illustrious Whitney
Lora type: Illustrious
trigger：ilwhitney,
example:
ilwhitney, 1girl, breasts, dark-skinned male, nipples, interracial, grabbing, dark skin, grabbing another's breast, cum, 1boy, hetero, nude, sex, pink hair, cum in pussy, penis, open mouth, smile, hair ornament, completely nude, blush, grabbing from behind, twintails, cum overflow, teeth, on side, large breasts, hairclip, faceless, pink eyes, indoors, faceless male, on bed, sweat, lying, tongue, window, vaginal<lora:illustrious Whitney 768x1152:1>,
Negative prompt: ugly, sketch, monochrome, greyscale, car, logo, letter, signature, logo, text, patreon logo, letters, name tag, patreon username,
Steps: 30, Sampler: Euler a, Schedule type: Automatic, CFG scale: 7, Seed: 2872562470, Size: 768x1152, Model hash: 34db303f74, Denoising strength: 0.35, Clip skip: 2, ENSD: 31337, RNG: NV, Hires upscale: 1.4, Hires upscaler: 4x-UltraSharp, Lora hashes: "illustrious Whitney 768x1152: 7ebd0928597f", Version: v1.10.1
Description
FAQ
Comments (1)
Got 2 things to say:
1) Love the LoRA. Great detail and quite aesthetically pleasing.
2) I dislike that there is literally no info who or what you're trying to recreate. Is it an OC or an existing character?
Why should you bother? Well, I for one don't like going on the net and being a detective, trying to figure out where the character is from. Seeing as you are the creator of it, you have a dataset and as such know the exact name and source that it is from. If it is an OC, tag it as such.
Can't be so hard to write "Whitney from Pokemon", can it?
Also, this isn't me giving grief or complaining, just noting the fact that you're not the only lora tinkerer on the net that does this mistake.
Take it as feedback, constructive even.