A CHECKPOINT THAT ISN'T BLACK MAGIC?! NO! THIS. IS. ALCHEMY!
Quality Tags: masterpiece, best quality, newest,
Negative Tags: (bad quality:1.15), (worst quality:1.3)
Please use both for best results.
PINK ALCHEMY ANIMA LIVES HERE:
https://civarchive.com/models/2578175/ramthrusts-nsfw-pink-alchemy-anima
https://civarchive.com/models/2578175/ramthrusts-nsfw-pink-alchemy-anima
https://civarchive.com/models/2578175/ramthrusts-nsfw-pink-alchemy-anima
STOP USING THE P3, USE THE REAL ONE HERE https://civarchive.com/models/2578175/ramthrusts-nsfw-pink-alchemy-anima
Welcome to Pink Alchemy. My goal here was to get away from the flat-art style to make a semi-real anime mix without that gross muddy / vinyl / plastic look. I think this model captures my vision. The details are crisp, the eyes are clear, the textures have just the right amount of sharpness. Please enjoy and if you have any questions seek me out in the Civitai Discord! Just ask for RAMTHRUST and someone will point you in the right direction.
It's illustrious so follow their instructions and TOS. As far as merge info, It's all in the metadata. Welcome to AI in 2025.
4.8-5.8 CFG - Euler Beta is my choice but mess around with it and you're sure to find something good.
YOU are responsible for outputs as always!
If you've read this far, I have a secret to share. There is no such thing as an NSFW illustrious checkpoint. They're ALL NSFW, really.
Description
Less colorful
Dramatically improved clarity and prompt adherence.
Much better clothing textures
Probably my best model yet!
FAQ
Comments (25)
very nice ,beautiful model !
Love this checkpoint, and the Illustrious BlackMagic as well! keep up the good work!
Thanks dude!
HIT THE GREEN 👍 IF YOU LIKEY!
Great merge! Loving the details it provides.
@johnnys365 Thanks! I really appreciate it!
This is a really great checkpoint. Not only does it have high fidelity, but it also has rich color expression and creativity. If you've used the NTR MIX XIII, you'll love this model.
Thanks for the kind words!
Erry noice :)
Man, this is great!!
Hey, Your stuff is really nice and thank you for the comment here, I really appreciate it!
@RAMTHRUST Thanks! this checkpoint is my favourite now , keep the good work!
very good！
Thank you, I appreciate the kind words!
Best generator for NSFW by far
Woaw man you really nailed it, so far the only great Illustrious for a nice mix of 2D artstyle and 3D "kinda" aspect i loved was "NovaAnime3DXL" (not too much 3D, not too much flat, and still stylized), but your model is also insane in quality and specialy Background !
Nicely detailed background capturing a pretty atmosphere is really hard with SDXL models, so now i'm going to use both of those, its a really nice addition.
I'm curious, was kind of references/art style did you got mostly for this nice aspect and background ?
Hey, thanks a ton for the love! Honestly, there wasn’t one single reference pool I pulled from—I mostly mashed together a bunch of loose inspirations in my head and let the vibes run wild. Glad the model works for you and thank you for the kind words!
@RAMTHRUST I've be running it since a good week (few hundred of renders) and the backgrounds qualities are amazing for wallpapers. Most models seems to favor portrait rather than wide landscapes views. I have sometimes some double heads/triple legs issues (i don't have with others illustrious models with the same prompt/negs), but the overall quality is really great, and the art style it pretty neat.
Do you have plan on iterating such versions or are you mostly trying various ones for more divers styles ?
@bakudankun Both! I just released 3 new checkpoints, including Pink Alchemy 1.69! The goal was to make everything less shiny. I'll continue to iterate on my illustrious and noob models for the foreseeable future, but merges take time.
@RAMTHRUST Ho great i just checked today, i will be able to see the changes after a few hundred new generations to compare both.
Basically you tweak the base references for each new merge, like removing some shiny pictures for this one ? Because i guess you keep the same base dataset overall no ?
Or its more "merging" new models with your merge and removing the less good ones ?
@bakudankun If you're interested, I have a discord where you can pick the minds of a good deal of people who have tons of SD knowledge. They're a really down-to-earth group and everyone has a good time.
But to answer, I got lucky in that one of the models I merged acknowledged this already as an issue and corrected exactly that. So I went back to version 1.1, swapped the v1 for v2, re-merged and get what you see here. Usually I add more to each merge but it's tough to make changes everyone will like. Along that vein, I kept the changes absolutely minnimal for v 1.69 (lol 69).
Consider joining the discord. No pressure, just good times.
Details
Available On (1 platform)
Same model published on other platforms. May have additional downloads or version variants.