it's negative. Just remember, I generate these merges for fun, and share them here without any actual incentives, only pure satisfaction from seeing what others make/generate. I always spend lots of my time working/curating to make specific styles that a normal lora might not be able to achieve. I am also terrible at lora training since I can't train locally, and here my models always fail to capture what I envision.

    Description

    Part of my merge is always under the suggested resources section

    FAQ

    Comments (13)

    FatbunsOct 22, 2025
    CivitAI

    It doesn't like to play well with loras - You have likely put it on illustrious instead of Pony, considering that you have used pony tags and pony embeddings

    JetlistiC
    Author
    Oct 22, 2025· 1 reaction

    My model is a merge of Illustrious checkpoints. The Illustrious model, along with Pony and Noobai, all belong to a new "family" of models.

    ​Family 1: Standard SDXL 1.0 (e.g., Base SDXL, Juggernaut, RealVis)

    ​Uses descriptive, natural language prompts.

    ​Family 2: Pony/Illustrious/Noobai (e.g., Pony Diffusion V6, Illustrious, Noobai)

    ​These are not simple fine-tunes. They are heavily modified forks of SDXL.

    ​They were all trained on a dataset using Danbooru tags.

    ​This means they require "magic" or "quality" tags like score_9, score_8_up, masterpiece to get high-quality images.

    ​So, listing it with "Pony tags" is the correct way to use this model. The tags are not op tional.

    JetlistiC
    Author
    Oct 22, 2025

    What Loras did you have trouble with?

    JetlistiC
    Author
    Oct 22, 2025

    Just to make sure I will test various Loras once I get home, but thanks for the feedback, let me know what Loras you had problems with if you're able to, so I can test them as well. 

    FatbunsOct 22, 2025

    No. Do not associate Pony with Illustrious. They're trained very differently.

    Score_X is purely limited to Pony models.

    JetlistiC
    Author
    Oct 23, 2025

    @Fatbuns The score_9, score_8 tags are part of a node in my workflow, I left them on along with masterpiece and illustrious quality tags (I was unaware of score_x being solely based on Pony)
    But I find it odd that you're making the conclusion that the model is pony solely because of the prompt? You have not told me what lora you had problems with? The loras I used to achieve the baked style where all illustrious. The models in the merge are all illustrious, NeroMatura, Waillustrious, amanatsu, and the rest of the iterations are all illustrious, I don't have a single pony checkpoint in my nvme.

    FatbunsOct 23, 2025

    There is no use discussing this with you.

    First you claim that SDXL uses 'Descriptive Natural language' - it does not, you can google it, ask gpt, ask anyone.

    Then you claim pony and illustrious are a family - they are not, you can google it, ask gpt, ask anyone.

    "listing it with "Pony tags" is the correct way to use this model. The tags are not op tional"

    Back-to-back-to-back, wrong every time, if it's truly an illustrious model.

    Pick any of VelvetS' loras for illustrious.

    JetlistiC
    Author
    Oct 23, 2025

    @Fatbuns I am not an expert, that's why I am asking, my only point is on you saying this model is pony which is not possible.

    The other aspects of your claim I concede that I am wrong but solely on the claim this model is pony in that regard they don't change that.

    I am not arguing to be right, like I said I am not an expert I've posted this in various of my models, I've even stated I am not good at making Loras, I am constantly testing and trying things on my workflow. I am always open and constantly reading slowly the things that I need, it's a lot of information and I try to grasp as much as I can, I've only been deep diving on this area of AI for barely 5 months.

    Your sheer imperiousness is what annoyed me. As some one who has Neuroticism and is high on agreeableness, I never argue in bad faith, I simply hate arrogant despots who want to belittle for the sake of their own ego.

    There's quite a few arrogant and highly entitled people here on civitai, and it's understood to some extent, but getting random DMs and negative feedback with no leeway, getting no feedback to work with just straight up "I am better than you" type of stuff, while being impossible to please the need, it gets tiring.

    I am not here to compete with anyone I just share what I like and what I make while I learn in the process. I don't see what you're discussing or arguing about since I already told you the models used for the merge are all illustrious, I don't have a single pony model in my drive, yet you are still stuck on stating this model is pony.

    Unless Wai's or the other models are wrongly listed then yes, but none have the pony listing, nor do pony Loras work with them, I've tried a few older pony Loras and they all came out baked or blacked out.

    So I don't see what your goal is?

    This model is not pony.

    LatteLeopardOct 27, 2025

    Its 99% not pony. but how did you mix pony with SDXL or Illustrious. Pony has a totally different text encoder? Did you just use train difference or DARE with putting pony's Text encoder(base) at 0?

    Merging Pony & Illustrious is an complex process and usually the end result is not worth it.

    but im curious to know how you merged "family 2"

    JetlistiC
    Author
    Oct 27, 2025

    @LatteLeopard I only had the 'score_9' tags on the prompt off scene composer node in comfyui, they where just ignored by the model since regenerating without them didn't change anything. I don't know where Fatbuns got that the model was pony only based of a simple prompt tag. Invalid words in a prompt don't affect the model as a lora would.
    Even if the embeddings are pony it doesn't matter.

    Model Architecture vs. Inputs: My base model 'illustrious' checkpoint. This is the core architecture. Prompts and embeddings are inputs to that architecture. They do not, and cannot, change the model file.

    LoRA vs. Embedding: If it was a pony LoRA, which does inject new weights into the U-Net then YES, but I did not use one. An Embedding (Textual Inversion) only manipulates the text encoder's existing weights. It adds no new data.
    Prompt Tags: score_9 is a tag from the Pony training dataset. On a non-Pony model, it has zero function.

    I was unaware of those tags since I don't even use Pony, so I just left them on the prompt composer when making the back images, all it did was get ignored, since I also had the Masterpiece tag.

    JetlistiC
    Author
    Oct 27, 2025

    @LatteLeopard my first response was directly off gemini, I took my time and read more, so that response was incorrect, what I meant to say was that they are based off stable diffusion, they are different architectures as you stated, I have attempted to merge NoobAI with illustrious in comfyui but it doesn't turn out very well, I realized the reason now xD

    JetlistiC
    Author
    Oct 27, 2025

    @LatteLeopard Interesting enough this model
    https://civitai.com/models/1902466?modelVersionId=2153424

    Has a Pony lora highly baked in for the overall style I don't know how it worked xD

    LatteLeopardOct 28, 2025

    @JetlistiC NoobAI is easy to merge with Illustrious. As NoobAI is a contiuation of training data off illustrious. Like Hassaku or Rou Wei. Pony is like a totally different architechture as you stated. If you try to merge a pony model with Noob Or ILX it gives an error because the UNET is different.

    The only way you can reallly attempt this merge is with a crazy complicated setup using DARE-TIES or Train Difference.

    The other way is to generate a bunch of images with the pony model, create a lora, then merge the lora into to illustrious model.

    If you the first way im curious how you filled in the gap between the UNET blocks?
    Its very impressive.

    Checkpoint
    Illustrious

    Details

    Downloads
    159
    Platform
    CivitAI
    Platform Status
    Available
    Created
    10/21/2025
    Updated
    5/13/2026
    Deleted
    -

    Files

    toonlistic_v10.safetensors

    Mirrors

    CivitAI (1 mirrors)

    Available On (1 platform)

    Same model published on other platforms. May have additional downloads or version variants.