CivArchive

    ltx23 - i2v 1.1

    Slower but better audio and hip movement , use at 0.8-1.0

    ltx23 - i2v 1.0

    Same as previous ones , use at 0.9 or less to have speech

    Audio doesn't always sync up

    ltx2 - i2v 1.1

    Higher rank and resolution , less jittering , with audio.

    Use : fast slow from below from behind held in arms missionary pov riding on top

    lying down side view

    ltx2 - i2v

    Use at 1.0 str , or 0.8-0.9 if you want video to follow the text prompt better

    Add scene description and script "like this"

    Wan2.2 - I2V bulge HIGH
    Use at 1.0 str , or 0.6-0.8 if you want video to follow the text prompt better

    If it's too slow sample more frames in High , speed up to lower count , sample Low.
    Example 81 high > 65 low

    1.1 - 720p version , I2V bulge , with no mixing
    Best at 0.7-0.8 str , add other loras for better effect
    Around 3100 steps
    Same prompt below


    1.0 - 480p version , I2V bulge , mix test
    https://civarchive.com/models/1331682/wan-pov-missionary?modelVersionId=1623136

    Mixed at different proportions to add motion that was lacking
    Also tried merging at higher proportion so this lora is too strong at 1.0 in most cases
    Doesn't always sync , try different prompts/settings
    Trained on 15 videos 48 frames each , 512x512 , around 3800 steps

    Settings used:

    lora str - 0.4 - 0.7
    frames - 49
    steps - 10
    cfg - 6.0
    shift - 5.0


    Promt:
    st0mach ,she is getting fucked , missionary position, pov , stomach is bulging with each thrust,with her legs spread having sex with a man.A man is thrusting his penis back and forth

    Description

    FAQ

    Comments (21)

    RemielNov 20, 2025· 2 reactions
    CivitAI

    Thank you! 😘 I've been waiting for a Wan2.2 version for a long time. Are you still using those same 15 videos or did you expand the dataset?

    blo01
    Author
    Nov 20, 2025· 2 reactions

    Ty ,
    Partially , some didn't fit the style I think . Was too slow/fast etc , this is a bit experimental and has different style to it . Tried also speeding it up but that made clips shorter but it should be more responsive. (maybe)

    tldr 50/50 synthetic to get similar dataset.

    RemielNov 21, 2025· 1 reaction

    @blo01 So how large of a dataset did you use in the end? What type of clips are in the dataset, style wise, 3d renders? Anime? I am asking because I noticed the anime faces of my girls improving when your lora is added to the mix and I am wondering what could have caused it, so that I can include this magic fix in my own lora.

    blo01
    Author
    Nov 21, 2025· 2 reactions

    @Remiel 3d/2.5d mostly , 33 clips , it gets less blurry if you get to 0.04-0.05 loss , otherwise idk

    RemielNov 21, 2025· 1 reaction

    @blo01 Thanks for the info. 👍

    RemielNov 21, 2025· 2 reactions
    CivitAI

    I don't know if its just me, but in doggystyle images, instead of the kneeling girl getting a stomach bulge, I am getting a pair of balls to appear under the girl out of nowhere, and the guy with a stomach bulge 😂 Maybe the dataset is lacking doggystyle? Or maybe captions are not clear enough in who is supposed to have their belly bulge? 🤔

    blo01
    Author
    Nov 21, 2025· 2 reactions

    dataset does lack doggy pose yeah...
    so it might add unexpected parts if desired parts are not visible

    hboxgames132Nov 23, 2025· 4 reactions
    CivitAI

    Now I'll go catch some fairies

    MorlanaOneNov 25, 2025· 1 reaction
    CivitAI

    I really wanted to like this, but the 2.2 LoRA exaggerates the bulge way too much and also seems to affect the original image (ie changing face, losing details). The 2.1 LoRA is still the GOAT from my testing.

    blo01
    Author
    Nov 26, 2025· 1 reaction

    2.1 didn't work that well sometimes , I might have overdone it

    MorlanaOneNov 26, 2025· 1 reaction

    @blo01 The only downside with the 2.1 version is that it slows down the movement too much.

    Basically, your 2.2 version has excellent motion but overdoes the bulge and changes facial expression in my experience (the dreaded blank anime stare), while your 2.1 version maintains consistency from the original image and has great motion with the downside of overall slower motion.

    seedilyNov 27, 2025· 1 reaction
    CivitAI

    wan2.2 version is working really well, thank you for this!

    I'm getting great results in a FF/LF workflow, both high/low loras set to 0.7 strength, and with a stomach bulge already present in both images

    Cyberai99Nov 28, 2025· 9 reactions
    CivitAI

    ever thought about a throat bulge lora?

    gugu_greaDec 2, 2025· 2 reactions
    CivitAI

    (wan2.2) Great lora,bulge is really good, works most of the time..

    but it will make penis and pussy too soft and wobbling sometimes, will mess up penetration.

    helloshitDec 4, 2025· 3 reactions
    CivitAI

    idk why the wan2.2 lora always B-ulge the PenS not stomach.

    dagabagoolDec 9, 2025· 1 reaction
    CivitAI

    it is almost perfect. couple of things: if the p--is or the b-lge is too big, the b-lge ends up just doing a slight woggle so maybe for v2, find some videos for those extra large sizes? (videos from animators like de-pstr-ke and Big green come to mind) also wish we could increase the b-lge size with some sort of setting/prompt

    rollerinotDec 12, 2025· 1 reaction
    CivitAI

    I've finished testing this with several animation (posts coming today and tomorrow) and my thoughts are:
    it needs a good prompt
    it needs to be so much weighted than the other loras on the mix to work and that makes:
    The non-bulge movement result is similar to what you get with just a base model (sex position/movement loras are almost doing nothing).
    for a V2 version I would try to make it work with lower weights and isolate the bulge movement to make the rest of the scene to be affected by other sex position loras.
    Nice job anyway :)

    gambikules858Dec 16, 2025· 1 reaction
    CivitAI

    v2 is good.

    ZannarkJan 2, 2026· 4 reactions
    CivitAI

    plan lora compatible dragon?

    blo01
    Author
    Jan 2, 2026· 1 reaction

    what do you mean ? this one doesn't work ?

    ZannarkJan 2, 2026· 1 reaction

    @blo01 mean lora dragon x dragoness sex