SDXL Version by request, trigger: clear_note
Examples with prompts in showcase all with sampler Uni PC BH2 with SGM Uniform scheduler at strength 1.
I trained this one like cheats.safetensors, so you can also not use a trigger word and use it as a general enhancer as well, trigger word is:
clear_note
To get a more pronounced generalized effect:
clear_note with subtle film-grain texture, vintage atmosphere, and light rays
To get the light outline effect:
clear_note with intricate overlay of luminous radiant white line art emphasizing the subject by tracing the detail on their figure,
Style of the former funniest person on Civitai:
Before being being dethroned by UnstableGen
so badly that they were banished to the shadow realm:
Description
FAQ
Comments (37)
LETS FUCKING GOOOOO BABY!!!!!
this dude used to hide all his prompts. Now there is a whole LoRA just to rip all his unique style
I really liked his images, and now that he's banned it's confirmed he was doing something fishy to boost his own posts, which is a shame because the stuff he made could have stood on its own. While I think it's better to share generation data, I also believe people are entitled to not. I suspect that he was using Midjourney to generate his images, but that's just a guess because I've never used it myself.
that user used mostly MJ, and marked all images as Flux
@MarieGem pos move. i tried so many loras to try and recreate those pictures for myself.
MarieGem Is this why he got banned??
6vidit9 stated reason is for leaderboard manipulation, there is a screenshot in the description, and a link to the profile showing the same
schmede Damn, I wish they’d at least showcase the images—those wallpapers are so good! I’ve used them on my phone, and they look incredible on an OLED screen, lol.
@schmede https://civitai.com/user/Hakugin he is making a come back under a different username
@MarieGem yeah i noticed that early on and commented on his picture from my main acc, he blocked me
@snakeLadder6969 bans are given for a reason.... i guess the banned dudes can just open new accounts and block the naysayers ;)
LUL :D
I think I'm slowly getting there.
Nice lora
I must admit that I have conflicting feelings about this lora. I know Clear_Note made a mistake, but his/her pics are amazing. I don't know if it's an homage or just, s/he's not here, s/he can't defend himself, I'll use his style. Schmede, I respect you, I like your youthful Passion for the cause. But maybe you should have phrased it better in your description. Or is there something going on behind the scenes here at Civitai that I have no idea about?
I liked clear_note's art, and we will not see any new art by them anymore due to their own actions. I always thought it was funny that they were at the top of the leaderboard for comedians because the posts were clearly not meant to be funny at all. I strongly disapprove of cheating, having spent a lot of time playing video games, but this far more an homage to their art, naming the lora after them as well as making the trigger word their username. I think making a joke about how they were the number 1 comedian (which they were for a long time) is fair game, considering it's confirmed that they cheated their way there and took away that spot from people that were trying fairly for months. Other than the disapproval for the cheating on leaderboards, I have no ill will. I would have rather they didn't do that because I would rather see more art from them.
Wait what happened?, i am so clueless on the updates
@lightyagami_ this is a style of a user that was recently banned for leaderboard manipulation, but made art that many people liked, which makes the offense all the more a shame. My description jokingly attributed their notoriety to be number #1 on the comedian leaderboards (which they were for a long time) which was a side effect of just the amount of reactions on their posts, when none of their posts were intended to be funny at all. Robotka seems to think that may be in poor taste, which I respect, but I think making that joke is fair game considering they have been adjudicated. I actually liked their art, I would not have made this lora if they were not banned and no longer able to post any more.
@schmede Yeah i know them , never knew they got banned. damn
@schmede Fair comment from @Robotka, fair answer from you. Clear_note's art was definitely unique, but fuck cheaters. Let's not forget that is partly what led Roxin282 to leave. Roxin (and others who left, like @ArtifyAI) did more for user engagement than Clear_note ever did (and he did encourage others with buzz tips). Too little too late from CivitAI...
@junkyard001 thank you, appreciate all in this thread having such a civil discussion 😘
@schmede Thank you for your reply. Yes clear_note is a cheater. I just think it's a double punishment. It's just my opinion. Since I work on the collection daily, I see how many people have left Civitai. But it's definitely not just the cheaters fault. Why are there so few responses to a good picture?
@Robotka i often comment on images I find exceptional, we can be the change we wish to see. 😘
@schmede I know you're active. It was meant to be for everyone. Just a smiley face if you like the picture. Some people won't even do that.
80% of C_N's images were MJ, it ticked me badly that they were marked as flux
@MarieGem that's what I suspected, but wasn't able to be certain since I never used Midjourney
@schmede I have a sub there, but I would never mark my images as Flux if they were MJ. this is also cheating, open source models ran locally are not equally capable as paid models behind expensive GPUs. that person had some images generated by Flux but the vast majority was MJ
MarieGem I had a feeling they were. It was just way too photorealistic for it to be flux which is something midjourney does well
Azuki900 for me the giveaway were very fluid poses, flux characters are more stiff and the images often lack dynamism that MJ provides
MarieGem Couldn't have said it better myself
@Robotka I don't comment a lot but always give a thumbs up or a heart if I love it.
I do like receiving (rare) comments myself, but are they more valuable in some way than an upvote? I mean I probably wouldn't have to much to say other than "wow, nice pic."
@axlaim I also do not like to comment because English is not my language. But every day i give 👍 and ❤️.
@Robotka so someone requested me to do a qwen version of this, did i continue doing that? im pretty scared rg, i don't want to be banned.
@luisa_pinguin Clear_Note is back. His/her nickname is @Hakugin Hakugin has to decide.
I'd really admired Clear_Note's art, because some of their creations were really unique (especially the ones that didn’t rely on an “intricate overly of luminous radiant white line art emphasizing the subject by tracing the detail on their figure,” which @schmede provided a perfect description of). I’d time to comment thoughtfully, compliment and engage with several of the images I found most interesting (like the quilted realism series of images), and tried to bring the attention of prominent Collection Curators (like @TurinBjorn) to those images. So, like @Robotka I have mixed feelings (though not about the LoRA of the joke). In the end I guess none of that changes (unless I find out there was no human agent at all behind Clear_Note). Death of the artist, and all that. And there’s no a priori reason it can’t be true that:
a) Clear_Note made cool images,
b) systematic manipulation of leaderboards (which they did) gets you banned,
c) @schmede is a really funny dude, with a lot of influence on this platform, who decided to build a gibbet to warn cheaters, and
d) this LoRA is BOTH a gag and a tribute, which, in a positive luminous radiant white light, means that the Note rings Clear now that their final bell has tolled.
Thank you, you are correct, it is both a gag and a tribute, I like their art and it is a shame they decided to do cheat the system. While they would not have gotten as much attention without it, I think that they still would have been popular just on the merit of their images. Such a shame. I was always going to clearly attribute the style to the user, and would have to acknowledge who they are. I think the way I did it comes off as less malicious than if I were to state who they were in a matter-of-fact way. It is stilly clearly at their expense, but I think it's very mild (and fair game), considering that.
@schmede totally fair game. This platform can tolerate a wide range of obscenities (which is something I think most of its users like about it, at least in principle) and your post here falls within the conservative region of that range. Don't second guess it.
Awesome, Lora, man and thank you so much. Sonara Clear_Note, you were the biggest winner that time on the leaderboard rank and now the biggest loser for getting banned.
LOL You are The Best Comedian out there ! You really deserve to be best Comedian in the Leaderboard with you funny ultra high quality images to ... and follow Clear Note ;)