this LORA on the <a target="_blank" rel="ugc" href="https://civarchive.com/models/795765/illustrious-xl">Illustrious-XLv0.1</a><a target="_blank" rel="ugc" href="https://civarchive.com/models/833294?modelVersionId=1022833"> </a>training standard, it is recommended to keep the weights between -2 and +2 (usually). As shown in the figure, the function of this LoRA is to deepen/lighten the contrast in the image. Different effects can be achieved by using positive or negative weights.For different versions, please read About this version .After testing, I discovered some weird features (?), for models trained on the <a target="_blank" rel="ugc" href="https://civarchive.com/models/795765/illustrious-xl">Illustrious-XLv0.1</a>, their stability and performance are much better. but for the <a target="_blank" rel="ugc" href="https://civarchive.com/models/795765/illustrious-xl">Illustrious-XLv0.1</a> model itself, its stability is slightly worse... I started having some doubts about my work, but I still uploaded it.<h3 id="warning:-1415p8iyf">Warning:</h3>In some complex scenes or scenes with monotonous tones, this model may produce elements that differ significantly from the original image.

Illustrious contrast adjuster

from Illustrious-XL-0.1 Strength:-2~2

Files with SHA256: ffd1cf2536d26864962935f8c2e17a21f632aa8f2a65bbe27ebc8fdabdf61286