<h3 id="the-preview-images-are-cherry-picked-to-show-the-model-from-its-best-side.intended-to-be-used-only-with-illustrious-models.">The preview images are cherry-picked to show the model from its best side. Intended to be used only with Illustrious models.</h3>An attempt to move <a target="_blank" rel="ugc" href="https://civarchive.com/models/455275/ktf-style-pd">KTF Style</a> to Illustrious. This LoRA's goal is soft style shift, being a blend of comic/cartoon with anime, focused mainly on hair and eyes, but also influencing other facial features and general body shape, especially the head:torso:legs ratio.Much like the PD version, it works best for solo closeups or portraits, and struggles with distant, panoramic or group pictures, with noticeable drops in quality the further the character is from the 'camera'. It's also strongly biased towards feminine appearance, rarely ignoring masculine prompts.Thanks to being an IL model, unlike the PD version, it has better color composition and good lighting quality. However, this style actively goes against some of the strong suits of IL, creating a slightly flatter and chunkier results, with less high frequency details like material texture, small patterns or smooth gradients.It doesn't use any activation keywords, and is meant to be used in 0.8~1.2 strength range. Gets wacky above 1.4, has some weirdness below 0.0, but can go down to -1.0 for interesting results.<a target="_blank" rel="ugc" href="https://civarchive.com/models/1265326?modelVersionId=2406087">MKTF</a> is more stable, flexible and is overall more reliable. <a target="_blank" rel="ugc" href="https://civarchive.com/models/1265326?modelVersionId=1426987">KTF</a> has some minor hiccups with prompt adherence, but offers a more pure style.

KTF Style IL

A test build.Not very consistent, but is relatively stable and doesn't brutalize the image as much as previous attempts at training this model.Main issue is prompt adherence, bleeding between tags and overall confusion.The goals for future versions are:<ul><li>higher consistency and reliability =&gt; less likely to not influence the result</li><li>more pronounced and even style =&gt; strength of 1.0 should look similar to itself and not be sometimes stronger or weaker</li><li>less tag shenaniganry =&gt; fixing some mixups with unrelated keywords bleeding into each other</li><li>(optional) closer style match to the PD version</li></ul>

Files with SHA256: 7ba2a4c7f4fc7d5167ef5b1fccd8fd11bea4c85f0b76aa5acb75c9eb122b6634