yLora You're welcome! I am actually currently trying it with even more animals and it still surprises me how well it does for some of these. I tried "Eel" expecting it to fail utterly but it worked very well!

It does seem to struggle a fair amount with aquatic creatures though and even with heavy emphasised "No arms, no legs" they still sometimes slip through, sometimes often.

Also as mentioned in my main comment, did you have any suggestions on how to best do duos that dont involve sex? Any magic words for the prompt perhaps? Because unfortunately so far i've been unsuccessful.

Also Also, if you'd like i can try and pick the best ones out from the ones ive tested and post them here?

yLora RIght gotcha. I'll try adding "safe" to the prompt and do some more fiddling and i'll get back to you on that once i go back to try doing some duos.

And yea i will admit the aquatic animals side is certainly very hit or miss. Attempting shark or Dolphin for example, will usually not be as good as first off, it will very much try to give them arms and legs even with heavily emphasised "No arms, No legs" in the prompt and negative but with enough playing around i did get a few lucky generations that lacked "armlike" fins and flippers. One problem though is that even with things like sharks and dolphins (and even some land animals) they always have a "human" head shape. Most notably, there is a visible neck.
I dont think any of those are good enough to post but i WILL post the best one of the bunch for the "Eel" after i post this comment (and the best dolphin even if i dont think its quite that amazing, if only just to show how the visible neck makes it not quite work). I also had a few good snakes as well. Right now, im experienting with various Pokemon as i noticed in the metadata of the lora that pokemon was mentioned.

Birds also worked to an extent as well but i have to heavily empasise no arms, and even then a good 70% of those images came out with three or 4 legs, some even leaning more towards Gryphons or Hippogryphs.

A updated version would certainly be good! Because even if only 60 images were used for training, it seems pretty good at what it does already! But yes as you say, even animals that typically would stand on two legs like Kangaroos or T-Rex's, is a bit tricky to do. Not impossible, but certainly it doesn't lean that way. While im mentioning it i should also mention that scale can sometimes be off with things like Horses and dinosaurs (Too small, generally) or Squirrels and mice (Too big, generally) and needs some rather creative prompting to try and get the scale right with mixed results but again, it still DOES it! So these are mostly minor gripes.

Once i've done testing i'll see about cherrypicking some good ones from other animals to post aswell. I've had some good giraffes (Which at first didnt do too good but eventually worked with lots of "long neck" tags and such), Koalas, Dragons (which i've already posted), and a few others like swans and ducks.

Granted, i have been testing with Just Ruby Rose this whole time, and i did recently swap to Misty from Pokemon for my Pokemon testing and the results aren't QUITE as good as they were with ruby, and im not entirely sure what that could indicate. Then again, my sample size on that is literally only two characters.