Recommended strength: .45-.8
This can give you a variety of outcomes. You could come out as a human with nano technology, or a full on cyborg, or something in between. Please see the sample images for an idea.
The results can also vary depending on the Lora used with it. Before you brush off a more robotic result, look closely at the facial features. It will often make them match the character lora you input, if you were to input one.
If you have a Lora of yourself, this is a good one to try it with. For female cyborgs, please see the recommended resources below.
Oh, and this should work just fine with anime/illustrative Pony's.
Description
FAQ
Comments (7)
These all look masculine. Anyone have luck generating female or feminine characters?
I linked a model for a female cyborg to use separately, or in conjunction with this one.
Curious if you tried making females with the male one? I'd imagine it'd still work cuz of how female heavy most of the models are, but I haven't tried.
It should produce women, because the original was meant to be unisex. When someone stated they were struggling to produce a female cyborg, I produced a female Lora just by removing all the male images from the dataset.
@Voy969 I call bs on that, how bad does your captioning have to be to struggle to make female images. That or they were using a gay model without knowing it. But for the record, if anyone makes that complaint again, tell em to try a different model. Cuz I know from experience that there's some models that specifically refuse to produce male outputs.
Also suggest the terms 'anatomy', and 'beautiful' in the prompts. If you can use both those words in the prompts while using the Juggernaut model, and not get female outputs or actually end up with male outputs, then idk, at that point you need to go find god or something, maybe punch him in the nuts for trolling you so hard 🤣.
@Lazman I appreciate the suggestions. Thank you
looks cool, I'll giver a shot.